← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Flood Recovery Framework

17 April 2024

Lead MP

Philip Dunne
Ludlow
Con

Responding Minister

Robbie Moore

Tags

EconomyTaxationAgriculture & Rural AffairsLocal Government
Word Count: 13415
Other Contributors: 9

At a Glance

Philip Dunne raised concerns about flood recovery framework in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The lead MP asks the government to review eligibility criteria for flood recovery funds to make them fairer and to allocate additional funding to local authorities to handle immediate relief efforts. He also urges consideration of broader measures to support farmers affected by flooding, including reviewing the farming recovery fund criteria to ensure wider coverage. The Minister should provide more consistency in the application of the flood recovery framework, extend it to all businesses affected by flooding, and ensure that council tax payments and business rates are suspended during periods when properties cannot be used. Additionally, there needs to be a strategic plan for sewage management and an insurance scheme for businesses.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Ludlow
Opened the debate
Flooding remains a pressing issue for many constituents who have suffered from severe weather events. The UK is experiencing increased rainfall, with six of the ten wettest years on record since 1998. In Shropshire, multiple flood events have affected properties along the River Severn; in October 2022 and January 2023 alone, over 160 properties were flooded. The complexity of support measures for those affected highlights the need for a more streamlined approach to ensure that assistance reaches all who require it. Flooding in York has worsened significantly since the Boxing Day floods of 2015, with more frequent and prolonged flooding impacting businesses. The current flood recovery framework does not adequately address individual business needs and requires a broader geographical area to qualify for support. With 1,414 sewage releases last year in York alone, there is an urgent need for improved sewer infrastructure.

Government Response

Robbie Moore
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Efford. I thank my right hon. Friend the Member for Ludlow (Philip Dunne) for securing this important debate and all hon. Members who have contributed. The Government sympathise with constituents affected by flooding and are investing £5.2 billion between 19/20 and 26/27 to better protect communities from flooding and coastal erosion, which has led to the protection of over 600,000 properties since 2010. Since Storm Babet and Storm Henk, the Government have activated a flood recovery framework providing community recovery grants (£500 per flooded household), business recovery grants (up to £2,500 for eligible SMEs), council tax discount and business rate relief (minimum period of three months), property flood resilience repair grant (up to £5,000 per property). The minister assures Somerset residents are eligible for the property flood resilience repair grant due to 106 properties being flooded. All measures and schemes will be reviewed following requests by MPs, including a visit from the Minister to address flooding issues in Stapleford. Shropshire County Council is eligible to receive funding as per Storms Babet and Henk impacts. The threshold of 50 internally flooded properties was reduced for unitary authority areas post feedback, not increased as wrongly claimed by the shadow minister. The minister is considering extra funding for local authorities to deliver framework schemes. I look forward to further conversations with Members regarding this important matter.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.