← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

State Pension Changes: Women

12 March 2024

Lead MP

Jim Shannon
Strangford
DUP

Responding Minister

Paul Maynard

Tags

TaxationEmploymentForeign AffairsBenefits & WelfareWomen & Equalities
Word Count: 14200
Other Contributors: 27

At a Glance

Jim Shannon raised concerns about state pension changes: women in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The speaker urges the Government to acknowledge the harm caused by these changes, issue a public apology to the WASPI women, compensate them for their losses, deliver restitution promptly and efficiently, engage in dialogue with the women to address underlying causes of the issues, and adopt a holistic approach to pension system challenges.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Strangford
Opened the debate
The debate focuses on the adverse effects of state pension changes on women born in the 1950s, often referred to as WASPI women. The speaker emphasises that these women were not adequately informed about the increase in their state pension age from 60 to 65 or 66. They argue that this lack of information has caused financial hardship, emotional distress and health problems for many. The debate also highlights issues of discrimination on grounds of sex and age, inadequate communication strategies by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), and a failure to consult those affected.

Government Response

Paul Maynard
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under the chairmanship of Sir Gary Streeter. I thank Jim Shannon for securing this debate and all Members who have contributed, recognising the strength of feeling among 1950s-born women affected by state pension age changes and the difficulties they face. The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman's investigation into state pension age communication is ongoing, with no indication from the ombudsman on a publication date. While the Department for Work and Pensions cooperates fully with the investigation, it cannot make commitments regarding justice or compensation until the final report is published due to its confidentiality. The announcement in 1993 of equalising state pension age addressed inequality between men and women; changes were made through Acts by successive Governments following consultations and debates. Women retiring today can expect over two years longer receipt of the state pension than men if equalisation had not occurred. The Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman found maladministration in notifying affected women from 2005 to 2007, causing injustice. In 2016, the state pension was reformed with a new system to simplify and sustain pensions, improving outcomes for many women, carers, and self-employed individuals. Automatic enrolment has increased participation rates among eligible women in private sector work from 40% in 2012 to 86% in 2022. Pension credit provides extra money for daily living costs, with the case load being just under 1.4 million people, of whom 63% are single women. The poverty rate for pensioners has decreased by two percentage points since 2010. Additionally, cost-of-living payments are available to those most vulnerable.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.