← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Funding for Youth Services

28 February 2024

Lead MP

Rachel Hopkins
Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Lab

Responding Minister

Stuart Andrew

Tags

Crime & Law EnforcementJustice & CourtsCulture, Media & SportBenefits & WelfareMental HealthLocal Government
Word Count: 13063
Other Contributors: 8

At a Glance

Rachel Hopkins raised concerns about funding for youth services in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Hopkins asks the Minister to address the YMCA's recommendations for sustained and long-term revenue funding to bolster universal youth services, a cross-departmental strategy for youth services, and enforcement of a duty on local authorities to ensure that all young people can access youth services. She also inquires about discussions with other Government Departments regarding long-term resources and steps being taken to increase the number of full-time equivalent youth workers. The Government should provide a clear update on their measures to improve training for youth workers and the impact these have had, as well as ensuring that young people who commit violence are offered support or training to control their behaviour. Adequate funding is needed now to prevent further exploitation and criminalisation of young people.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Opened the debate
Rachel Hopkins is concerned about the severe underfunding and deprioritisation of youth services in England, which has led to significant cuts since 2010. She cites a £170 million budget cut for Luton Council alone and notes that spending per head on youth services has decreased by 75% nationally since 2010-11, sitting at only £48 per five to 17-year-old. Hopkins also mentions regional funding inequalities, with the west midlands having the lowest spend per young person (£24), and highlights a 35% reduction in full-time equivalent youth workers employed by local authorities. Cuts to youth services have led to a rise in crime and antisocial behaviour. Council funding for youth services has been slashed by an average of 73% over the last 12 years, with per child spending dropping to £47.79 on average across England. In some areas, such as Middlesborough, this figure decreased by 94%, while in the City of London it is £493.67. The number of council youth centres has fallen by 53% since 2011-12.

Government Response

Stuart Andrew
Government Response
I recognise the importance of youth services and acknowledge their positive impacts on young people's wellbeing, confidence, social skills, political awareness, and citizenship. More than 85% of a young person's waking hours are spent outside school, making youth workers and volunteers crucial in supporting young people. I highlighted our campaign targeting loneliness among young people and mentioned the Lift youth centre in Islington as an example of transformational youth services. The Department for Levelling Up has committed £2 billion to youth service spending, with Sport England, Arts Council England, and the National Lottery Community Fund contributing additional funding. Local authorities play a key role in delivering youth services and have received increased funding through the local government settlement to support crucial services and early intervention measures. The holiday activities and food programme is provided with £200 million annually to ensure disadvantaged young people have enriching holidays. We are investing over £500 million towards the national youth guarantee, ensuring every young person has access to regular out-of-school activities by 2025. We are also supporting local authorities through updated statutory guidance and a peer review programme to facilitate sharing of best practices. The Youth Investment Fund aims to create up to 300 youth facilities across England, with more than £250 million already allocated towards this goal. Additionally, we have reformed the National Citizen Service (NCS) programme into year-round offerings, benefiting over 120,000 young people last year and thousands more in ongoing programmes. Our investment includes support for uniformed youth organisations to recruit volunteers and expand their capacity, as well as outdoor learning opportunities through the adventures away from home fund. We have provided £3.7 million of the million hours fund to over 400 youth organisations to address antisocial behaviour risks and invested in the #iwill fund to create community engagement opportunities. We are dedicated to increasing access to green spaces for disadvantaged young people with a £2.5 million investment. The summer jobs programme will support 2,600 young people at risk of youth crime, and the Turnaround programme aims to improve outcomes for up to 17,500 more young people on the cusp of entering the youth justice system. We are working with the National Youth Agency to maintain and improve youth work qualifications and provide guidance on safeguarding. We also fund bursaries to help those who cannot afford youth work qualifications due to cost constraints. Overall, we aim for collaboration among central government, local government, and community organisations to ensure high-quality experiences accessible to young people regardless of their location or circumstances.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.