← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

International Human Rights Abuses: UK Response — [Dame Maria Miller in the Chair]

24 January 2024

Lead MP

Sarah Owen
Luton North
Lab

Responding Minister

David Rutley

Tags

ImmigrationUkraineWomen & Equalities
Word Count: 12802
Other Contributors: 12

At a Glance

Sarah Owen raised concerns about international human rights abuses: uk response — [dame maria miller in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Ms Owen urges the government to correct its approach in Gaza, particularly regarding aid routes being blocked and requests to open crossings being denied. She also asks for dialogue with Indian authorities about abuses in Jammu and Kashmir and for a commitment to promote a truth and reconciliation commission initiative to Ministers' Indian counterparts.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Luton North
Opened the debate
Ms Owen is concerned about the lack of consistency in the UK's response to human rights abuses, citing specific instances in Gaza and Jammu and Kashmir. She notes that over 24,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since 2023, with half of them being children. Additionally, she mentions arbitrary arrests, illegal airstrikes against churches and refugee camps, and the potential for genocide as reported by UN human rights experts. In Jammu and Kashmir, there is an ongoing crackdown on rights, including internet access control, arbitrary detentions, and police killings without accountability.

Government Response

David Rutley
Government Response
The Government believes in the importance of human rights and has made five human rights pledges to the United Nations, including supporting human rights defenders and equal rights for women, disabled people, and LGBT+ persons. The UK continues to hold human rights abusers accountable through sanctions against individuals linked to repressive activities in countries like Belarus, Haiti, Iran, and Syria. Minister highlights the persecution of Christians in Nigeria and Pakistan, Muslims, Buddhists, and Baha'is. He expresses support for freedom of religion or belief and acknowledges the work of human rights defenders like Quinto Inuma Alvarado in Peru. The UK has led resolutions at the UN Human Rights Council on Sudan, Somalia, girls' education, Russia, and Afghanistan. Minister discusses Ukraine's Office of the Prosecutor General's record of over 120,000 incidents of war crimes, murder, rape, and deportation of children. He mentions the imprisonment of Vladimir Kara-Murza in Russia for opposing the illegal war in Ukraine. The UK also expresses concern about Gaza and Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law, noting that Ministers review advice carefully before acting consistently with it. On export licences, all are kept under continuous review to ensure adherence to strategic export licensing criteria. Regarding South Africa's case at the International Court of Justice on Israel and Gaza, the Government does not support it as they believe Israel has a right to defend itself against Hamas. The UK recognises human rights concerns in Kashmir but leaves resolution up to India and Pakistan. Concerning Rwanda, the Home Secretary has clarified that legislation does not challenge the UK's relationship with the European Convention on Human Rights. Issues of China's human rights violations in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong are raised consistently by the UK at high levels. The Government calls for the repeal of the national security law in Hong Kong and Jimmy Lai's release. Iran's oppressive hijab laws and reprisals against women and human rights defenders have led to sanctions on 94 individuals and entities for human rights violations.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.