← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Groceries Supply Code of Practice
22 January 2024
Lead MP
Christina Rees
Neath
Lab
Responding Minister
Mark Spencer
Tags
Business & TradeAgriculture & Rural Affairs
Word Count: 18242
Other Contributors: 18
At a Glance
Christina Rees raised concerns about groceries supply code of practice in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
I invite the Minister to meet me and the petitioners so that we can explore these issues in greater depth. The Government should consider reforms such as expanding the number of retailers covered by the code, preventing retailers from circumventing the code through intermediaries, increasing the powers and remit of the GCA to cover pricing and processes, and setting up separate regulators with separate obligations.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The petitioners believe a stronger, clearer code of practice is needed to make sure that all supermarkets stick to fair practices when dealing with farmers. Farmers are concerned about the behaviour of supermarkets and fear they will have to give up their farm within the next year due to unfair trading practices. The current GSCP does not cover relationships between farmers and intermediaries or processors, leaving many farmers vulnerable to unfair trading practices and at a significant disadvantage in negotiations with powerful retailers.
Alicia Kearns
Con
Rutland and Stamford
Ms Kearns highlighted the challenges faced by farmers in Rutland, Melton, and the Harborough villages due to external shocks such as rising fertiliser prices and natural disasters. She urged for a more balanced power dynamic within supply chains and supported lowering the threshold for inclusion in the code to retailers with revenue of £500 million. Additionally, she called for the establishment of a gas fertiliser price index to ensure transparency in the market.
Anthony Mangnall
Con
Fylde
Apologises for being late, commends Christina Rees's campaign which has seen over 100,000 sign a petition. Highlights the five principles of fair trade with farmers and calls for cross-party collaboration to use legislation like the Procurement Act 2023 effectively. Welcomed the statutory footing of the Trade and Agriculture Commission under the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010, allowing debates on future trade deals to ensure Members have a voice in reviewing advice from the commission. Could he say a few words about the Procurement Act 7023? The measures will take effect in October 2024, so perhaps he will help the House to understand the value of that for small suppliers and small farmers across the country.
Ben Lake
PC
Ceredigion Preseli
The MP emphasized the need to strengthen and broaden the scope of the groceries supply code of practice, noting that farmers in his constituency face severe uncertainty due to inflationary pressures and unfair trading practices. He highlighted how large grocery industry businesses exercise power over suppliers without considering long-term consequences, impacting sectors like horticulture and poultry severely. The MP also mentioned the impact of consolidation in processing sectors, which leaves primary producers with less choice regarding whom they sell their produce to. With 25% of dairy farmers considering whether to continue farming due to strain from unfair practices, he called for extending the code to intermediaries and empowering the Groceries Code Adjudicator.
Daniel Zeichner
Lab
Cambridge
He thanked colleagues for their contributions and highlighted the struggles farmers face due to rising costs, avian flu, climate events, and unfair practices by supermarkets. He noted that many suppliers feel supermarket-retailer relations have regressed and cited a Groceries Code Adjudicator report detailing how some major retailers are asking for price decreases while threatening delisting. Zeichner also raised concerns about the limited resources of the Groceries Code Adjudicator and called for greater transparency in supply chains. Does the Minister agree that it has been a slow process? We still do not have the regulations. Could he give the House an indication of when we might expect to see them?
David Jones
Con
Clwyd West
The hon. Member for Neath introduced the debate on small suppliers' concerns about supermarket supply chain practices. Over 112,000 signatures have been collected in support of the petition initiated by Guy Singh-Watson of Riverford Organic Farmers. Small-scale farmers and growers face immense pressure from large supermarkets due to disparities in bargaining strength. According to Sustain, farmers receive less than a penny of the profit generated by their produce. The Groceries Supply Code of Practice does not adequately protect small family firms. David Jones mentioned that 49% of farmers fear going out of business within a year and 61% face adverse mental health effects from supply chain unfairness. Brief intervention noting his constituency involvement in the debate.
Fleur Anderson
Lab
Putney
Welcomes the debate for urban constituencies too, citing concerns from constituents about British fruit and veg growers going out of business due to unfair terms by supermarkets.
Greg Smith
Con
Mid Buckinghamshire
He argued that the groceries supply code of practice needs to be strengthened and extended, citing issues such as soaring input costs for farmers, a lack of price increases from processors and retailers, and the loss of over 8,000 agricultural businesses. He called for lowering the turnover threshold for regulated entities to £500 million to ensure more comprehensive coverage.
Helen Morgan
Lib Dem
North Shropshire
Morgan highlighted the challenges faced by dairy farmers in North Shropshire, noting that 23% of dairy farmers are unsure about continuing production into 2025 due to high input costs and low milk prices. She emphasized the importance of supporting these producers to maintain food security, environmental standards, and animal welfare. It is very important that the regulations take effect before farming businesses go out of business. The barriers to entry are high, there is a high cost of investment and we need to keep people in business.
Hayes and Harlington
The MP declared an interest as a Riverford customer and recalled that the adjudicator's code was tested in relation to below-cost selling and marketing practices in the baking sector, impacting farmers. He mentioned the need for interventions by the ombudsperson at that time and argued that such incidents highlight the inadequacies of the current code.
Carmarthen East and Dinefwr
Welcomes the debate, noting that farmers have faced substantial inflation in input costs such as fertiliser, highlighting their vulnerability within the supply chain.
Julian Lewis
Con
New Forest East
Asks whether there is a mechanism for small farmers to report breaches to the regulator when promises made are not kept, questioning how regulation can be effective without such information.
Keir Mather
Lab
Selby
Farms in Selby and Ainsty are crucial for national supply chains, yet farmers face limited market choice due to the dominance of 12 retailers who control 95% of Britain's food sales. Farmers also endure significant shocks from trade deals, pandemics, wars, and climate events without adequate compensation or support.
Kerry McCarthy
Lab
Bristol East
My concern is that smaller suppliers will be disadvantaged because they are less able to do things such as switch to electric vehicles or retrofit their buildings. There is a real danger that supermarkets will stop seeking supplies from them because of that.
Kirsty Blackman
SNP
Aberdeen North
Ms Blackman highlighted the importance of farming and food production, noting that around 67,000 people are directly employed in agriculture in Scotland. She called for clarity on future rural funding, EU labelling rules, and immigration policies affecting seasonal workers and abattoirs. Ms Blackman also mentioned issues with veterinary services and seed potatoes, suggesting the need for communication between UK and Scottish Governments to address these problems. If it takes four years for each sector, the process is going to take quite a length of time. I will probably be dead by the time all the sectors are covered. Does the Minister understand that there is some urgency? Taking less than four years would be great, and doing more than one sector at a time would also be helpful.
Richard Foord
Lib Dem
Honiton and Sidmouth
Mr Foord highlighted the pressure farmers are under due to uncertainty in support from the Government, trade deals with Australia and New Zealand, and unfair practices by supermarkets. He pointed out that 112,780 individuals signed a petition regarding this issue, placing his constituency seventh on the list of signatories. Mr Foord emphasized the importance of fair prices for farmers' produce to ensure thriving communities. He also cited an example where Aldi and other supermarkets sold vegetables at extremely low prices below production costs, impacting vegetable producers' ability to make ends meet. Furthermore, he mentioned that Tesco saw sales increases of 6.6%, which delivered £2.7 billion in profit, while farmers struggle.
Sarah Dyke
Lib Dem
Glastonbury and Somerton
Farmers are often disenfranchised in the agrifood supply chain, with producers receiving less than one penny in the pound of profit. Farmers fear going out of business within 12 months due to supermarket behaviour. Sarah Dyke called for tougher rules and more support for British farmers.
Selaine Saxby
Con
North Devon
Agrees with the hon. Lady and emphasises the role of farmers in the green transition, advocating for fair prices from supermarkets to ensure sustainable production.
Simon Jupp
Con
East Devon
He supported the petition for better protection of farmers and producers, urging supermarkets to buy what they agree to buy and pay on time. He highlighted the importance of fair practices and prices for local farmers in East Devon, noting that 840 constituents signed a related petition. Jupp also called for expanding the scope of the groceries supply code of practice beyond major retailers and suggested using powers under the Agriculture Act 2020 to address contractual issues.
Government Response
Mark Spencer
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under the chairmanship of Mrs Murray, and I congratulate the hon. Member for Neath on leading this debate. The number of signatures on the petition demonstrates how highly valued farmers are in the UK. The Government want all farmers to receive fair prices for their products and are committed to tackling contractual unfairnesses in the agrifood supply chain through statutory codes introduced under the Agriculture Act. These codes apply across the whole supply chain to deliver fair prices to all farmers, addressing issues such as unilateral variation of supply agreements, wastage, forecasting errors, and timely invoice payments. The Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA) enforces these regulations and conducts reviews every three years; the most recent review in July 2023 found that the GCA continued to be an effective regulator. The positive impact is evident from the latest annual survey results, with fewer direct suppliers experiencing issues now compared to when the GCA was first set up. However, unfair practices still exist and the Government intend to introduce sector-specific statutory codes of contractual practice, tailored to each sector's needs, focusing initially on dairy, pork, egg, and fresh produce sectors. The minister has committed to tabling these regulations before the Easter recess and is working closely with retailers and processors to ensure they are proportionate and flexible for a global commodity market. Additionally, the Government aim to protect farmers while ensuring primary producers benefit from environmental improvements and avoiding offshoring of carbon.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.