← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Woodland Creation — [Emma Lewell in the Chair]

11 February 2026

Lead MP

Chris Curtis
Milton Keynes North
Lab

Responding Minister

Mary Creagh

Tags

Climate
Word Count: 13230
Other Contributors: 15

At a Glance

Chris Curtis raised concerns about woodland creation — [emma lewell in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I ask the Government to support woodland creation projects like the wetland arc in Milton Keynes, which is part of a larger national initiative aimed at increasing woodland cover to 16.5% by 2050 as per the Environment Act 2021 target.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Milton Keynes North
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the loss of wetlands and biodiversity. According to the 2025 global wetland outlook, around 22% of the world's wetlands have been lost since the 1970s, placing immense pressure on biodiversity and increasing flood risk. In Milton Keynes, the wetland arc project aims to cover 355 hectares, enhancing wildlife habitat, providing vital flood mitigation, supporting active travel, and connecting local people with nature.

Government Response

Mary Creagh
Government Response
Emphasised the importance of woodlands in biodiversity, air filtration, and public health. Noted plans to manage invasive species like muntjac deer and Chinese water deer, as well as initiatives such as introducing lynx and expanding national forests. Announced £1 billion investment into tree planting and forestry sector for this Parliament, aiming to achieve the new 2030 interim tree cover target. Discussed funding for woodland creation through grants and apprenticeships.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.