← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Gatwick Airspace Modernisation Review
18 December 2024
Lead MP
John Milne
Horsham
Lib Dem
Responding Minister
Mike Kane
Tags
DefenceClimate
Word Count: 3926
Other Contributors: 5
At a Glance
John Milne raised concerns about gatwick airspace modernisation review in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
I urge the Minister to reconsider the process to ensure it accounts for public wellbeing and provides credible alternatives that are accepted as legitimate by the public. The review should be transparent, with high levels of scrutiny, and aligned with recent CAA reports on equitable distribution.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
I am concerned about the impact of the Gatwick airspace modernisation review on local communities, particularly in my constituency. The review involves a conflict of interest as the airport operator is also managing the process. Residents are worried about noise pollution and public health impacts from new flight paths. There is suspicion that the three shortlisted options represent one choice that benefits the airport operator at the expense of residents' interests. Transparency issues include no independent member in the design process, a lack of defined methodology for shortlisting flightpath options, and disregard for previous complaints about similar routes.
Alison Bennett
Lib Dem
Mid Sussex
Expresses concern about potential expansion at Gatwick, especially the emergency runway coming into commercial use, suggesting that problems will only worsen if approved.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Commends the hon. Gentleman for securing this debate, highlighting that sound is an extreme importance in airport modernisation reviews and asking if noise should be a top priority to ensure local communities are not negatively impacted.
Mike Martin
Lib Dem
Tunbridge Wells
In Tunbridge Wells, there is only one noise monitor in Rusthall. The MP questions how the proposal will not shift or worsen aircraft noise problems without more monitors in affected areas.
Peter Lamb
Lab
Crawley
Raises concerns about infrastructure overload in north Sussex due to existing levels of demand from Gatwick and highlights the need for significant investment if capacity is increased.
Thomas Tugendhat
Con
Tonbridge
Describes the failure of the Noise Management Board and criticises the lack of protections for communities impacted by airspace expansion, advocating for a proper review of airspace across southern England. The MP appreciates the Minister's approach but highlights that increasing flight frequency from every 20 minutes to every 100 seconds will put significant pressure on communities like Cowden in west Kent. The MP argues for compensation similar to building a motorway next to someone's house.
Government Response
Mike Kane
Government Response
It is always a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Edward. I congratulate the hon. Member for Horsham on securing this timely and important debate. The UK's airspace is some of the most complex in the world, yet there has been little change since the 1950s. Modernising our airspace can deliver quicker, quieter, and cleaner journeys. New technologies will create direct routes and faster climbs, reducing the need for holding stacks, benefiting customers at Gatwick with more reliable services and opportunities to reduce noise and carbon emissions. The first step in modernising Gatwick's airspace involves following the Civil Aviation Authority's CAP 1616 process, revised earlier this year to be fairer and more transparent. This includes comprehensive engagement with local communities and stakeholders. Gatwick has passed stage 2 of the CAA's CAP 1616 process and will continue to fully consult at stage 3. The Minister understands the sensitive issue of noise and emphasises balancing the impact on communities with economic benefits, highlighting that modernisation can be more flexible. Gatwick is obliged under environmental noise regulations to produce noise action plans for managing aircraft noise between 2024 and 2028. Noise restrictions at Gatwick, Heathrow, and Stansted will remain until 2028. New technology such as performance-based navigation enhances the accuracy of where aircraft fly, providing better opportunities for respite in noise-sensitive areas. The main objective is environmental sustainability, supporting the aviation industry to decarbonise through measures like the jet zero taskforce. Airspace modernisation can help reach net-zero carbon emissions by reducing delays and allowing more direct routes, thus lowering fuel burn and noise impact. To improve confidence in airspace modernisation, a consultation on proposals for a new UK airspace design service has been launched to create a single guiding mind responsible for holistic airspace change. The Minister encourages full public consultation at stage 3 and engagement with the issue of modernising our airspace.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.