← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Rural Cycling Infrastructure
10 December 2024
Lead MP
Freddie Van Mierlo
Henley and Thame
Lib Dem
Responding Minister
Simon Lightwood
Tags
No tags
Word Count: 8340
Other Contributors: 11
At a Glance
Freddie Van Mierlo raised concerns about rural cycling infrastructure in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
I am calling on the Government to commit to investing in safe, off-road cycling routes and segregated cycle lanes in rural areas. The funding should be increased further for the 2025-26 period during the Department's current planning discussion to deliver concrete benefits for the economy, environment, health and wellbeing.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The mortality rates on rural roads are 2.7 times higher per mile cycled than on urban roads. The slashing of the active travel fund from £200 million to £50 million is considered shameful, leaving rural areas at risk of being left behind in policy development. There is a lack of central government funding for projects that remain just lines on a map. Compulsory purchase powers are often wielded for road projects but not used for cycle infrastructure, which stifles the progress of many ideas beyond the idea phase.
Andrew Cooper
Lab
Mid Cheshire
The constituency of Mid Cheshire features rivers and canals forming a 26-mile ring, ideal for cycling infrastructure. The MP suggests that canal towpaths offer safer and cheaper alternatives to traditional cycleways and calls for the potential nationwide development of such networks.
Ben Maguire
Lib Dem
North Cornwall
Mr. Ben Maguire emphasized the need for better cycling infrastructure in rural areas, using his North Cornwall constituency as an example. He pointed out that 99% of users on the popular Camel trail do not use it to commute despite its potential with e-bikes and suggested expanding this trail inland towards Camelford or introducing quiet lanes across the wider rural area. The aim is to support active travel, reduce carbon emissions, and align with government commitments for improving access to nature.
Ben Obese-Jecty
Con
Huntingdon
Cycling infrastructure in rural Huntingdon is poor, with many roads being too dangerous for cycling. The A1123 and Somersham Road have significant safety issues, including the Wheatsheaf crossroads where there are frequent accidents. The town's cycle path around the ring road is unsuitable due to its narrowness and shared use with pedestrians.
Cameron Thomas
Lib Dem
Tewkesbury
Cycling is essential in Tewkesbury, a rural area with limited public transport options. However, cyclists face significant risks due to poor infrastructure funding and design issues like flooding and narrow roads. The Gloucestershire cycle spine project has faced criticism for its implementation, threatening the connectivity of 14,000 residents.
Clive Jones
Lib Dem
Wokingham
Clive Jones discussed the importance of investing in cycle routes away from busy country roads to increase safety and encourage cycling. He noted that shifting traffic from cars to bikes could help solve congestion, parking issues, and improve air quality. Jones also pointed out a University of Oxford study showing significant environmental benefits from active travel.
Edward Morello
Lib Dem
West Dorset
Mr. Edward Morello highlighted the unique challenges faced by cyclists in rural areas, such as narrow and poorly maintained roads that are shared with fast-moving vehicles and horse riders. He cited statistics indicating that cyclists are almost twice as likely to be killed on a rural road compared to an urban one. In West Dorset, only 1.7% of people cycle to work, which is below the national average of 2.1%. Mr. Morello advocated for cycling infrastructure improvements and suggested extending existing routes like the old railway between Bridport and West Bay to promote safer cycling.
James MacCleary
Lib Dem
Lewes
James MacCleary highlighted the potential of cycling to transform rural areas and improve public health, reduce carbon emissions, and ease financial burdens. He mentioned that cycling contributes an estimated £5.4 billion annually to the economy and every pound invested generates over £5 in benefits. However, piecemeal progress cannot overcome systemic barriers, such as unsafe roads and insufficient infrastructure.
Jerome Mayhew
Con
Broadland and Fakenham
Emphasised the benefits of cycling, including health improvements and environmental benefits. Mentioned the need for continued investment in cycle routes and road maintenance. Highlighted concerns over potential funding cuts due to budget constraints.
Layla Moran
Lib Dem
Oxford West and Abingdon
In Oxford West and Abingdon, villages such as Botley and Eynsham are growing in population but often miss out on funding for cycling infrastructure despite efforts to connect them through the expansion of the A40. The MP argues that current funding pots are at odds with Government's modal shift goals. Asked about the rationale behind supporting cycling infrastructure, highlighting the health benefits for an ageing population and the role of cycling in reducing air pollution. Inquired about the Department's plans to support living well for longer.
Simon Opher
Lab
Stroud
Asked about funding for feasibility studies of new cycling routes in rural areas, highlighting a specific case in Dursley where no funds are available even for a study to establish a greenway linking the village to the train station.
Steffan Aquarone
Lib Dem
North Norfolk
Aquarone highlighted the need for ambitious and sustainable cycling infrastructure in rural areas like North Norfolk. He criticised previous Conservative funding cuts of £200 million from active transport budgets, leading to a decline in cycle routes. The Liberal Democrats aim to integrate cycling with public transport networks and convert underused roads into priority walking and cycling routes.
Government Response
Simon Lightwood
Government Response
Confirmed the Government's commitment to active travel by announcing an additional £100 million of capital funding for active travel infrastructure in the financial year 2025-26, reversing a previous reduction. Highlighted recent schemes such as the nearly £1.5 million scheme in Abingdon and nearly £2 million in Witney, aiming to create safe routes between towns. Noted that over 60% of respondents to the national travel attitudes survey cited safer roads as encouragement for cycling more. Emphasized the importance of high-quality active travel infrastructure that complies with relevant design standards. Mentioned collaborations with National Parks England and stakeholders such as Disabled Ramblers, Cycling UK, and the British Horse Society.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.