← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Fly-tipping
26 November 2024
Lead MP
Tristan Osborne
Chatham and Aylesford
Lab
Responding Minister
Mary Creagh
Tags
No tags
Word Count: 4620
Other Contributors: 8
At a Glance
Tristan Osborne raised concerns about fly-tipping in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The Government should standardise data collection for fly-tipping incidents and monitor fixed penalty notices and court enforcements in each council area. Additionally, the Minister should consider including persistent environmental crimes in respect orders and review fines based on the size and nature of fly-tips to deter commercial dumping.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Fly-tipping is a major environmental issue, costing millions annually and posing health and safety risks. Economic factors such as high waste management costs and reduced waste disposal services contribute to the problem. There has been a significant increase in fly-tipping since 2010, with BBC statistics showing a rise of around 40%. Enforcement numbers have declined due to budget cuts, leading to inconsistencies across councils.
Afzal Khan
Lab
Manchester Rusholme
Stressed the need for environmental education to reduce fly-tipping caused by lack of awareness and improper waste disposal practices.
Alex Ballinger
Lab
Halesowen
Highlighted instances of fly-tipping in Foxcote Lane, supporting respect orders to make those involved clean up waste.
Deirdre Costigan
Lab
Ealing Southall
Proposed mandatory take-back schemes and recyclable products to reduce waste, welcoming the Government's steps towards extended producer responsibility.
Jim Dickson
Lab
Dartford
Called on Dartford borough council to impose maximum fines as other councils do, highlighting increased incidents in his constituency.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Asked about the impact of tightening restrictions on general waste and their contribution to increased fly-tipping, urging government support for local councils. Suggested community payback initiatives as a solution, where individuals who commit fly-tipping are sanctioned to clear up the mess in green spaces or the location of their crime.
Kevin McKenna
Lab
Sittingbourne and Sheppey
Emphasised the complexity and lengthy nature of investigating fly-tipping cases on private land, urging for quicker enforcement actions. Supported the Love Medway Hate Litter campaign, emphasizing the importance of cross-boundary collaboration among local authorities to tackle fly-tipping.
Leigh Ingham
Lab
Stafford
Discussed a high-profile case of fly-tipping affecting schools and public health, questioning the effectiveness of current statistics in reflecting private land issues.
Rachel Taylor
Lab
North Warwickshire and Bedworth
Noted the rising frequency of fly-tipping with static prosecution numbers, calling for more government support for local councils to increase prosecutions. Highlighted the reduction in court fines issued due to local government budget cuts, noting that fines fell to £785,000 in 2022-23.
Government Response
Mary Creagh
Government Response
Mary Creagh noted over a million fly-tipping incidents reported in 2022-23, representing an increase of 10% on the previous three years. She called for an end to the throwaway society and advocated for increased recycling rates through measures such as deposit return schemes and extended producer responsibility regulations. Creagh also mentioned plans to equip prisoners for release and rehabilitation through environmental work and encouraged councils to use their enforcement powers effectively, including prosecution. She highlighted the government's commitment to resetting the relationship between local and central government by providing multi-year funding settlements and reforming the local audit system.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.