← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Electricity Grid Upgrades

26 November 2024

Lead MP

Bernard Jenkin
Harwich and North Essex
Con

Responding Minister

Michael Shanks

Tags

EconomyTaxation
Word Count: 13528
Other Contributors: 15

At a Glance

Bernard Jenkin raised concerns about electricity grid upgrades in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

I ask the Government to revise its planning policy to favour undergrounding high voltage direct current (HVDC) cables as a more cost-effective and community-friendly alternative to overhead pylons. This approach would respect local communities, reduce environmental impact, and ensure timely delivery of clean energy infrastructure.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Harwich and North Essex
Opened the debate
I am concerned about the delays caused by public opposition to overhead pylons for the National Energy System Operator's 'Clean Power 2030' project, particularly for the Norwich to Tilbury route. The cost of delay is estimated at £4 billion a year, and legal challenges could prolong these delays further. Public resistance stems from concerns about property, livelihoods, and environmental impact. Fintan Slye, executive director of NESO, emphasised the importance of public support in achieving decarbonisation goals.

Government Response

Michael Shanks
Government Response
Welcomed contributions to the debate and acknowledged the importance of grid upgrades, emphasizing their critical role for national infrastructure, energy security, economic growth, skilled jobs, and cheaper energy. Emphasized that communities hosting infrastructure should benefit from it and committed to developing guidance on effective community benefits. Highlighted the use of modern technology and innovative design options in upgrading existing power lines while balancing ecological impacts and cost. Noted NESO's advice on East Anglia project costs and clarified delays in undergrounding projects were not factored into some points made by MPs.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.