← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Windsor Framework
19 November 2024
Lead MP
Jim Allister
North Antrim
TUV
Responding Minister
Hilary Benn
Tags
Northern IrelandBrexit
Word Count: 3959
Other Contributors: 6
At a Glance
Jim Allister raised concerns about windsor framework in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The framework must be addressed and fixed by the Government to restore democratic rights for constituents who elect representatives to make their own laws.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
The Windsor framework was portrayed as a tremendous opportunity for Northern Ireland but has failed to produce the promised results. The framework's impact on foreign direct investment and access to GB supply markets is detrimental, leading to concerns in sectors such as farming with potential cut-offs of veterinary medicine supplies. Additionally, there are 300 areas where Northern Ireland is subject to EU laws rather than local governance, diminishing democratic accountability.
Alex Easton
Ind
North Down
Mr. Easton thanked Mr. Wilson for initiating the debate and expressed ethical concerns about the treatment of businesses and people in Northern Ireland under the Windsor Framework, citing Gladstone's principles as inspiration. Mr. Easton highlighted ongoing problems with pet passports, trade barriers, medication availability, and a symbolic border down the Irish Sea, emphasizing the impact on Unionists' feelings towards remaining part of the UK.
Carla Lockhart
DUP
Upper Bann
Ms. Lockhart shared Mr. Wilson's views on the negative impact of the Windsor Framework and protocol on businesses and consumers in Northern Ireland, questioning their alignment with the Belfast agreement.
Gavin Robinson
DUP
Belfast East
Mr. Robinson thanked the Secretary of State for acknowledging progress but urged him to honour agreements made in 'Safeguarding the Union' and stressed the imperative to respond appropriately and earnestly implement solutions.
Gregory Campbell
DUP
East Londonderry
Mr. Campbell outlined three approaches to dealing with problems: ignoring them, complaining without action, or working towards resolution. He emphasized the need for actual progress on resolving issues related to Northern Ireland's constitutional position.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Mr. Shannon praised Mr. Wilson for securing the debate and raised concerns about farmers being unable to access state aid, urging the Government to remove the protocol and return Northern Ireland fully to the UK.
Sammy Wilson
DUP
East Antrim
Mr. Wilson questioned the effectiveness of the Windsor Framework, highlighting that businesses face significant tax burdens and are restricted from accessing both UK and European markets. Mr. Wilson pointed out that despite Parliament's imposition, the UK internal market is not operating effectively due to issues such as supply chain constraints impacting businesses.
Government Response
Hilary Benn
Government Response
Acknowledged the importance of Northern Ireland to the UK Union, reiterated government commitment to implementing the Windsor framework in good faith and protecting Northern Ireland's place within the UK. Highlighted steps taken under 'Safeguarding the Union' to smooth goods flow, ensuring compatibility with international law while addressing unique circumstances. Stressed the complexity of balancing internal market integrity, avoiding a hard border on the island of Ireland, and respecting EU interests.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.