← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Transport Infrastructure Projects: Elizabeth Line
12 November 2024
Lead MP
Matt Rodda
Reading Central
Lab
Responding Minister
Simon Lightwood
Tags
EconomyTransport
Word Count: 11303
Other Contributors: 11
At a Glance
Matt Rodda raised concerns about transport infrastructure projects: elizabeth line in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
I ask the Minister to provide details of future rail investments in other parts of England and discuss further enhancements to the Elizabeth line. I also inquire about the possibility of more north-south improvements in electrification between the south coast and Oxford, introducing semi-fast services on the line, and developing a western rail link to Heathrow Airport.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
I am concerned about the importance of rail investment and long-term planning. I have received donations from two rail unions, ASLEF and the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers, and I am a season ticket holder who was involved in the Paddington rail crash. The Elizabeth line has generated £42 billion in economic benefits over two years and seen 700,000 daily journeys. It offers significant environmental advantages by providing an effective alternative to road transport. Additionally, it supports local businesses relocating near stations due to improved connectivity.
Al Pinkerton
Lib Dem
Surrey Heath
Mr Al Pinkerton discussed fragmented internal transport links in Surrey Heath, highlighting poor bus services affecting vulnerable residents and high car dependency due to lack of viable alternatives. He cited statistics showing over 56% of households owning two or more cars for trips under 10 km, and a daily passenger count of just 789 at Camberley station despite being only 28 miles from central London.
Ann Davies
PC
Caerfyrddin
I criticised the unfair Barnett formula that disadvantages Wales, resulting in a comparability factor for transport funding of 33.5% compared to Scotland and Northern Ireland at 95.6%. The autumn Budget further reduced Welsh investment opportunities, with no commitment towards HS2 or new rail projects. I called on the government to renegotiate the fiscal framework to improve Wales's transport comparability factor.
Derby North
I highlighted the importance of rail infrastructure in driving economic growth and creating jobs, particularly mentioning Alstom's train manufacturing in Derby. I supported plans for the electrification of the midland main line to reduce carbon emissions and improve travel efficiency. The Institution of Civil Engineers' stance on viewing rail infrastructure as strategic long-term investments was echoed.
Clive Jones
Lib Dem
Wokingham
Clive Jones highlights that Wokingham's railway services are unreliable, with only 66.8% of South Western Railway trains arriving on time and 4.8% being cancelled. He questions the Government's plan for nationalising railways and seeks clarity on how they intend to improve service reliability on the Great Western main line. Jones also supports the proposal to build a western rail link to Heathrow airport.
Daniel Francis
Lab
Bexleyheath and Crayford
The MP highlighted the benefits of the Elizabeth line for his constituency, noting its positive impact on journey times to central London. He expressed concern over the reduction in direct services from Crayford to Abbey Wood and advocated for extending the line to Ebbsfleet to improve transport connections for new housing developments and economic growth. The MP emphasised the need for further resource to refine scheme options and secure powers for delivery.
Deirdre Costigan
Lab
Ealing Southall
The Elizabeth line has transformed Ealing Southall, but stations like West Ealing and Hanwell face less frequent service despite increasing development. The speaker notes more delays and cancellations than expected for new rail infrastructure.
Jerome Mayhew
Con
Broadland and Fakenham
He highlighted the success of the Elizabeth line, noting that over £100 billion was invested in railways during Conservative Government periods. He also expressed concerns about delays and doubts regarding future projects such as the lower Thames crossing and Network North funding, questioning whether road infrastructure would be deprioritised under the new administration.
Jim Dickson
Lab
Dartford
The constituency of Dartford is experiencing significant population growth, with the local authority's population increasing by 20% between 2011 and 2021. Ebbsfleet alone has seen an increase of over 5,000 homes and plans for another 10,000 are in place. However, the Elizabeth line does not extend as far south as originally planned, missing out on connecting with Ebbsfleet. Jim Dickson urges the Government to consider extending the line to Ebbsfleet to support economic growth and improve transport connectivity.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Jim Shannon discussed the importance of the Elizabeth line for connectivity and its impact on commuters. He highlighted improvements made to the service since its upgrade, stressing the need for dependable transportation options both within London and connecting with airports like Heathrow. Shannon raised concerns about flight cancellations affecting travel plans and stressed that a reliable system is crucial for tourists and those relying on public transport for essential appointments.
Paul Kohler
Lib Dem
Wimbledon
Paul Kohler highlighted the Elizabeth line's success as an engineering marvel and economic growth driver in London, noting a 60% employment growth within 1 km of stations since opening. However, he also pointed out the project's overspending from £14.8 billion to £18.8 billion and delays, urging the Government to learn lessons for future projects.
Sarah Edwards
Lab
Tamworth
Ms Sarah Edwards welcomed improvements in Avanti West Coast services and the introduction of an all-electric train fleet, but expressed concerns about travel between Tamworth and Birmingham. She highlighted HS2's infrastructure benefits alongside its traffic issues and mentioned the economic potential of both HS2 and the Elizabeth line.
Government Response
Simon Lightwood
Government Response
It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Vickers. I thank all Members for their contributions to the debate, and I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Reading Central (Matt Rodda) for securing it. The Government recently delivered to the House their first Budget, which set out significant investment in transport including £485 million for Transport for London's capital renewals programme, over £650 million for local transport improvements, a £500 million increase in 2025-26 for local road maintenance, an additional £100 million in cycling and walking infrastructure, and over £200 million to accelerate the roll-out of electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Since the Elizabeth line opened in 2022, it has enabled more than 400 million passenger journeys, improving connectivity and reducing crowding on other routes. The Government supports TfL's order for 10 additional trains to further improve service capability and enhance supply chain capabilities across the country. Network Rail plans to renew outdated equipment on the Great Western main line over the next five years to improve reliability. My Department is working closely with TfL and other stakeholders to integrate existing Elizabeth line services into the new station at Old Oak Common, which will provide significantly enhanced connectivity with HS2 services. £30 million has been allocated to enable services to continue operating during construction of Old Oak Common station. We are committed to improving public transport as part of our mission-led Government.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.