← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Estate Adoption: North-east England — [Carolyn Harris in the Chair]
15 October 2024
Lead MP
Emma Foody
Cramlington and Killingworth
Lab Co-op
Responding Minister
Matthew Pennycook
Tags
EconomyTaxationHousing
Word Count: 3808
Other Contributors: 5
At a Glance
Emma Foody raised concerns about estate adoption: north-east england — [carolyn harris in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
The Government should ensure that estate adoption includes common adoptable standards, mandatory adoption of amenities where standards are met, and certainty for residents about timescales. This would give clarity to residents and enable local authorities to hold developers accountable for timely infrastructure delivery.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Residents in my constituency face unacceptable delays in the delivery of basic infrastructure such as road surfaces, pavements, street lighting, pedestrian crossings, and road markings. David lives on an estate where residents are cut off from facilities due to unfinished footpaths; Iain has faced excuses for three years regarding road surface improvements; and Mark has lived five years without street lighting despite paying full council tax and management fees. Local authorities lack power to compel developers to meet adoptable standards, leaving them to deal with resident complaints long after the developer's departure.
Chris McDonald
Lab
Stockton North
There are unfinished estates with high maintenance charges and lack of facilities, such as Willow Sage Court, Wynyard, and Queensgate; there should be a national framework of standards for private developers and sanctions for non-delivery.
David Smith
Lab
North Northumberland
In Amble, a private developer left an estate in a scruffy state and tried to escape blame through contractual error; there is also a 65% decrease in planning spending in the north of England.
Grahame Morris
Lab Co-op
Easington
Morris agrees that the current system is skewed towards developers, with little power given to residents and local authorities. He supports the need for clearer standards and mandatory adoption of amenities.
Joe Morris
Lab
Hexham
Residents in rural communities contact me about unsafe compounds and concerns over road conditions, damaging ongoing faith in the community and spirit; asks the Minister to elaborate on the importance of estate adoption.
Melanie Onn
Lab
Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes
Local authorities should be given additional powers and caps on costs to force developers to complete estates so that people can live in their dream home.
Government Response
Matthew Pennycook
Government Response
It is a real pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Mrs Harris. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Cramlington and Killingworth on securing this important debate. She has only been in the House for a short time but has already earned a well-deserved reputation as a hard-working and conscientious Member, and a doughty champion of her constituents' interests. The distinct set of problems faced by residential freeholders on private or mixed-tenure estates is well known and well understood, including excessive or inappropriate charges levied for minimal or even non-existent services, lack of transparency in estate management charges and fees, and the quality and timely delivery of infrastructure and amenities. At the root of many of these problems are the falling levels of adoption of amenities on housing estates by local authorities, as detailed in the CMA's house building market study published in February 2024. The Government is clear that the current situation is unfair and unreasonable and must be brought to an end. They intend to consult with homeowners, developers, local authorities, management companies, and others to develop meaningful and effective solutions to these problems. The consultation will need to consider a wide range of trade-offs, including costs to homeowners and local authorities, potential impacts on housing supply, and the links to the planning system. In direct response to the CMA's recommendations, we are committed to ending the injustice of fleecehold and better protecting residential freeholders from unfair costs.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.