← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Estate Adoption: North-east England — [Carolyn Harris in the Chair]

15 October 2024

Lead MP

Emma Foody
Cramlington and Killingworth
Lab Co-op

Responding Minister

Matthew Pennycook

Tags

EconomyTaxationHousing
Word Count: 3808
Other Contributors: 5

At a Glance

Emma Foody raised concerns about estate adoption: north-east england — [carolyn harris in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should ensure that estate adoption includes common adoptable standards, mandatory adoption of amenities where standards are met, and certainty for residents about timescales. This would give clarity to residents and enable local authorities to hold developers accountable for timely infrastructure delivery.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Emma Foody Lab Co-op
Cramlington and Killingworth
Opened the debate
Residents in my constituency face unacceptable delays in the delivery of basic infrastructure such as road surfaces, pavements, street lighting, pedestrian crossings, and road markings. David lives on an estate where residents are cut off from facilities due to unfinished footpaths; Iain has faced excuses for three years regarding road surface improvements; and Mark has lived five years without street lighting despite paying full council tax and management fees. Local authorities lack power to compel developers to meet adoptable standards, leaving them to deal with resident complaints long after the developer's departure.

Government Response

Matthew Pennycook
Government Response
It is a real pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Mrs Harris. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Cramlington and Killingworth on securing this important debate. She has only been in the House for a short time but has already earned a well-deserved reputation as a hard-working and conscientious Member, and a doughty champion of her constituents' interests. The distinct set of problems faced by residential freeholders on private or mixed-tenure estates is well known and well understood, including excessive or inappropriate charges levied for minimal or even non-existent services, lack of transparency in estate management charges and fees, and the quality and timely delivery of infrastructure and amenities. At the root of many of these problems are the falling levels of adoption of amenities on housing estates by local authorities, as detailed in the CMA's house building market study published in February 2024. The Government is clear that the current situation is unfair and unreasonable and must be brought to an end. They intend to consult with homeowners, developers, local authorities, management companies, and others to develop meaningful and effective solutions to these problems. The consultation will need to consider a wide range of trade-offs, including costs to homeowners and local authorities, potential impacts on housing supply, and the links to the planning system. In direct response to the CMA's recommendations, we are committed to ending the injustice of fleecehold and better protecting residential freeholders from unfair costs.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.