← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Independent Schools: VAT and Business Rates Exemptions

08 October 2024

Lead MP

Bradley Thomas
Bromsgrove
Con

Responding Minister

James Murray

Tags

EducationEconomyTaxation
Word Count: 14523
Other Contributors: 34

At a Glance

Bradley Thomas raised concerns about independent schools: vat and business rates exemptions in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Thomas requests that the Government abandon or delay implementation of the policy until September, perform a full consultation and impact assessment, protect very small schools from VAT changes, exempt service families on continuity of education allowance from VAT, and provide support for students transitioning between independent and state sectors without disruption to their education. The Minister should confirm whether low-income families and staff members in receipt of bursaries or discounts would be liable for VAT on school fees. He should also consider exemptions for arts schools, mitigate financial planning issues for international pupils, ensure legal exemptions for SEND provision, address impacts on council budgets, and provide funding for transport and private placements.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Bromsgrove
Opened the debate
Mr. Bradley Thomas is concerned about Labour's plan to remove VAT and business rate exemptions for independent schools, stating that the policy will not achieve its aims and could displace children mid-education. He cites statistics such as 71% of parents feeling influenced by rising school fees and 26% considering withdrawal from independent schooling due to potential VAT introduction. Thomas also highlights economic benefits like supporting 328,000 jobs and saving £4.5 billion for the state through choice-based education funding. The policy will remove the ability of people to send their children to local primary schools as places get filled by those who currently can just about afford private schools. The continuity of education allowance for military families may no longer house all 4,200 users, and arts schools being exempt could withdraw opportunities from the arts sector. The financial planning of international pupils will be impacted, and there is an issue with council budgets if children are taken out of the private sector.

Government Response

James Murray
Government Response
It is a pleasure to speak in this debate with Dame Caroline Dinenage in the Chair. I start by congratulating Bradley Thomas on securing this debate and thanking all Members for their contributions. The Government cares deeply about education, aiming to break down barriers to opportunity and ensuring every child has access to high-quality education through improving state schools. To fund these improvements, we will end tax breaks for private schools from January 2025 by introducing VAT at the standard rate of 20% on all education services provided by private schools in the UK. This policy will raise revenue but may lead to increased costs for some parents and carers whose children are in the private system. While private schools will charge VAT, most are expected to absorb a significant proportion to keep fee increases affordable for most parents. HMRC is ready to support schools with registration ahead of January 2025 and will publish bespoke guidance on gov.uk by October 30th. The policy's impact has been carefully considered, including the number of pupils who may switch to state education, which is expected to be minimal over several years. We are committed to transforming the system for supporting children and young people with special educational needs in all schools. This decision was necessary to help raise funding needed to deliver our priorities for state education in the country.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.