← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Financial Fraud and Economic Crime

11 September 2024

Lead MP

Luke Charters
York Outer
Lab

Responding Minister

Not recorded

Tags

Policing & ResourcesEconomyTaxation
Word Count: 8358
Other Contributors: 7

At a Glance

Luke Charters raised concerns about financial fraud and economic crime in Westminster Hall. Response awaited from government.

Key Requests to Government:

The hon. Member asks the Government to set an ambitious anti-fraud target that surpasses current levels and includes businesses in its scope. He recommends creating a new national anti-fraud centre, supporting data sharing between sectors, enabling banks to share payment data, imposing shared responsibility on social media companies for fraud origination, and expanding FCA powers over the Post Office's everyday banking service.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

York Outer
Opened the debate
The hon. Member is concerned about the increasing sophistication of financial fraud techniques, including AI avatars, shell companies, spearfishing, parasitic targeting of legitimate firms, and advanced cloning methods. He notes that these crimes have a significant emotional impact on victims, particularly those with low incomes or lower tech proficiency. The current situation in the UK is alarming, as fraud accounts for over 40% of crime but receives only 1% of police resources. Additionally, the cost of payments fraud to the economy is £1.2 billion annually, and individual losses can reach five-figure sums. Local police forces often deprioritise fraud reports due to geographical complexities.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.