← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

SEND Provision — [Clive Betts in the Chair]

05 September 2024

Lead MP

Richard Burgon
Leeds East
Lab

Responding Minister

Catherine McKinnell

Tags

NHSEducationEmployment
Word Count: 14178
Other Contributors: 35

At a Glance

Richard Burgon raised concerns about send provision — [clive betts in the chair] in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should address the root causes of the crisis by increasing funding, improving SEND training for teachers and special educational needs co-ordinators, adding more support staff in schools with proper pay, changing the curriculum to reduce focus on tests and league tables, implementing genuine early intervention strategies, restoring Sure Start services, scrapping the safety valve scheme, writing off local authority debts, and providing additional funding. The debate should also address the blame game unfairly placed on parents.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Leeds East
Opened the debate
The crisis in special educational needs and disability (SEND) provision is a result of austerity measures that have reduced council budgets, caused long-term harm to the NHS, placed pressure on schools, and weakened services. The number of pupils with SEND has increased to 1.7 million since 2014, and over half of SEND pupils have been forced out of school due to inadequate provision. Two in three special schools are at or over capacity, and there are eye-watering delays for children to receive assessments and plans. Nearly a third of parents resorted to the legal system to get support for their children, spending thousands of pounds.

Government Response

Catherine McKinnell
Government Response
It is an honour to serve under you as Chair, Mr Betts. I congratulate the hon. Member for Leeds East on securing a debate on this incredibly important subject. The strength of feeling on this issue is clear, and I reassure the Chamber that this Government are absolutely committed to tackling it. More than 1.6 million children and young people in England have special educational needs, and we know that too many families have been let down by a system that is not working. Despite high needs funding rising to higher levels, confidence in the system is low, tribunal rates are increasing, and there are long waits for support. Only one in four pupils achieve expected standards at the end of primary school. The Labour Government wants to improve inclusivity in mainstream schools and ensure special schools can cater to those with complex needs. Early identification and intervention are key, so we have continued funding for the Nuffield Early Language Intervention programme. We know that there are no quick fixes, but we are determined to fix it. We acted quickly by announcing a new core schools budget grant providing over £140 million of extra funding in this financial year to help with teacher pay award and increased pay for support staff. However, despite these record levels of investment, families continue to struggle as the system is not delivering. The high needs allocations have not been published within the normal timescale but we are working at pace to announce next year's funding allocations. We want to work on long-term solutions by considering whether changes should be made to the national funding formula and working with Ofsted to consider how outcomes for children with SEND can better demonstrate inclusion. Nothing says more about the state of our nation than the wellbeing of our children, which has been a casualty under the last Government. The Labour Government aims to rebuild opportunities for our children through bold ambitions.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.