← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Ukraine: Non-recognition of Russian-occupied Territories

29 January 2026

Lead MP

Alex Sobel
Leeds Central and Headingley
Lab/Co-op

Responding Minister

Stephen Doughty

Tags

Ukraine
Word Count: 13804
Other Contributors: 17

At a Glance

Alex Sobel raised concerns about ukraine: non-recognition of russian-occupied territories in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Maintain non-recognition policies to protect territorial integrity and prevent Russian expansionism. Address human rights violations by condemning Russification efforts and protecting Ukrainian children from abduction and false adoption in Russia.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Alex Sobel Lab/Co-op
Leeds Central and Headingley
Opened the debate
Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine 1,435 days ago. Since Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014, the principle of non-recognition has been paramount to protect international law and prevent dangerous precedents for other states wishing to change borders through military aggression. The occupied territories are some of the least free places in the world with over 100,000 civilians killed as of January 2026.

Government Response

Stephen Doughty
The Minister of State, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Government Response
Discussed his recent visit to the Baltic states, emphasised the historical importance of recognising Russian-occupied territories as temporarily occupied, highlighted the brutality of attacks on Ukraine including civilian targets, and outlined additional support for humanitarian concerns including £20 million for energy security and resilience.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.