← Back to Westminster Hall Debates
Firearms Licence Holders: Mandatory Medical Markers
28 January 2026
Lead MP
Helen Maguire
Epsom and Ewell
LD
Responding Minister
Mike Tapp
Tags
No tags
Word Count: 9379
Other Contributors: 8
At a Glance
Helen Maguire raised concerns about firearms licence holders: mandatory medical markers in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.
Key Requests to Government:
Calls for mandatory use of medical markers in GP records for firearm licence holders and improved communication between doctors, patients, and law enforcement to safeguard public safety.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
In 2021, Sophie Martyn was one of six people in Plymouth who lost their lives in a mass killing. At the inquest it emerged that the murderer’s GP had not placed a marker on the medical notes as requested by the police, leading to public safety concerns. A survey found that 87% of existing certificate holders believe GPs should inform the police if they become aware of changes that could impact safe gun ownership.
Edward Morello
Con
West Dorset
Acknowledged the loss suffered by families in tragedies related to firearm misuse. Highlighted flaws in the voluntary system of medical markers and argued for their mandatory implementation. Emphasised the potential risk of not making the marker compulsory, advocating for de-risking from future tragedies. Stressed the evidence supporting the proposal for mandatory medical markers and highlighted police agreement with the measure.
Gregory Stafford
Con
Farnham and Bordon
Supports the debate's focus on rural communities and the need for careful rule-making. Emphasises the importance of monitoring the efficacy of current systems to ensure only suitable individuals hold firearms licences.
Helen Maguire
Lab
Waveney
Questioned the necessity of mandatory use if the current uptake is satisfactory and there are no additional costs.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
Compliments Helen Maguire for bringing the issue forward. Acknowledges Northern Ireland's robust firearms licensing system with medical checks and suggests liaising with shooting organisations for insight.
Mark Garnier
Con
Wyre Forest
Agrees with the points made about the firearms licensing regime, noting that a centralised system could be beneficial. Highlights the importance of medical fitness assessments in pilots' licences as an example.
Defended the government's position on not mandating the digital marker, suggesting it is being used effectively without compulsion.
Rachel Gilmour
Con
Tiverton and Minehead
As vice-chair of a rural business association APPG, supports centralising the licensing system to enhance public safety and prevent tragedies like those in Plymouth. Emphasises that this is not about restricting lawful ownership but enhancing checks. Supported mandatory medical markers, noting that 70% of firearms licence holders support it and among the wider public, support is at 86%. Draws on her rural experience, highlighting the need for evidence-led approaches in implementing mandatory medical markers and addressing data silos. Raised valuable points about rural communities in support of making the medical marker mandatory.
North Cotswolds
Clarifies that doctors do not make decisions about firearm licences but can provide critical information. Questions why there is inconsistency in medical checks for driving and firearms. He has campaigned for medical markers for over 20 years. He supports a strict licensing system that works effectively, highlighting the importance of medical markers in preventing tragic incidents such as those at Epsom college. Supports the idea of a more centralised licensing system to improve efficiency and consistency across forces. Discusses recent fee increases and the need for gradual updates rather than large shocks, also suggesting alignment with police force reforms. Asked if mandatory medical markers would introduce a check between the granting and renewal of firearm licences. Saddened that the Minister is not making the digital marker compulsory, citing weak public safety and ineffective system due to non-use by many GPs. Provided personal insights and continued campaigning on the issue of mandatory medical markers for firearm licence holders.
Government Response
Mike Tapp
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department
Government Response
The Minister reassured MPs that work continues to make the firearms licensing system robust, prioritising public safety while acknowledging the majority of firearm license holders do not cause concern. He detailed improvements in medical checks and introduced a digital firearms marker on GP patient records since November 2021. The data shows encouraging engagement with the process by most GPs. Confirmed that the digital firearms marker is being used effectively by most GPs and will not be made mandatory. Announced a public consultation on strengthening shotgun licensing controls, citing recent serious incidents involving shotguns.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About Westminster Hall Debates
Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.