← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Firearms Licence Holders: Mandatory Medical Markers

28 January 2026

Lead MP

Helen Maguire
Epsom and Ewell
LD

Responding Minister

Mike Tapp

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 9379
Other Contributors: 8

At a Glance

Helen Maguire raised concerns about firearms licence holders: mandatory medical markers in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

Calls for mandatory use of medical markers in GP records for firearm licence holders and improved communication between doctors, patients, and law enforcement to safeguard public safety.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Epsom and Ewell
Opened the debate
In 2021, Sophie Martyn was one of six people in Plymouth who lost their lives in a mass killing. At the inquest it emerged that the murderer’s GP had not placed a marker on the medical notes as requested by the police, leading to public safety concerns. A survey found that 87% of existing certificate holders believe GPs should inform the police if they become aware of changes that could impact safe gun ownership.

Government Response

Mike Tapp
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department
Government Response
The Minister reassured MPs that work continues to make the firearms licensing system robust, prioritising public safety while acknowledging the majority of firearm license holders do not cause concern. He detailed improvements in medical checks and introduced a digital firearms marker on GP patient records since November 2021. The data shows encouraging engagement with the process by most GPs. Confirmed that the digital firearms marker is being used effectively by most GPs and will not be made mandatory. Announced a public consultation on strengthening shotgun licensing controls, citing recent serious incidents involving shotguns.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.