← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Key Stage 1 Curriculum

26 January 2026

Lead MP

Roz Savage
South Cotswolds
LD

Responding Minister

Olivia Bailey

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 13137
Other Contributors: 19

At a Glance

Roz Savage raised concerns about key stage 1 curriculum in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The Government should look at bringing a forest school approach into classrooms, and ensure that playgrounds in constituencies like Hastings and Rye are properly maintained so that children can enjoy them. Play-based learning is essential for childhood development and should be integrated into the curriculum as a planned, teacher-guided pedagogy.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

South Cotswolds
Opened the debate
England is an outlier as the only nation with no statutory expectation that play-based learning should continue beyond age five. The Government’s response to a petition with over 106,000 signatures appears to misunderstand the distinction between enrichment and play-based learning. The current model works well for perhaps 10% of pupils but not for the majority due to its misalignment with how children's brains work.

Government Response

Olivia Bailey
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education
Government Response
Minister emphasises the Government's commitment to supporting play through investments in playgrounds and free breakfast clubs, noting £18 million allocated towards upgrading 200 playgrounds across the country. She also highlights plans for a new core enrichment offer to be provided by every school and college. Acknowledged the importance of play but argued against mandating it at key stage 1, citing teacher flexibility. Mentioned that play is part of the EYFS curriculum.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.