← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Children and Young People with Cancer

08 January 2025

Lead MP

Clive Jones
Wokingham
LD

Responding Minister

Sir Stephen Timms

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 3887
Other Contributors: 5

At a Glance

Clive Jones raised concerns about children and young people with cancer in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The hon. Member requests the government to reconsider the three-month qualifying period for disability benefits such as Personal Independence Payments (PIP) and Disability Living Allowance (DLA), arguing that it is cruel and inappropriate in the case of children and young people with cancer.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Wokingham
Opened the debate
Cancer causes significant emotional, physical and mental pain for young patients. The costs of having cancer are substantial for children, young people and their families, including travel, food, energy, and other additional monthly expenses amounting to £700 on average per patient and family from day one.

Government Response

Sir Stephen Timms
The Minister for Social Security and Disability
Government Response
The Minister acknowledges the debate's focus on disability living allowance and personal independence payment support for children and young people with cancer. He notes that these benefits contribute to extra costs but do not cover all expenses, providing an average award of around £155 per week for about 3,000 children under 16 and 2,000 between 16 and 24. While he cannot announce a significant change to the qualifying period currently, he indicates that these matters will be kept under review.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.