← Back to Westminster Hall Debates

Free-to-air Broadcasting: Cricket Participation

09 September 2025

Lead MP

Max Wilkinson
Cheltenham
LD

Responding Minister

Stephanie Peacock

Tags

No tags
Word Count: 8223
Other Contributors: 11

At a Glance

Max Wilkinson raised concerns about free-to-air broadcasting: cricket participation in Westminster Hall. A government minister responded.

Key Requests to Government:

The debate calls for the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) to consider the balance between seeking new audiences and maintaining traditional county cricket, acknowledging its importance for both participation and player development.

How the Debate Unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:

Lead Contributor

Cheltenham
Opened the debate
The English cricket calendar has undergone significant changes in recent years, with the introduction of the Hundred competition and reduced availability of four-day county cricket. This shift has led to a crowded season that may be alienating long-standing cricket fans while reducing access for younger audiences who are not engaged with short-form formats. Additionally, it is argued that this change impacts player development and preparation for test matches.

Government Response

Stephanie Peacock
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
Government Response
She recognized cricket's importance and highlighted government investment in the sport through annual investments by Sport England. She mentioned £11.6 million over five years to the ECB for grassroots initiatives. The Government have committed £1.5 million in capital funding for two new cricket domes, in addition to a further £400 million investment in grassroots sports facilities. The Minister highlights the importance of balancing free-to-air broadcasting with commercial viability for sporting bodies.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy

About Westminster Hall Debates

Westminster Hall debates are a chance for MPs to raise important issues affecting their constituents and get a response from a government minister. Unlike Prime Minister's Questions, these debates are more in-depth and collaborative. The MP who secured the debate speaks first, other MPs can contribute, and a minister responds with the government's position.