<-- Back to proposed bills
Courts and Tribunals Bill - Sitting 1
25 March 2026
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
John Hayes, the chairman of the Public Bill Committee, outlines the procedures and schedules for the hearing of witnesses regarding the Courts and Tribunals Bill. The statement discusses the effectiveness of court systems and the need for further modelling and coordination among criminal justice agencies. Sir Brian Leveson discusses the inefficiencies and cultural changes needed in the criminal court system to address the backlog of cases. John Hayes is addressing the Courts and Tribunals Bill committee regarding the scheduling of questions and witnesses. The statement addresses concerns about delays in justice and their impact on victim survivors and families bereaved by homicide. Claire Waxman discusses the need for structural reform in the court system to address long delays faced by victims of crimes. The discussion revolves around the structural reforms needed in the Crown court to address its overburdened state and the impact of removing cases from the jury list. The statement discusses the impact of proposed jury trial reforms on victims and the concerns raised by a letter signed by victims. The discussion centres on the proposed Courts and Tribunals Bill and its potential impact on victims' experiences during cross-examination, particularly in cases involving triable either-way offences. The statement addresses reforms proposed by the Courts and Tribunals Bill related to rape trials and domestic abuse cases. The statement addresses delays in the justice system and their impact on victims. The statement discusses the transparency and fairness of the UK court system, focusing on issues faced by victims of domestic abuse and sexual violence. John Hayes discusses the impact of delays and uncertainties in the court process on victims and survivors. The statement discusses reforms aimed at improving support for victims of sexual offenses and addressing issues within the criminal justice system. The statement discusses proposed changes to the appeals process from magistrates court to Crown court under the Courts and Tribunals Bill. John Hayes is thanking witnesses for their valuable evidence regarding the impact of court adjournments and floating cases on victims, particularly in the context of the Courts and Tribunals Bill.
Action Requested
Hayes ensures that copies of written evidence will be available in the Committee Room and reminds members to declare any relevant interests during their questions or speeches. He also introduces Sir Brian Leveson as the first witness to testify before the committee, setting a time limit for the session until 9:55 am.
Key Facts
- John Hayes is the chairman of the Public Bill Committee.
- The Committee will hear oral evidence from witnesses according to a scheduled timetable on Wednesday, 25 March.
- Sir Brian Leveson is introduced as the first witness and will testify until 9:55 am.
- Sir Brian Leveson is aware of Liverpool’s court system and its unique characteristics.
- He recommends creating a criminal justice adviser to coordinate work among agencies in other parts of the country.
- The report suggests that more detailed modelling by the Ministry of Justice will be needed, which was partially undertaken but rejected by Sir Brian.
- Judges are facing delays of up to 2028-2029 for trials.
- Defendants are gaming the system, delaying guilty pleas until convenient dates.
- A permission test for appeals from magistrates' courts is proposed as a proportionate and fair response to current needs.
- John Hayes aims to include more Committee members in the questioning process.
- Witnesses introduced are Claire Waxman, Professor Katrin Hohl, and Dame Vera Baird.
- Cases are now going well into 2030 due to delays.
- Justice delayed means lack of security, safety, and closure for victims.
- A letter signed by 18 victim survivors was sent last week opposing long waits for justice.
- Victim attrition has increased by more than 5% in the past five years.
- On average, 40% of victims withdraw from the system in London due to delays.
- Victims are waiting years to give evidence in court.
- Training for judges on rape cases has been reduced from three days to two days.
- A male victim of child sex abuse has been in the system since 2021 with adjournments extended until 2029.
- Claire Waxman expresses concern about the overburdened state of the Crown court.
- Vera Baird discusses the need for structural reforms in the justice system, particularly regarding jury trials and their impact on victims' rights.
- Charlotte Nichols waited 1,088 days to get her case heard before being acquitted; she later won compensation in a civil court judge trial.
- The proposed reforms are seen as creating operational disruption and prolonging uncertainty for victims.
- A letter signed by 18 victims is mentioned, focusing on the impact of reforms on defendants who are women.
- Charlotte's testimony is referenced regarding the use of victim voices to advocate for reforms.
- Over 90% of domestic abuse cases are already heard in magistrates' courts.
- The Bill does not affect indictable-only offences such as rape and sexual assault.
- Victims feel that cross-examination can be brutal and undermines their credibility.
- The majority of rape defendants are not in custody, leading to long trial wait times.
- About 64% of people who elect for a trial plead guilty before reaching the trial stage.
- The Institute for Government has corrected its figures from 2% up to around 9% or higher.
- Victims experienced significant delays of up to 1,317 days between report and court.
- Delays led to severe emotional distress, suffering, and anxiety for victims.
- Recording of magistrates courts is a proposed measure to increase transparency.
- Victims often feel that perpetrators have more control over court proceedings than they do.
- There is a lack of transparency in the court system, particularly regarding recording and access to transcripts.
- Family court processes are currently out of scope for the Courts and Tribunals Bill.
- John Hayes acknowledges the shock experienced by victims due to high costs of court transcripts.
- The Government has moved to make sentencing remarks available from spring next year.
- There is an amendment going to the House of Commons today about bail decisions and jury deliberations.
- Only 2% of Rape Assessment and Safeguarding Offender (RASSO) cases receive a guilty verdict.
- Victims' sentencing remarks are now available for all victims, not just rape victims.
- The Bill aims to remove the defendant’s right to elect trial types, empowering victims.
- There is a call for dedicated time slots for rape trials to prevent them from becoming 'floating trials.'
- Victims may face re-traumatisation if they have to give evidence again at a Crown court appeal.
- Changing the system strengthens the credibility of magistrates courts, making them the final decision-makers unless new evidence emerges.
- There is no right for victims to appeal in cases where there was a not guilty verdict.
- Witnesses provided evidence on the impact of court adjournments and floating cases on victims.
- The session concluded with a thank you from John Hayes to the panel for their contributions.
- The Committee is scheduled to meet again at 2 pm in the Boothroyd Room.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy