<-- Back to proposed bills
Regulatory Impact Assessments Bill
20 October 2023
Type
Bill Debate
At a Glance
Issue Summary
Christopher Chope discusses the Regulatory Impact Assessments Bill which aims to ensure proper regulatory impact assessments are conducted before legislation and statutory instruments are introduced. Christopher Chope discusses the importance of publishing Regulatory Impact Assessments before legislation and criticizes recent changes in business impact rules by the government. The statement discusses the need for reforming the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 to ensure democratic checks and balances in future emergencies. Christopher Chope discusses the importance of Regulatory Impact Assessments in government decision-making. Christopher Chope discusses the lack of proper impact assessments and scrutiny regarding the restoration and renewal (R&R) of Parliament. The speaker discusses the potential flaws in conducting cost-benefit analyses and impact assessments for legislative measures. The debate围绕是否在所有情况下都需要进行影响评估,特别是在紧急立法时。 Christopher Chope discusses the need for cost-benefit analyses and regulatory impact assessments in government decision-making processes. Philip Davies expresses concerns about the Regulatory Impact Assessments Bill, particularly regarding the power it gives to unelected civil servants and bodies. The statement discusses the importance of holding the government accountable through proper scrutiny of legislation, emphasizing the need for cost-benefit analysis and independent assessments. Christopher Chope discusses the Regulatory Impact Assessments Bill and questions what sanctions should be in place for failing to comply with impact assessment requirements. The statement discusses the Regulatory Impact Assessments Bill and its intent to formalise impact assessments as statutory requirements for legislation. The MP is questioning whether the previous government's regulatory impact rules, such as 'one in, one out' and 'one in, two out', are still being applied by the current government. The statement discusses the importance and evolution of regulatory impact assessments in supporting better regulation and economic growth. The statement discusses the importance of Regulatory Impact Assessments and constraints on government power.
Action Requested
Chope proposes that his Bill requires Ministers to lay a qualifying regulatory impact assessment for any Bill, draft statutory instrument, or statutory instrument made by a Minister. He suggests an embarrassment clause if the duty is not complied with.
Key Facts
- The Regulatory Impact Assessments Bill aims to improve legislation quality and transparency.
- Clause 1 sets out requirements for Ministers to produce regulatory impact assessments before introducing Bills or statutory instruments.
- Clause 2 proposes a sanction for non-compliance, involving statements in Parliament until compliance is achieved.
- The Climate Change Bill was voted against by Chope and a colleague due to high potential costs.
- Despite promises of no increase in business regulation costs, the Regulatory Policy Committee reported a £14.3 billion total increase as of February 2023.
- The government has changed its rules on calculating regulatory impacts on businesses.
- The Government's own report predicted over 200,000 lives could be lost due to lockdown measures.
- Professor Mark Woolhouse described lockdowns as a failure of public health policy.
- Parliament was effectively rendered impotent under the Public Health Act during the first lockdown implementation.
- The Government is planning to house 2,000 illegal migrants at the former RAF Scampton base in Chope's constituency without clear impact assessments.
- West Lindsey District Council put a stop notice on the Home Office regarding environmental issues but it was ignored.
- HS2 railway project is considered one of the biggest wastes of public money with no proper impact assessment.
- If there is a complete decant of Parliament, it will likely take between five and seven years to build the new structure.
- Works could not begin earlier than 2029 if a full decant is chosen.
- The Government admitted they did not do a cost-benefit analysis for the most restrictive measures during the pandemic.
- The economic consequences and impact on NHS waiting times were predictable but ignored.
- Experts advising the government failed to consider the impact of voluntary behavioral changes.
- Christopher Chope提到他的法案可能在某些情况下不被完全支持。
- Kevin Hollinrake提到在今年早些时候,由于全国范围内的罢工行动,经济面临停滞的风险。
- Chope was among those who supported objectors wanting more of the HS2 track in tunnels.
- He argues for additional impact assessments during the course of projects.
- Davies expresses doubt about the independence of the Regulatory Policy Committee.
- He praises the Minister for being a man of his own mind, unlike some civil servants.
- Davies is concerned that handing over more power to unelected bodies could lead to biased assessments.
- The Climate Change Act was passed with little interest in cost-benefit analysis.
- Previous Governments manipulated figures for political advantage, leading George Osborne to establish the Office for Budget Responsibility.
- The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee report from October 2022 highlights issues with impact assessments.
- The Regulatory Policy Committee reports that around a quarter of all impact assessments are not fit for purpose.
- No sanctions appear to be applied when departments fail to comply with IA procedures.
- The Bill aims to bring Ministers before Parliament every three days to explain the lack of an impact assessment, which is seen as an unnecessary pressure.
- Kevin Hollinrake supports the intent behind Christopher Chope's Bill.
- The better regulation framework will consider impacts even before drafting new legislation.
- Over 1,000 pieces of legislation have been reformed or revoked as part of ongoing reforms.
- The taskforce on innovation, growth and regulatory reform has made 69 recommendations, with 10 already implemented and 49 under consideration.
- The rule was introduced when David Cameron was Prime Minister.
- The rule was increased to a 'one in, two out'.
- The UK's approach to impact assessments scores highly compared to other OECD members.
- A call for evidence has been launched on the regulatory landscape as a whole.
- Consultations have been published regarding the Competition and Markets Authority, energy regulation, and an independent review of the Civil Aviation Authority.
- Christopher Chope thanks participants in the debate.
- The amendment of the Public Health Act is mentioned as an example of abuse of power.
- Lord Sumption's quote about government powers and restraint is cited.
- The Climate Change Act 2008 and associated pressure on MPs to conform are referenced.
- The debate is adjourned, with a resumption date set for Friday 27 October.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy