<-- Back to proposed bills
United Kingdom Internal Market Bill
10 December 2020
Type
Bill Debate
At a Glance
Issue Summary
Rosie Winterton is addressing the consideration of amendments from the House of Lords regarding the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill. Paul Scully discusses the progress and challenges in addressing amendments to the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill. The statement addresses amendments to the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and discusses the UK Government's intention to work collaboratively with devolved Administrations on investment and subsidy control. MP Ed Miliband discusses the implications of amendments to the UK Internal Market Bill regarding common frameworks and devolved powers. The statement discusses concerns over the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its potential impact on sovereignty and judicial powers. The statement discusses amendments to the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, specifically addressing the need for consent from devolved administrations and the protection of common frameworks. Rosie Winterton addresses concerns about the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its impact on devolution settlements. The speaker criticizes the UK government for disregarding devolved administrations' legislative consent and seeks support for an amendment ensuring Westminster spending in devolved areas requires local approval. The statement addresses concerns about the impact of the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill on Scotland's devolution settlement and its potential to undermine democratic processes in Scotland. The statement addresses concerns about the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its impact on mutual recognition between the four nations of the UK. The statement is about voting on amendments related to the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill.
Action Requested
The speaker announces specific actions regarding the acceptance, disagreement, and proposal of certain amendments to the UK Internal Market Bill. She indicates that financial privilege is engaged by two amendments (48B and 48C).
Key Facts
- Financial privilege is engaged by Lords amendments 48B and 48C.
- The House disagrees with the Lords in their amendments 1B, 1C, 1D, 48B, and 48C.
- The House agrees with the Lords in amendments 8B, 8C, 8D, 8F, 8G, 8H, 8J, and 8K but disagrees with amendment 8L.
- The House insists on disagreement with amendments 13, 52 to 54, and 56.
- The Government is removing clauses 44, 45, and 47 from the Bill.
- Clauses 42, 43, and 46 have been agreed upon to protect Northern Ireland's place in the UK customs territory and internal market.
- Amendments 1B, 1C, and 1D could create broad exclusions that deny clarity about terms of trade for businesses and consumers.
- The Government will work collaboratively with the devolved Administrations to support citizens across the UK.
- Lords amendments 48B, 48C, and 50C are seen as unnecessary by the Minister.
- A UK-wide investment framework detailing objectives and administration of the shared prosperity fund will be published in spring.
- The law-breaking powers undermining the UK's reputation have been removed.
- Common frameworks are proposed as an alternative to the current approach in the Bill.
- Amendments seek to preserve higher standards in different nations where justified.
- City deals are worked out jointly with devolved Administrations.
- The Government overturned amendments made by the House of Lords regarding the Bill.
- The Scottish Parliament and Welsh Senedd have voted to withhold legislative consent on the Bill.
- Lords amendments 48B and 48C deal with shared prosperity fund agreements between devolved Governments.
- Lords amendments 8B to 8L, 13A and 56A require Secretary of State consent from devolved Administrations before exercising powers.
- Amendments seek to protect the role of common frameworks in the Bill as per Lord Hope's advice.
- Former Lord Chief Justices and a former party leader expressed concern about areas of legal breach.
- Winterton has tabled amendments for devolved Administration input into the CMA.
- The Lords have made amendments to the common framework and functioning of the Office for the Internal Market.
- Winterton finds it frustrating that the Government refuses these changes without providing real-life examples of cross-sector issues.
- The Prime Minister is perceived as anti-Scottish and prioritizes Westminster sovereignty over devolved powers.
- Amendment 48 aims to ensure any Westminster spending in devolved areas requires local consent.
- There is a lack of clarity regarding the Shared Prosperity Fund, which was meant to replace European funds.
- Northern Ireland is allegedly sorted out in terms of the Bill.
- According to Lord Hope, initially seen as an exaggeration, the Bill does indeed undermine devolution.
- Lord Thomas warned that without amendments, the UK Government could bypass devolved Governments and Parliaments.
- The Scottish Parliament voted against the Bill with a margin of 90 to 28 MSPs.
- The Government's position on breaking international law has affected Britain’s standing in the world.
- Mutual recognition clauses are embedded in the Bill, affecting negotiations with other countries using the lowest standards among UK nations.
- 95% of Cumbrian farm exports go to the single market within the United Kingdom.
- The House divided multiple times during the voting process.
- Ayes were recorded at 356 for one vote and 357 for another.
- Committees were appointed to draw up reasons for disagreeing with certain Lords' amendments.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy