<-- Back to proposed bills
National Security and Investment Bill - Sitting 10 (Afternoon)
08 December 2020
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement discusses Clause 29 of the National Security and Investment Bill, focusing on the publication of notices of final orders and the balance between commercial sensitivity and public interest. Graham Brady discusses amendments related to financial assistance and reporting requirements under the National Security and Investment Bill. Chi Onwurah discusses amendments to improve the National Security and Investment Bill, focusing on financial assistance for businesses affected by interim orders. The statement addresses the National Security and Investment Bill's provisions for financial assistance. The discussion revolves around the National Security and Investment Bill, particularly concerning financial assistance during interim orders and support for businesses in distress. The amendment seeks to require the Secretary of State to provide reasons and an assessment of impacts when publishing directions under the National Security and Investment Bill. The statement addresses how national security and competition concerns may intersect in mergers under the National Security and Investment Bill. The statement discusses enforcement measures within the National Security and Investment Bill, focusing on penalties for non-compliance with regulations. The statement discusses clauses 40 to 47 of the National Security and Investment Bill which cover civil sanctions including monetary penalties for non-compliance with orders under the regime. Graham Brady discusses an amendment to extend the period for judicial review applications from 28 days to three months. Alan Whitehead discusses concerns regarding the judicial review provisions of the National Security and Investment Bill, specifically the shortened timeframe of 28 days compared to the standard three-month period. The statement discusses the National Security and Investment Bill's judicial review procedures, specifically the shortened time limit for certain decisions. MP Graham Brady discusses clauses 50, 51, and 52 of the National Security and Investment Bill. The statement discusses clauses related to appeals against penalty notices, variation notices, and costs associated with monetary penalties under the National Security and Investment Bill, as well as extraterritorial application for offences.
Action Requested
Nadhim Zahawi reassures Chi Onwurah that the Secretary of State will always consider the public interest when deciding whether to redact information for commercial or national security reasons. The Minister argues against including explicit references to the public interest in the Bill, as it could confuse and stretch its scope beyond its intended focus on national security.
Key Facts
- Clause 29 requires the Secretary of State to publish a notice when a final order has been made, varied or revoked.
- Subsection (3)(a) allows redaction if publishing would prejudice commercial interests.
- Amendment 27 proposes preventing redactions unless publication is in the public interest.
- Amendment 24 would enable the Secretary of State to give financial assistance for interim or final orders.
- Amendment 28 mandates reporting to Parliament if financial assistance exceeds £100 million in a calendar year.
- Clause 30 provides financial assistance through loans, guarantees or indemnities for entities affected by final orders.
- The clause requires a report to Parliament if financial assistance totals £100 million in any financial year.
- No limit on the amount of financial assistance provided under clause 30.
- Clause 30 provides legal authority for the Secretary of State to provide financial assistance after a final order has been made.
- Financial assistance can be given only with Treasury consent and subject to appropriate safeguards.
- Amendment 28 would require reporting if financial assistance exceeds £100 million in any calendar or financial year.
- Chi Onwurah highlights concerns about interim orders not providing adequate time for financial assistance.
- Matt Western points out the importance of support for larger organizations beyond SMEs experiencing financial difficulties.
- The Minister mentions ongoing communication with various companies, including those in distress due to losing clients.
- The amendment targets the need for clarity and alignment between the new investment security unit in BEIS and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).
- Public interest intervention notice regimes allow the Secretary of State to direct the CMA.
- Businesses seek assurances on clear guidance on how the merger control process will operate under the new regime.
- The clause enables the Secretary of State to direct the CMA to take or not take a particular course of action.
- Directions must be transparent and published by the Secretary of State.
- Consultation with the CMA is required before giving a direction.
- Clauses 32 to 36 focus on enforcement and appeal mechanisms.
- Clause 32 establishes an offence for completing notifiable acquisitions without approval.
- Clause 33 makes it an offence to breach interim or final orders.
- Clause 34 addresses compliance with information notices and attendance notices.
- Clause 35 provides a defence for lawful use of disclosed information.
- Clause 36 ensures individuals are responsible for corporate offences.
- Clause 40 provides the Secretary of State with the power to impose monetary penalties on a person who has committed an offence under clauses 32 to 34.
- The maximum fixed penalty and daily rate penalty are set out in clause 41, intended as deterrents against disregarding legal requirements that could jeopardize national security.
- Clause 44 enables the Secretary of State to enforce monetary penalties by making unpaid penalties recoverable through court order methods.
- Amendment 26 seeks to extend the period for judicial review applications from 28 days to three months.
- Relevant decisions specified in various clauses include power to require information, witness attendance, data protection, and CMA information.
- The amendment concerns the procedure for judicial review of certain decisions as detailed in clause 49.
- The Bill reduces the timeframe for judicial review from three months under standard rules to 28 days.
- Skeleton arguments in judicial reviews must be provided within 21 working days according to civil procedure rules.
- Getting the starting point of the clock ticking correct is crucial for adhering to the reduced timeframe.
- The Bill's Clause 49 sets a 28-day period for judicial review of certain decisions, shorter than the usual three-month period.
- Exceptional circumstances may allow proceedings beyond the 28 days.
- Decisions under the Bill include those relating to screening acquisitions.
- MP Graham Brady discusses clauses 50, 51, and 52 of the National Security and Investment Bill.
- The discussion focuses on procedural aspects including appeals against monetary penalties.
- Clause 50 allows appeal against penalty notices or variation notices within 28 days.
- Court can confirm, reduce, or quash decisions on monetary penalties but cannot increase them.
- Clause 51 provides right of appeal against costs related to monetary penalties.
- Clause 52 grants extraterritorial jurisdiction for offences under the regime.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy