<-- Back to proposed bills
National Security and Investment Bill - Sitting 4
26 November 2020
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement discusses concerns regarding the National Security and Investment Bill's potential impact on economic security versus national security. The MP discusses concerns about the National Security and Investment Bill, focusing on the significant increase in review numbers and its impact on small technology businesses. James Palmer discusses concerns about the National Security and Investment Bill and its potential impact on UK trade and businesses. Graham Brady addresses questions related to the National Security and Investment Bill and its potential impact on market valuations and hostile takeovers. Graham Brady introduces the next witness in the Committee session and provides a brief overview of the National Security and Investment Bill. The speaker discusses the National Security and Investment Bill, suggesting that it should include food security, pharma and biotechnology, energy, research and development, and a broader definition of public interest. The statement discusses the National Security and Investment Bill, focusing on its improvements over previous regulations in protecting national security and public interest. The discussion centres around the National Security and Investment Bill and its implications on business transactions, particularly regarding acquisitions by companies with anonymous beneficial ownership. Graham Brady is chairing the Public Bill Committee session on the National Security and Investment Bill and introduces the witness Creon Butler from Chatham House. Creon Butler discusses the National Security and Investment Bill's approach to updating the Enterprise Act 2002 and addressing evolving national security threats. Creon Butler discusses how the National Security Secretariat (NSS) should be linked with BEIS's new investment security unit, emphasizing the importance of a strategic overview from NSS while acknowledging the operational focus of the new unit. MP Graham Brady is facilitating the Public Bill Committee session on the National Security and Investment Bill. The statement discusses concerns about the National Security and Investment Bill's potential impact on inward investment in the UK, particularly regarding uncertainty for companies seeking to raise finance or attract investors. Graham Brady is concluding the Public Bill Committee session on the National Security and Investment Bill.
Action Requested
No specific actions are requested. The speaker highlights the need for clear distinctions between economic security and national security in the legislation, noting that it may be difficult to navigate issues of supply chain dependency and economic influence while ensuring proper regulation of foreign investments.
Key Facts
- James Palmer is a senior partner at Herbert Smith Freehills.
- Palmer advised on SoftBank’s £24 billion takeover of Arm.
- The Bill could see notifications increase from 12 to potentially 90 or 100, with an estimated impact assessment predicting up to 1,870 notifications under the new regime.
- The number of reviews is projected to increase from 12 in nearly 20 years to nearly 2,000 a year.
- There are concerns about the impact on small technology businesses due to the lack of a de minimis threshold in certain sectors like communications and artificial intelligence.
- The MP emphasizes the need for clarity and predictability for investors to maintain the UK's attractiveness as an investment destination.
- Palmer is concerned about broad mandatory filing sectors such as communications.
- There are no de minimises in several sectors identified by Palmer.
- Palmer fears that the bill may catch low-value intellectual property sales, burdening small businesses.
- Graham Brady raises concerns about fewer buyers potentially affecting business valuations due to restrictions from the National Security and Investment Bill.
- The MP supports a proportional approach that balances national security with economic impact.
- He suggests regular reviews of the bill's economic effects to maintain accountability.
- Graham Brady introduces David Offenbach as a consultant solicitor with Simons Muirhead & Burton.
- David Offenbach has extensive experience in takeovers and company governance over many years.
- Offenbach welcomes the Bill but suggests it could be improved for the post-covid, post-Brexit UK.
- The Bill does not define 'national security'.
- Lord Heseltine stated that research and development should be a subject of importance.
- SoftBank’s purchase of Arm, Google's acquisition of DeepMind, Cobham's sale to private equity, and Immarsat's takeover are cited as examples where national assets have been sold off.
- There is twice as much foreign direct investment into Britain compared to France and Germany.
- The National Security and Investment Bill improves upon previous regulations by providing a proper statutory framework for dealing with non-compliance.
- David Offenbach suggests establishing a 'national security investment commission' as a separate statutory body to handle national security issues.
- He advocates for Britain having its own sovereign wealth fund similar to Norway's, which is valued at more than £26,000 per citizen.
- The Bill includes controls on the purchase and acquisition of land and other physical assets as well as companies.
- There are 17 different areas and categories in the Bill to ensure no asset with national security issues slips through the net.
- David Offenbach suggests blocking acquisitions if beneficial ownership cannot be established.
- Graham Brady chairs the Public Bill Committee session.
- The next witness is Creon Butler from Chatham House.
- Creon Butler advises on policy issues including climate change, national resource security, global health security, and economic security.
- The Bill updates legislation necessary due to changes in global economy and threats over 18 years.
- International co-operation should be strengthened beyond Five Eyes, including Japan and EU.
- State-owned enterprises are not inherently more likely to pose a national security risk.
- Creon Butler has experience in the National Security Secretariat (NSS).
- The new investment security unit within BEIS should have a strong operational focus.
- There is a trade-off between review timescales and the number of cases being assessed under the Bill.
- Graham Brady is managing the session of the Public Bill Committee.
- Will Jackson-Moore, a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, is testifying about the impact of the National Security and Investment Bill on international capital flows into the UK.
- There are approximately 6,000 venture capital investments and nearly 10,000 mergers and acquisitions transactions in the UK each year.
- The UK is currently the largest inbound country for venture capital, private equity, and infrastructure investment in Europe.
- Many other European territories have equivalent legislation but differ in application processes.
- The Bill could introduce additional uncertainty that may affect investment decisions.
- The session was finishing slightly ahead of time.
- Michael Tomlinson ordered further consideration be now adjourned at 4 pm.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy