<-- Back to proposed bills

Financial Services Bill - Sitting 7

26 November 2020

Proposing MP
Shipley
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement is about the review process for determining which benchmarks are considered critical under the Financial Services Bill. Pat McFadden is proposing an amendment to ensure financial benchmarks are based on actual trades and contracts, prevent manipulation, and establish robust sanctions for those who manipulate or attempt to manipulate benchmarks. The statement discusses the regulation and oversight of financial benchmarks, specifically LIBOR, and the Government's commitment to ensure accuracy and integrity in benchmark calculations. The statement addresses the Financial Services Bill's Clause 8, which amends regulations for critical benchmarks such as LIBOR. The statement discusses the complexity and challenges associated with moving financial contracts away from benchmarks like LIBOR, particularly when alternative substitutes are not readily available. The statement discusses amendments to Article 21 of the benchmarks regulation concerning the mandatory administration of a critical benchmark like LIBOR. The statement discusses Clause 10 of the Financial Services Bill, which grants the FCA power to prohibit new use of a critical benchmark if the administrator plans to cease providing it. The statement discusses amendments to the Financial Services Bill regarding critical benchmarks, including assessments of representativeness and mandatory contributions. The statement addresses the Financial Services Bill's Clause 13, which outlines the process for designating certain critical benchmarks. Pat McFadden raises concerns about the transition from LIBOR to SONIA or other new benchmarks and the potential risks this poses to market integrity and individual contracts. The statement addresses questions regarding the Financial Services Bill, specifically concerning legacy use of benchmarks and safe harbours.

Action Requested

No specific action is requested in this statement, it serves to remind members of parliamentary procedures and introduces clause 8 on the review of critical benchmarks.

Key Facts

  • The spaces are marked to enforce social distancing.
  • Members should email electronic copies of their speaking notes to hansardnotes@parliament.uk.
  • Amendment 28 aims to address critical benchmarks under the Benchmarks regulation as amended by the Financial Services Bill.
  • The amendment focuses on preventing benchmark manipulation, ensuring robust sanctions including custodial sentences for offenders.
  • LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) manipulation is highlighted as a past issue affecting trillions of pounds' worth of trades.
  • A benchmark is a standard against which the performance of a fund can be measured or by reference to which payments can be calculated.
  • LIBOR reflects interest rates for inter-bank lending and borrowing and is published over seven time periods ranging from overnight up to one year.
  • The FCA has regulated LIBOR since 2013 under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and subsequently under the benchmarks regulation.
  • Clause 8 adds new criteria for designating a benchmark as critical.
  • A quantitative threshold of €400 billion-worth of products has been removed from the existing tests.
  • The industry supports additional safe harbour provisions complementing the Bill's provisions.
  • Contracts face barriers to moving off a benchmark due to bilateral or multilateral agreements.
  • Parties may not be able to achieve consensus for changes in certain situations.
  • The FCA will use its power to recognise critical benchmarks if their cessation would adversely affect market integrity.
  • Article 21 gives the FCA power to compel the provision of a critical benchmark if the administrator intends to cease providing it.
  • Clause 9 extends the maximum compulsion period from five to ten years.
  • The FCA must assess and inform the administrator in writing whether the benchmark is representative or at risk of becoming unrepresentative.
  • Clause 10 inserts article 21A into the benchmarks regulation.
  • The FCA can issue a prohibition notice if an administrator intends to cease providing a critical benchmark.
  • The notice must contain reasons for the prohibition, its effective date, and any additional information deemed necessary by the FCA.
  • Clause 11 introduces new articles 22A and 22B to the benchmarks regulation.
  • New article 22A requires benchmark administrators to assess representativeness every two years or when a contributor proposes to withdraw.
  • Contributors must provide written notification of intent to cease contributing at least 15 weeks ahead, up from four weeks previously.
  • The clause inserts a new article into the benchmarks regulation.
  • It allows the FCA to designate a benchmark if its representativeness cannot reasonably be restored.
  • The FCA must inform the administrator and allow 14 days for representations before proceeding.
  • A notice must be published including reasons, date of effect, and other relevant information.
  • The transition from LIBOR to new benchmarks poses a systemic risk due to trillions of dollars involved.
  • Clause 13 and following clauses allow the FCA to mandate continued legacy use of designated benchmarks despite discontinuation.
  • Without safe harbour provisions, there is a risk of forum shopping or regulatory arbitrage.
  • The Government recognises challenges identified by trade associations regarding safe harbours.
  • International dialogue with US regulatory bodies is ongoing through a regulatory working group.
  • The FCA must produce statements of policy and notices when exercising powers under the Bill.
  • Benchmark administrators have the option to refer matters to the upper tribunal if challenged.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy