<-- Back to proposed bills
Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill
19 October 2020
Type
Bill Debate
At a Glance
Issue Summary
Rosie Winterton is addressing financial privilege issues related to Lords amendments in the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill. The minister discusses amendments related to family reunion arrangements and rights for children in care, rejecting some proposals while agreeing with others. Kevin Foster discusses detention time limits and automatic leave for confirmed victims of modern slavery. The speaker discusses several amendments to the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill addressing issues such as social care impact assessments, refugee family reunion routes, immigration detention limits, fast-tracking settled status for children in care, and rights of UK citizens returning from EU. The statement discusses the impact of the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill on victims of human trafficking, particularly EEA and Swiss nationals. The statement addresses the need for reform in legislation regarding victims of modern slavery, particularly concerning their access to public funds and discretionary leave to remain. Rosie Winterton addresses Lords amendments to the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, focusing on family unity, asylum seekers' rights, vulnerable groups, and the care sector. Karen Bradley discusses amendments related to the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, focusing on measures for victims of human trafficking and modern slavery. The speaker discusses the Home Office's response to the Windrush scandal and its failure to address concerns raised by community organizations regarding Lords amendment 5 of the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill. Rosie Winterton discusses the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, focusing on ending free movement of people and the impact on social care. The statement discusses concerns over the UK's Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, particularly regarding amendments from the Lords to improve immigration rules and support for vulnerable groups. Alistair Carmichael discusses Lords amendments to the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, particularly focusing on improvements related to care sector wages, digital exclusion, indefinite detention of immigrants, and wrongful detentions. The statement addresses the importance of amending the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill to ensure a safe and legal route for vulnerable children, particularly unaccompanied minors who have lost their parents due to conflict or persecution. The statement discusses the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, focusing on amendments related to proof of status documents, indefinite detention, and support for victims of modern slavery. The statement addresses the impact of ending free movement on healthcare workers and social care providers, highlighting concerns about underpayment and potential restrictions on migration. The statement addresses Lords amendment 5, which aims to ensure EU citizens receive physical proof of settled status upon request. The statement discusses amendments to the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill focusing on ensuring that eligible children in care or entitled to care leavers' support receive automatic indefinite leave to remain under the EU settlement scheme. The speaker supports the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, arguing against opposition claims that immigration is necessary to solve labour shortages in social care. The speaker addresses the Lords amendments to the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, arguing against the proposed changes that would undermine fairness in immigration policy. The speaker criticizes the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill for its negative impact on EU nationals and key workers in social care. Rosie Winterton is discussing the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, addressing concerns about family reunion rights for EU citizens and the impact of the proposed immigration system on care workers. Shaun Bailey discusses the Social Care Workers (Immigration) Amendment, expressing concerns about linking social care debates with migration issues and advocating for a fair immigration system without creating a two-tier system. The statement discusses concerns regarding the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, particularly focusing on undocumented children in the care system and the cost implications for local authorities. The statement discusses various aspects of the Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill, including social care, modern slavery, family reunion and resettlement, children in care, detention policies, and digital documentation. This statement is about the parliamentary procedure for voting on amendments to a bill.
Action Requested
Winterton requests that the House discusses several Lords amendments and Government motions, setting an initial six-minute limit for speeches from Back Benchers to allow more Members to contribute due to time pressure.
Key Facts
- Financial privilege is engaged by Lords amendments 4 and 5.
- The Bill aims to end EU rules on free movement and implement a points-based immigration system.
- Skills for Care and the Migration Advisory Committee provide independent reporting on migration issues.
- Lords amendment 2 seeks to provide lifetime rights for British citizens resident in EEA or Switzerland before the transition period to return to the UK accompanied by non-British close family members under EU free movement law terms.
- The government provides extensive support to local authorities, including a grant funding of up to £17 million for organisations across the UK to assist vulnerable groups in applying to the scheme.
- Since 2010, more than 44,000 children seeking protection have been granted leave through the asylum system and resettlement schemes.
- The government is considering reforming the detention system for quicker decisions.
- No European country has adopted a time limit as short as 28 days proposed by amendments.
- Last year, the Government paid £7 million to 272 people who were wrongfully detained.
- Lords amendment 1 would require an independent assessment of the impact on social care sector from ending free movement.
- Unison supports workers throughout the pandemic with its 'care after covid' campaign.
- Amendment 4 aims to ensure safe refugee family reunion routes post-Dublin III.
- The Dublin III regulation allows legal pathways for children seeking asylum in the UK.
- Lords amendment 6 would limit detention periods to 28 days and mandate judicial scrutiny.
- There are estimated 5,000 looked-after children and 4,000 care leavers needing settled status applications.
- Amendment 2 guarantees the right of UK citizens returning from EU with close family without financial restrictions.
- Amendment 5 provides physical proof of status for EEA and Swiss citizens registered through the EU settlement scheme.
- Lords amendment 5 is being urged not to be adopted.
- Lords amendment 9 provides at least 12 months' leave to remain and access to benefits for confirmed victims of human trafficking from EEA or Swiss national backgrounds.
- Victims of modern slavery will face an undefined legal vacuum after the UK-EU transition period ends on December 31.
- The Centre for Social Justice published a document that pushed the Government into passing modern-day slavery legislation.
- A recent report titled “It still happens here: Fighting UK Slavery in the 2020s” highlights barriers to moving victims on safely due to lack of recourse to public funds.
- Lord McColl’s amendment inserted a paragraph into guidance after its passage, rectifying contradictions.
- Victims of modern slavery receive no leave to remain despite being confirmed as such, whereas refugees get five years' leave to remain.
- The UK has some of the most restrictive family visa rules, splitting up tens of thousands of British citizens from their spouses and children.
- Lords amendment 2 aims to protect families by exempting a fixed and finite cohort from new immigration rules forever.
- Lords amendment 4 seeks to protect unaccompanied children seeking asylum in the UK's best interests or with family connections here.
- Lords amendment 3 would fast-track access to settled status for children in care and care leavers, reducing future uncertainty.
- Victims of modern slavery should be granted immigration leave without entering detention centres unnecessarily.
- ECPAT published a freedom of information request finding only 28 children confirmed as victims of trafficking granted discretionary leave to remain between 2016 and 2019.
- The Modern Slavery Act 2015 is described as an excellent, groundbreaking and world-leading Act.
- Bishop Desmond Tutu's quote highlights the need for upstream solutions to prevent people from falling into the 'river'.
- The Home Office published its comprehensive improvement plan last month.
- Newham had 91,000 EU settlement scheme applications submitted, the highest number among all local authorities.
- Romanians account for about a third of Newham's total applications under the EU settlement scheme.
- In Romania, only 61% of people were regular internet users and only 28% had basic digital skills by 2018 (compared to EU averages).
- Only 3% of Roma Support Group clients in Newham can complete an online application independently, and only 20% have access to IT devices at home.
- Nicoleta is a single mother who paid someone to help her with the EU settlement scheme application but later faced issues accessing her digital status statement.
- Nicolaie works in construction and faced difficulties providing his EU settlement scheme details for universal credit due to the pandemic.
- The Bill aims to end free movement of persons in UK law.
- The Government will invest £1.5 billion more funding in adult and children’s social care.
- Winterton opposes Lords amendment 1, which requires an independent assessment of the impact of ending free movement on the social care sector within six months.
- She also opposes Lords amendment 2, which would provide preferential family reunion rights under EU free movement law indefinitely.
- The government has not responded to the recommendation from the Migration Advisory Committee regarding adding social care to the shortage occupation list.
- There are fewer than 4,000 children in care who may be affected, with only 40% having applied for necessary entitlements.
- Safe Passage warns that 95% of child refugees they have supported through Dublin route would unlikely qualify under new proposed system.
- The UK is the only country in Europe that locks people up indefinitely for immigration purposes.
- £7 million was paid out last year in compensation for wrongful detention cases involving 272 individuals.
- At the end of June, there were 40 people who had been detained for over a year and four for more than two years.
- The Home Office estimated 9,000 EU children in care but recent surveys suggest under 4,000 after local authority assessments.
- The amendment received strong support in the Lords with 317 votes to 223.
- Since 2016, an average of over 500 children per year have been rescued under Dublin III provisions compared to just 11 before its implementation.
- There are currently over 1,600 unaccompanied children on Greek islands, many with chronic illnesses and exposed to exploitation.
- More than 30 local authorities have identified 1,400 places if the government will support these children.
- The Government have engaged financial privilege on amendment 5.
- Amendment 9 seeks to change the terms available to trafficked persons from EEA territories arriving after 31 December.
- Only 8% to 9% of applications for discretionary leave to remain are granted by the Home Office.
- One in five health and social care workers was born outside the UK.
- The Bill introduces a points-based system allowing entry for those earning over £25,600 annually.
- Care workers are described as underpaid despite their essential role during the pandemic.
- The Government argues that digital status cannot be lost or tampered with.
- 22% of people lack essential digital skills in the UK.
- A Residential Landlords Association survey found 20% of landlords are less likely to consider renting to EU nationals due to complications.
- The amendment aims to provide a safety net for children who have missed necessary paperwork deadlines.
- Only 40% of identified looked-after children and care leavers have had applications made on their behalf since the launch of the EU settlement scheme.
- Late application cases will be considered on individual merits with a pragmatic approach by the Home Office.
- Only 5% of social care workers come from EU migration.
- Unemployment is at 10.5% in the MP's constituency.
- The Government has invested £1.5 billion in adult and children’s social care.
- There will be a national recruitment campaign for the social care sector.
- 20,000 people working in the Lake District hospitality industry are from outside the UK.
- The speaker's grandparents were refugees who settled in the UK without EU membership.
- Lords amendment 2 seeks to ensure that UK nationals in the EEA or Switzerland have lifetime rights to bring close family members on EU free movement terms.
- The government aims for an immigration system treating all people fairly based on merit and need.
- The income threshold would exclude 69% of EU nationals currently in the UK.
- There will be a shortage of 122,000 social care workers by 2030.
- Nearly 70% of those detained are eventually released and allowed to stay in the UK.
- Countries like Germany, France, Spain, and Greece see two to four times as many asylum applications compared to the UK.
- The Bill aims to end free movement and establish a new points-based immigration system.
- Lords amendment 2 would allow EU citizens to bypass normal immigration rules for family reunion rights indefinitely, which Winterton opposes as unfair.
- Care workers earn an average salary of £19,104, below the proposed £26,500 threshold and not included in shortage occupation lists.
- Bailey represents Sandwell, where 16,000 people work in social care.
- His constituency voted 70% to leave the EU.
- The government promised £1.5 million for social care improvements.
- The Bill addresses the management and administration of processes rather than operational law.
- Undocumented children in care systems are at risk of future Windrush situations due to retroactive application requirements.
- Local authorities with care responsibilities or family members with special guardianship orders may face difficulties obtaining necessary documentation for young persons' nationality.
- The cost burden for local authorities applying for settled status should be either waived or substantially reduced by the Home Office.
- Refugees and individuals facing digital exclusion need reliable access to documentary evidence of their granted status.
- Changes to guidance on modern slavery will be in place from 1 January.
- Discussions are ongoing with the European Union regarding bilateral arrangements for migration rules.
- The government is moving towards digital status documentation, similar to systems used by countries like Australia.
- The House disagreed with Lords amendments 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
- Lords amendment 2 was also disagreed to.
- The Committee agreed to a Committee being appointed to draw up reasons for disagreeing with the Lords amendments.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy