<-- Back to proposed bills

Agriculture Bill

12 October 2020

Proposing MP
Ribble Valley
Type
Bill Debate

At a Glance

Issue Summary

Nigel Evans addresses financial privilege concerns related to Lords amendments in the Agriculture Bill. Victoria Prentis discusses food security measures in response to the pandemic and addresses amendments related to reporting frequency and pesticide use. The statement discusses concerns regarding the impact of future trade deals on farmers and food standards in the UK. Victoria Prentis discusses the scrutiny process for future trade agreements and the role of the Trade and Agriculture Commission in ensuring high standards are maintained. Victoria Prentis discusses concerns about proposed amendments to the Agriculture Bill that could impose new conditions on trade agreements and jeopardize existing deals. The MP discusses Lords amendments related to food security reporting and legislative consent for devolved administrations, supporting British farmers and high food standards. The statement discusses concerns about the impact of post-Brexit trade deals on British farmers' livelihoods and food standards. The MP discusses concerns regarding the UK's trade deals with developing countries and the need for higher agricultural standards post-Brexit. The MP is discussing the Agriculture Bill and its impact on food standards and environmental practices. The speaker discusses the need for proper scrutiny of future trade deals to protect animal welfare and environmental standards. The MP discusses concerns about the Agriculture Bill and its impact on food standards in Scotland. The statement discusses support for amendments in the Agriculture Bill related to food import standards and the role of the Trade and Agriculture Commission. The statement discusses opposition to certain amendments in the Agriculture Bill that aim to maintain high food safety and environmental standards during international trade negotiations. Tim Farron discusses the importance of maintaining high standards for public goods and animal welfare in UK agriculture while transitioning to the environmental land management scheme (ELMS). George Freeman discusses the Agriculture Bill, emphasizing its importance for British farming policy post-Brexit and the need to uphold high standards in food production and animal welfare. The speaker discusses concerns about protecting British farming standards from being undermined by future trade agreements and urges the Government to legislate to ensure food imports meet British standards. The MP discusses the Agriculture Bill and opposes certain amendments from the House of Lords regarding food standards and trade relationships. MP Nigel Evans is discussing the Agriculture Bill and its implications for British farming standards. The statement discusses opposition to the Agriculture Bill due to concerns over food safety, environmental impact, and animal welfare. Bill Wiggin discusses the impact of proposed agricultural amendments on trade, food standards, and consumer trust. The speaker discusses concerns about the importation of chlorinated chicken and hormone-injected beef, emphasizing that any changes to sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) standards would require parliamentary approval. The MP is discussing the Agriculture Bill and its implications for food and animal welfare standards post-Brexit. The MP discusses supporting British farmers through the Agriculture Bill and maintaining high food standards post-Brexit. The speaker discusses concerns about Lords Amendment 16 to the Agriculture Bill and its potential impact on Scottish farmers' ability to compete in international trade. The statement discusses the Agriculture Bill and its implications for food and animal welfare standards in the UK post-Brexit. Nicholas Fletcher discusses Lords amendment 17 which proposes setting a net zero target for farmers by 2030. Victoria Prentis addresses concerns about farming standards and trade in the context of the Agriculture Bill. The statement addresses the disagreement with Lords amendment 18, which would establish a Trade and Agriculture Commission.

Action Requested

The House is informed that amendment 18 is deemed disagreed due to financial implications not authorised by the money resolution. No further action is proposed beyond this ruling and explanation.

Key Facts

  • Financial privilege is engaged by Lords amendments 3, 4, 18, and 30.
  • Amendment 18 would establish a Trade and Agriculture Commission but was deemed disagreed due to financial implications not authorised.
  • Standing Order No. 78 paragraph 3 mandates the disagreement ruling.
  • The government allocated £63 million to local authorities for direct support to people in need.
  • A further £16 million was given to frontline charities aiding food distribution.
  • The frequency of food security reporting will be reduced from five years to three years through Lords amendments 5 to 8.
  • The Minister is cautious about the drafting of Lords amendment 11, which aims to protect human health by regulating pesticide use.
  • The Minister reiterates the Government's commitment to high environmental protection, animal welfare, and food standards in trade negotiations.
  • Existing import standards are enshrined in legislation such as the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020.
  • Independent food regulators, including the Food Standards Agency and Food Standards Scotland, ensure that all food imports meet UK product rules and regulations.
  • Lords amendment 16 includes conditions for continuity and new agreements.
  • The Government will uphold high standards in future trade deals, particularly focusing on animal welfare.
  • There is a full scrutiny process with parliamentary committees reviewing agreements before they are laid in Parliament under the CRaG procedure for 21 sitting days.
  • The International Trade Committee receives copies of deals and provides reports.
  • Impact assessments covering economic, social, environmental, and animal welfare aspects are shared confidentially with at least 10 sitting days' notice.
  • DEFRA runs supply chain advisory groups like the arable group, livestock group, and food and drink panel.
  • The Trade and Agriculture Commission has met six times and established three working groups covering consumers, competitiveness, and standards.
  • The amendments could jeopardise 19 currently unsigned agreements worth millions in trade.
  • Whisky exports to Canada are worth £96 million, potato exports to Egypt are worth £30 million, and milk powder exports to Algeria are worth £21 million.
  • Agriculture produces about 10% of emissions.
  • Amendment 2 requires publication of multi-annual financial assistance plans at least 12 months before implementation.
  • First report on food security will be published by Christmas next year, 2021.
  • Devolved Administrations have given legislative consent to the Bill.
  • Labour supports legal guarantees for high UK food and farming standards in the Agriculture Bill.
  • The amendment to strengthen the Trade and Agriculture Commission is expected to be redrafted in the Lords.
  • Luke Pollard advocates for a legal lock on food standards post-Brexit.
  • Farmers' votes are not guaranteed and need to be won through strong support and delivery.
  • The Government has nine trade deals with sub-Saharan African countries that need to be renewed by December 31st.
  • Lower tariffs for developing countries are set through the generalised scheme of preferences in exchange for protection of human rights, labour rights and the environment.
  • The amendment seeks to address animal welfare and environmental protections beyond EU import restrictions.
  • The Labour Party has voted against the Bill at every opportunity to protect farmers from being undercut by lower standard imports.
  • There is cross-party concern about food standards but agreement on changing farm support methods in the Bill.
  • The UK's food processing industry is worth £120 billion and 60% of processed food is produced under high standards.
  • Brazil has burned down 2.5 million acres of rainforest this year.
  • The Trade Bill is not seen as an appropriate place for amending trade-related issues related to agriculture.
  • The speaker believes in the importance of animal welfare and environmental protection in trade deals.
  • The Government has struck down several amendments related to food standards, organics, pesticides, and a national food strategy.
  • Amendments 10 to 15 and 20 to 29 mean the UK Government will have to gain consent of devolved authorities in further areas such as organics.
  • A letter signed by dozens of organizations was sent to Scottish MPs pleading for higher food standards.
  • The government has responded positively to Lords amendment 275 with a public consultation in autumn.
  • Amendment 16 aims for concrete legal protections for food import standards similar to the Commons amendment tabled by the EFRA Committee.
  • The MP believes that fair terms of trade for high standards in British agriculture cannot be separated from farming and environment legislation.
  • The statement criticizes the CAP for impeding productivity and stifling innovation.
  • Amendment 16 obligates that any agri-environmental food import must be produced under standards equivalent to or exceeding those in the UK.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality of enforcing such stringent environmental standards on developing countries.
  • The Environmental Land Management Scheme (ELMS) will not be available to all UK farmers until 2028.
  • 85% of livestock farmer profitability is based on BPS payments.
  • Amendment 16 supports British values in animal welfare, parliamentary scrutiny and environmental standards.
  • George Freeman is an MP from a very agricultural constituency.
  • The Agriculture Bill aims to take control of farming policy back from the EU after 40 years.
  • Lord Curry tabled an amendment in the House of Lords for a Trade and Agriculture Commission (TAC).
  • The WTO prohibits using animal welfare and food production standards as legal bases for trade restrictions.
  • The amendments are supported by peers, farmers, consumer groups, and the majority of the British public.
  • Legislating for high food standards would benefit UK citizens' health and environment.
  • The Future British Standards Coalition advises on maintaining global trade and environmental benefits.
  • The EU does not require its trade partners to adopt all its environmental and food standards.
  • The UK already bans chicken washed in chlorinated water and growth hormones in beef.
  • Developing countries might lack the necessary bureaucratic infrastructure to meet UK reporting requirements.
  • Evans has lived with agriculture issues for 67 years.
  • The Bill aims to continue raising British farming standards through purchasing public goods.
  • Variable tariffs are proposed to make clear to trading partners that non-adherence to high standards will lead to raised tariffs on their goods.
  • Scottish Tory voters backed calls for food standards maintenance by 95% according to Which?.
  • The Agriculture Bill faces criticism for its perceived opposition to constituents' ambitions for food safety, environmental protection, and animal welfare.
  • Trade deals with the US are seen as prioritizing economic interests over maintaining high food standards.
  • The UK imports more than £47 billion-worth of food.
  • The amendments could restrict trade with countries like Denmark regarding their farming practices.
  • British pig industry was decimated after banning sow stalls and tethers, while Europe did not ban them.
  • The speaker thanks the Minister for providing information to Members about the Bill.
  • There has been fear-mongering regarding chlorinated chicken and hormone-injected beef imports, which the MP states would not occur without parliamentary approval.
  • The MP requests a commitment on labelling from the Government.
  • One third of land in Sheffield Hallam is agricultural.
  • Ministers claim that trading standards will be world-leading after Brexit.
  • Without amendments, British farmers are concerned about being undercut on food and animal welfare standards.
  • The EU’s import restrictions apply to products that breach UK food safety standards but not those related to animal welfare and environmental protection.
  • The previous common agricultural policy is seen as a failure.
  • British farmers have some of the highest food standards in the world.
  • An independent Trade and Agriculture Commission has been established.
  • The amendment would require imported food to be equivalent to or exceed domestic standards.
  • Current imports do not meet UK domestic production standards under EU rules.
  • Over 1 million people have signed a petition calling for food standards to be enshrined in law.
  • Conservative manifesto promised not to compromise on food standards in trade negotiations.
  • Current legal protections for animal welfare and food safety have been carried over from EU law but can be overturned in secondary legislation without adequate scrutiny.
  • The US and Australia are pushing the UK to accept lower-standard foods such as chlorinated chicken and hormone-injected beef.
  • Over 1 million people signed a National Farmers Union petition calling on the Government to uphold high standards.
  • The amendment demands regulations be introduced within a short 12-month timeframe.
  • Agriculture is responsible for only 9% of the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions.
  • The National Farmers Union has its own 2040 net-zero target.
  • Victoria Prentis reassures that chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-treated beef will not be imported into Britain under any circumstances.
  • The Trade and Agriculture Commission is mentioned as a helpful tool for feeding into current trade negotiations but does not need to be enshrined in law.
  • Amendment 16, which imposes conditions on new Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), was disagreed with by the House.
  • Mr Speaker deemed Lords amendment 18 disagreed to.
  • Amendments 2-8, 10, 13-15, and 19-46 are agreed to.
  • Commons financial privileges waived in respect of Lords amendments 3, 4, and 30.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy