<-- Back to proposed bills
Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill [Lords]
06 October 2020
Type
Bill Debate
At a Glance
Issue Summary
Eleanor Laing explains the procedure for conducting the Committee stage of the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill. Eleanor Laing discusses amendments and new clauses related to the implementation of international agreements, particularly focusing on the 2007 Lugano Convention. Eleanor Laing is discussing Schedule 3H of the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill as it relates to the implementation of certain agreements. Eleanor Laing is discussing the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill [Lords] which relates to implementing international agreements, including the Lugano Convention. The statement discusses the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill and concerns over parliamentary scrutiny of treaty accession and order-making powers. Eleanor Laing is supporting amendments related to the scrutiny of international treaties and the importance of joining the Lugano convention. The statement discusses the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill, focusing on the need for speed and flexibility in implementing treaties like the Singapore Mediation Convention. The statement discusses the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill, focusing on its importance for UK businesses and families dealing with cross-border disputes post-Brexit transition period. The statement discusses the importance of Private International Law (PIL) agreements for international trade and dispute resolution. The statement addresses concerns about the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill and its impact on parliamentary scrutiny and constituents' priorities. Eleanor Laing supports new clause 5 of the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill, which proposes using delegated legislation to implement future international private law agreements. The statement discusses amendments aimed at enhancing transnational cooperation through the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill. The statement discusses concerns about new clause 5 of the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill, which aims to implement the Lugano convention but grants sweeping powers to the Executive. Alex Chalk addresses the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill, emphasizing its importance for cross-border civil and family justice matters. The statement discusses the parliamentary scrutiny of Private International Law (PIL) agreements and the proposed changes to bring more transparency and oversight into effect. The statement discusses the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill, focusing on the implementation of the Lugano convention and other international agreements. The debate discusses the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill and the scrutiny process for PIL treaties. Eleanor Laing is addressing the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill [Lords], specifically discussing a new clause that provides power for implementing international agreements related to private international law. Eleanor Laing is discussing restrictions on the power to make regulations under the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill. Eleanor Laing is moving the Third Reading of the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill, highlighting its importance for UK businesses, families, and individuals. The statement discusses the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill, highlighting its importance in ensuring proper scrutiny and implementation of international legal agreements post-Brexit. The statement discusses the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill, which aims to implement agreements related to private international law and has important consequences for businesses and individuals.
Action Requested
Jonathan Djanogly moves an amendment to include the force of law for the 2007 Lugano Convention in the United Kingdom, with specific provisions for reservations or declarations made by the UK at the time of approval and a reference to Schedule 3H containing the English text of the Convention.
Key Facts
- The Chair of the Committee will remain in the Speaker’s Chair due to social distancing requirements.
- Jonathan Djanogly moves amendment 2, page 2, line 20, at end insert for the 2007 Lugano Convention.
- Amendment includes provisions for reservations or declarations made by the UK when approving the Convention.
- Amendments aim to insert new subsections allowing Her Majesty by Order in Council to extend NC5 (including NS4) to the Isle of Man.
- New clause 5 provides powers for implementing international agreements relating to private international law, with modifications for model laws adopted by international organisations.
- Amendment (g) specifies that 'relevant international agreement' refers to the 2007 Lugano Convention.
- Schedule 3H of the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill.
- No specific dates or timelines are mentioned.
- The statement relates to amendments NC1, NC2, NS1, NS2, and NS3 which propose changes to the bill's title and provisions.
- The super-affirmative resolution procedure would apply to regulations implementing the Lugano Convention of 2007 and other private international agreements.
- Regulations must not create new criminal offences punishable by more than two years' imprisonment or delegate legislative powers.
- The Bill concerns parliamentary scrutiny of treaty accession and orders made pursuant to treaties.
- The Government tabled their amendments only late last week.
- New clauses and amendments have been proposed by the MP.
- Three Lords Committee reports over the past two years described CRaG as outdated, inadequate, and flawed.
- Australia's system for treaty scrutiny involves laying treaties before Parliament for at least 15 joint sitting days.
- Amendments propose a sunset provision of two years for order-making powers.
- The Justice Committee was not mentioned during Second Reading.
- The current Ponsonby convention is inadequate for modern times.
- Joining the Lugano convention is urgent to avoid a gap in civil justice co-operation.
- Contracts under Brussels I, Brussels II, and Rome conventions will lose EU membership benefits post-transition period.
- The Italian torpedo refers to conflicting cases run in different jurisdictions simultaneously.
- The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators is mentioned as an associated organisation.
- The Singapore mediation convention is highlighted as a treaty needing prompt implementation.
- The UK is described as falling behind in maintaining its position as a global hub for alternative dispute resolution compared to countries like Singapore.
- The UK regained full competence to enter into PIL agreements from February 1, 2021.
- The Bill supports the implementation of key international treaties such as the 1996 and 2005 Hague conventions on child abduction and maintenance enforcement.
- Delegated legislation is constitutionally appropriate for implementing these agreements.
- The UK led the world towards free trade starting from the Reciprocity of Duties Act in 1823 and further with the repeal of corn laws in 1846.
- Private International Law agreements are crucial for legal certainty, conflict jurisdiction resolution, and international judgment enforcement.
- The transition period post-EU membership necessitates urgent PIL agreements to support global Britain's pivot.
- New clause 5 would allow Ministers to implement treaties through an affirmative statutory instrument process.
- The CRaG mechanism exists for scrutiny of statutory instruments.
- Bishop Auckland constituents prioritize healthcare, education, crime, and immigration over PIL treaties.
- New clause 5 seeks to use delegated legislation for future international private law agreements.
- Parliamentary scrutiny will exist through the affirmative process under new clause 5.
- The Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1933 and Maintenance Orders (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1972 contain delegated powers allowing decisions to be made by Order in Council.
- Amendments aim to enhance transnational cooperation.
- The Lugano convention is significant in avoiding multiple court cases and saving costs.
- A simple mechanism needs to be introduced by December 31 if the UK joins the Lugano convention.
- New clause 5 aims to implement the Lugano convention swiftly.
- Amendment (a) would allow implementation without granting sweeping Henry VIII powers.
- Amendment (e) proposes a super-affirmative resolution procedure for implementing international agreements via secondary legislation.
- Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill addresses cross-border civil and family justice matters.
- The bill aims to implement PIL agreements in a timely and effective manner, ensuring 'agility' in negotiation contexts.
- Previous agreements like the Lugano convention and Hague conventions were non-contentious and widely accepted.
- The statement critiques the lack of parliamentary role when the UK was part of the European Union for PIL agreements.
- It mentions the CRaG procedure and affirmative procedure as methods to introduce more scrutiny.
- Orders in Council were used previously, bypassing normal parliamentary processes.
- Amendments 1 to 4, new clauses 1 and 2, and new schedule 3 are discussed in relation to Lugano convention implementation.
- Additional provisions will be required for the proper implementation of Lugano into domestic law.
- The Bill complies with the devolution settlement, as legislative consent motions have been passed by Scottish Parliament and Northern Ireland Assembly.
- The debate highlights the importance of proper scrutiny provisions and expertise in determining ministerial orders.
- Points were made about the need for agility, flexibility, and speed in approaching these orders by several MPs.
- Japan, the US, and EU have more stringent scrutiny processes compared to the UK.
- The new clause provides power to implement international agreements relating to private international law.
- The clause was read a Second time and added to the Bill after debate in the Committee.
- Schedules 1 to 5 were agreed to.
- Regulations under section 3 may not include provisions that confer legislative power or create serious criminal offences.
- The power to make regulations can be exercised by statutory instrument for England/Wales and statutory rule for Northern Ireland.
- Drafts of certain types of regulations must be approved by Parliament or the relevant assembly before implementation.
- The Bill aims to underpin future benefits for the United Kingdom and its citizens.
- It seeks to replace and update the UK’s private international law framework post-Brexit.
- All parties agree on the importance of remaining at the forefront of delivering justice internationally.
- The Bill aims to provide a sound footing for private international law agreements post-EU.
- Concerns raised about criminal sanctions and CRaG operation need addressing.
- Declarations attached to international legal agreements may have significant impacts and require proper scrutiny.
- Examples include excluding insurance contracts from the Hague choice of court convention 2005.
- Model laws, while not treaties, are important soft law provisions needing scrutiny before domestic implementation.
- Implementation of key Hague conventions is recommended for civil and family law cooperation.
- Ratification of the 2000 Hague convention on international protection of adults in England and Wales is suggested.
- The Bill aims to implement agreements related to private international law.
- It has important consequences for businesses and individuals.
- The Minister worked across the Chamber and respected the devolution settlement during the process.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy