<-- Back to proposed bills
United Kingdom Internal Market Bill
14 September 2020
Type
Bill Debate
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The Prime Minister is discussing the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill aimed at preserving free trade within the UK post-Brexit. The statement discusses the UK's response to potential EU threats under the Northern Ireland protocol, particularly regarding tariffs and border controls within the United Kingdom. The Prime Minister is defending the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its provisions for maintaining territorial integrity and supporting Northern Ireland’s place in the UK's customs territory. The statement discusses opposition to the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, arguing it undermines international law and the devolution settlements. Ed Miliband critiques the UK Government's actions regarding the Northern Ireland protocol and the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, arguing that they undermine international law and the Good Friday agreement. The debate focuses on the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its implications for the Northern Ireland protocol. The statement criticizes the UK Government's proposed United Kingdom Internal Market Bill for breaching international law and undermining trust in negotiations. The debate focuses on the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, which aims to guarantee national sovereignty but is criticized for potentially violating international and domestic laws, undermining devolution, and breaching treaty obligations. The statement discusses the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its potential impact on devolved powers in Scotland, particularly regarding standards for animal welfare, food safety, and environmental protection. Ian Blackford criticizes the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill for centralizing powers and undermining Scottish Parliament's authority. Ian Blackford discusses the impact of the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill on devolution in Scotland, highlighting concerns from various stakeholders. Bob Neill raises concerns about Part 5 of the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, particularly clauses 42, 43, and 45, which he believes may lead to a breach of international obligations. The statement discusses concerns about the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its potential impact on trade within the UK and internationally. The MP discusses the lack of funding from the UK government for flood recovery and infrastructure improvements in his constituency and criticizes the government's response. The debate focuses on concerns about the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, particularly its implications for international law and the UK's reputation. The statement discusses the UK Internal Market Bill, addressing its necessity due to the EU's perceived lack of cooperation in trade negotiations. The MP is discussing concerns about the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, particularly regarding its potential breach of international law and undermining of devolution settlements. The debate discusses the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill's impact on Northern Ireland, particularly regarding trade and economic implications. MPs debate the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its implications for Northern Ireland protocol and international law. MPs are discussing the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its implications for international law and devolution. The statement addresses the UK Internal Market Bill and its potential impact on international law. The statement addresses concerns about the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its potential impact on international relations and trade negotiations. Jeremy Wright discusses his concerns about certain clauses in the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill that he believes could breach international law. Pete Wishart criticizes the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill as pernicious and chaotic legislation. The statement discusses the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, emphasizing its importance for jobs and businesses in Scotland. The debate focuses on the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, which aims to provide clarity and certainty in the event that a free trade agreement with the EU cannot be reached by the end of the transition period. MP Chris Bryant criticizes the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill for undermining international law and the rule of honour. The statement discusses the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its implications for the rule of law, devolution, and the integrity of the Union. The statement discusses the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, focusing on Clause 47 which ensures UK sovereignty over state aid rules for Northern Ireland and its importance in maintaining peace and prosperity. The speaker discusses the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, arguing it is within legal rights to defend the Union and Northern Ireland's businesses from perceived bullying or unreasonable demands from the EU. The speaker discusses concerns over restrictions on liberties and enforcement measures during the pandemic, criticising the government's approach as un-conservative and urging for a more balanced and democratic handling of the situation. The debate is about the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, which aims to provide a safety net for UK trade policy in case of delays or failures in EU negotiations. The statement discusses opposition to the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its potential negative impacts on legal integrity, international relations, economic stability, and the Union. The statement discusses concerns about the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its potential impact on devolution and international relations. The debate focuses on the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its implications for Northern Ireland, particularly regarding the protocol designed to avoid a hard border. The statement discusses opposition to the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, arguing it undermines devolution and international law. The statement addresses the necessity of the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill to secure free trade and prosperity within the UK, despite criticisms regarding its legality. The statement discusses the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, addressing its necessity and implications for Northern Ireland's status within the UK and the potential impact on devolved powers in Wales. The statement discusses concerns about the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its implications for Brexit negotiations and internal market regulations. MPs are discussing the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, which aims to protect the integrity of the Union and ensure Northern Ireland remains part of it. The debate centers on the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, with MPs discussing its legality and impact on the union. MPs are debating the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill, expressing concerns over its impact on international law, the UK's reputation, and devolution. The statement discusses the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its potential breach of international law under the Northern Ireland Protocol. The statement addresses the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill and its importance in maintaining the integrity of the UK's internal market during the post-Brexit period. Michael Gove defends the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill against criticisms from pro-devolution members.
Action Requested
The Prime Minister proposes the passage of the Bill to ensure unfettered access for businesses between Northern Ireland and Great Britain, maintaining the integrity of the internal market as promised in the government's manifesto. The Bill aims to protect jobs and livelihoods by providing legal certainty during the transition period following Brexit.
Key Facts
- The United Kingdom Internal Market Bill seeks to preserve free trade across the UK.
- The Bill is designed to honour the pledge for unfettered access from Northern Ireland to Great Britain and vice versa as promised in the government's manifesto.
- The EU's proposed actions could lead to prohibitions on transferring animal products from Great Britain to Northern Ireland under the Northern Ireland protocol.
- The EU is threatening to impose tariffs up to 90% on Scottish beef, over 61% on Welsh lamb, and over 100% on clotted cream moving within the UK.
- The Bill includes powers for Ministers to guarantee the integrity of the United Kingdom if necessary.
- These reserve powers are described as an insurance policy against unreasonable EU actions under the Northern Ireland protocol.
- The Bill includes reserve powers in case of material breach by the EU as per international law.
- The Bill covers 160 different policy areas, transferring power to devolved Administrations.
- A new Office for the Internal Market will oversee UK’s internal market.
- Ed Miliband calls on the Government to negotiate a trade deal with the EU.
- The amendment declines to give a Second Reading to the Internal Market Bill because it undermines the Withdrawal Agreement and international law.
- Common frameworks have been developed since 2017, which could be legislated for during the Bill's passage.
- The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee report criticizes the UK's approach to Brexit negotiations.
- Five former Prime Ministers have united against the current PM's handling of international law and reputation.
- Article 16 of the protocol allows unilateral measures if serious difficulties arise, but Miliband argues that this does not justify breaching international agreements.
- The protocol was a threat to the Good Friday agreement.
- The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster warned about the protocol issues in March.
- The Joint Committee on the Northern Ireland protocol is designed for resolving issues with the protocol.
- The statement criticizes breaking international law specifically and in a limited way as proposed by the Government.
- Businesses are deeply worried about the danger of no deal during the current economic crisis.
- Nancy Pelosi stated that violating the Northern Ireland Protocol would make a US-UK trade agreement impossible to pass through Congress.
- Section 38 of the 2020 Act was passed without objections from either House.
- The Bill is described as an insurance policy and guarantee of national sovereignty under the Vienna convention.
- The Law Society of Scotland comments that breaking international law could have far-reaching consequences.
- The UK Internal Market Bill has been criticized for potentially breaching international law.
- The Bill contains provisions (Clauses 2 to 9) that could compel Scotland to accept lower standards set elsewhere in the UK.
- Policies such as minimum alcohol pricing and smoking bans introduced by devolved governments may be undermined under this legislation.
- The Bill establishes an unelected monitoring body called the Office for the Internal Market.
- Clause 48 reserves state aid powers, mirroring those of the World Trade Organisation.
- The Business Secretary will have power to change exemptions from the Bill at any time.
- Professor Nicola McEwen found that the internal market Bill limits policy divergences.
- The Scottish Trades Union Congress stated that the Prime Minister's actions roll back devolution settlement.
- Welsh Labour Government advised against sacrificing the future of the union by stealing powers from devolved administrations.
- Part 5 of the Bill creates difficulty due to its potential breach of international obligations.
- Clauses 42, 43, and 45 give Ministers wide-ranging powers to disapply elements of the withdrawal agreement and protocol by regulation.
- Article 168 binds the UK to resolve disputes only through arbitration processes set out in the withdrawal agreement.
- The UK Internal Market Bill is debated in Parliament.
- Clause 46 enhances powers of UK Ministers to act in UK nations.
- Businesses and consumers' interests must be protected across all parts of the country.
- The UK Government has provided no funding for flooding problems in Rhondda this year.
- Material falling into rivers from tips is a responsibility of the UK Government and requires funding by them.
- Devolved policy areas give Wales £120 for every £100 spent in England.
- The debate centres on the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill.
- The Prime Minister is accused of playing politics with British jobs and business.
- Speaker Nancy Pelosi has stated that Congress would not pass any trade agreement undermining the Good Friday Agreement.
- EU rules on state aid would allow imposition of its regime on UK domestic policy.
- Clause 46 undermines the devolution settlement by stripping spending powers from the Scottish Parliament.
- Over a 10-year period, the Scottish block grant has been cut by the Conservative Government.
- The Bill allows Ministers to break international law without legal challenge.
- The Bill undermines devolved nations' ability to set quality standards and consumer protection levels for imported goods.
- The shared prosperity fund's allocation is exclusively decided by the UK Parliament and Government.
- Article sixth of the Act of Union 1800 states that subjects of Ireland should have the same privileges as British subjects.
- Article 184 of the 2019 withdrawal agreement requires both sides to operate in good faith and respect their legal orders.
- Clause 38 of the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 asserts that the Parliament of the United Kingdom is sovereign.
- The Prime Minister warned about interpreting the agreement in a way that excludes Northern Ireland from accessing goods from the rest of the United Kingdom.
- The Government plans to arm itself with powers to prevent breaking up the economic integrity of the UK, which is considered an extreme circumstance.
- The Bill gives Ministers powers to disapply or reinterpret parts of the Northern Ireland protocol and ignore legal obligations in domestic and international law.
- The EU is threatening legal action through the European Court if the UK breaches the withdrawal agreement.
- The Government faces criticism for attempting to unilaterally change terms agreed in January, despite previously describing them as 'oven-ready'.
- There are concerns about the impact on Northern Ireland's protocol and the devolution settlement.
- The speaker supports Brexit but is concerned about breaking international law.
- The Northern Ireland protocol was agreed upon with an assumption of no additional trade barriers.
- The EU's refusal to provide a standard trade deal has created constitutional implications for the UK.
- Some legal experts conclude that the Bill would protect against abuse if the EU breaches its obligations.
- The Prime Minister's position is seen as a distraction from other pressing issues.
- Senior Conservative MPs express grave concerns about breaking international law through the Bill.
- The bill undermines UK's moral authority and reputation globally.
- The Government's proposal is seen as a reversal of the primacy of the withdrawal agreement over domestic law.
- Jeremy Wright highlights that breaching international law could undermine Britain's authority on the world stage and its reputation for respecting the rule of law.
- The Bill includes clauses 42, 43, and 45 which are under scrutiny.
- Pete Wishart criticizes clause 46 of the Bill for allowing direct legislation in devolved areas.
- The Bill is seen as a means to circumvent Scottish democracy by granting direct control over specific interests.
- Independence support in Scotland stands at 55%, the highest ever recorded.
- The Fraser of Allander Institute estimates that 545,000 jobs rely on the internal market of the United Kingdom.
- In 2018, £51.5 billion of trade occurred between Scotland and the rest of the UK—three times more than Scotland's trade with the whole European Union.
- More than 100 extra powers are being transferred to the Scottish Parliament.
- The Joint Committee was designed to provide definitions around 'goods at risk' and details of the Northern Irish protocol.
- The EU is accused of not acting in good faith during negotiations.
- Clause 46 assumes budgets in Scotland without consent.
- Part 1 undermines the competence of Scottish authorities to make different decisions.
- The Bill includes a clause using 'notwithstanding' which allows breaking international or domestic laws in specific ways.
- Chris Bryant argues the bill is damaging to Britain’s honour and integrity as it breaches international agreements.
- Andrew Mitchell highlights the importance of upholding international law for supporting human rights globally.
- The Bill is seen as breaking promises made to leave voters by the Prime Minister.
- Michael Howard, an arch Brexiteer, questioned the message this sends to other nations regarding upholding international law.
- The Bill threatens to weaken 'global Britain's ability to exercise influence in the world'.
- 500,000 jobs in Scotland are mentioned as being protected by the Bill.
- Clause 47 ensures UK sovereignty over state aid rules for Northern Ireland.
- The Bill aims to prevent EU threats on food supply in case of a no-deal scenario.
- 65% of goods purchased by Northern Ireland come from Great Britain.
- The provisions of the Bill are allowed under paragraph 1 of article 16 in the Northern Ireland protocol.
- Section 38 of the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 supports the Bill's measures.
- The Scottish Parliament's powers could be undermined by the Bill if it becomes a protected enactment under the Scotland Act 1998.
- Speaker expresses concern over severe restrictions placed without parliamentary debate.
- Mentions arrest of individuals in Trafalgar Square for peaceful protest and heavy fines imposed.
- Criticizes government's urging public to inform on friends and neighbours regarding breaches of pandemic rules.
- Maria Miller argues that the Bill is a safety net against EU delays.
- The Prime Minister won an election with an 80-seat majority on the promise of 'getting Brexit done'.
- Wales is now considered the most Unionist part of the UK according to pollsters.
- Illustrative figures show that any contraction to the GDP of Wales will be five times greater than the UK average.
- The Bill is described as the worst legislation brought before the House by the current Government.
- Passing the Bill undermines the withdrawal agreement, breaches international law, and risks damaging peace in Ireland by undermining the Good Friday Agreement.
- The Bill also risks damaging economic relations within the Union and harming living standards through a no-deal Brexit scenario.
- The Bill is seen as a risk to the country’s reputation and ability to negotiate future treaties.
- The Good Friday agreement in Northern Ireland should not be jeopardized by the protocol.
- Businesses across all four nations of the UK support preserving the internal market.
- The majority of people in Northern Ireland voted to remain.
- The protocol is seen as an inevitable consequence of a hard Brexit.
- There are seven air and sea crossings between Great Britain and Northern Ireland versus 270 land crossings on the island of Ireland.
- The Bill is seen as an attack on democracy and devolution.
- The Welsh First Minister, Mark Drakeford, is willing to negotiate in good faith but wants genuine national cooperation.
- Former Conservative leaders have cautioned against law-breaking.
- Parliament is sovereign and supreme in the UK constitution.
- The Northern Ireland protocol acknowledges potential difficulties and allows unilateral safeguard measures under certain conditions.
- Clauses 42, 43, and 45 of the bill will activate only if Joint Committee negotiations on third country listings fail.
- The Bill gives options for protecting internal markets in case no trade deal with the EU is reached.
- It seeks to ensure Northern Ireland's status as an equal partner within the UK, not subject to external pressures.
- The Bill could undermine Welsh devolution by overriding Senedd powers and allowing low-quality produce into Wales.
- The Prime Minister promised to 'get Brexit done' during the 2019 general election campaign.
- The Bill will ensure internal trade remains free across all four nations in the UK post-Brexit.
- Business leaders in Ashfield and Eastwood support the bill for its certainty and protection of jobs.
- The MP has family on both sides of the Northern Ireland border.
- The Bill is described as primarily economic but also deeply constitutional.
- The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee expressed reservations about the Bill's consultation speed and constitutional aspects.
- The UK Internal Market Bill aims to protect the union.
- Some MPs view the bill as a threat to devolution and democratic rights in Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland.
- The European Union is seen by some MPs as acting in bad faith during negotiations.
- The Bill is causing chaos within the governing party.
- It risks damaging the UK's international reputation.
- Several clauses in part 5 cause significant concern among MPs.
- Runnymede and Weybridge is the birthplace of the Magna Carta.
- The UK left the European Union.
- The Bill is claimed by some MPs to break international law, specifically article 5 of the Government’s withdrawal agreement.
- Five living Prime Ministers have warned that this Bill does serious damage to the UK's standing in the world.
- The United Kingdom's internal market is crucial as each part of the UK trades more with each other than anyone else.
- Some 545,000 jobs in Scotland rely on the integrity of the internal market.
- Hundreds of millions of pounds are being invested to help Northern Ireland businesses prepare for new processes under the Northern Ireland protocol.
- The Scottish Government's desire for independence undermines devolution.
- Common frameworks are important but insufficient without legislation underpinning the internal market.
- The EU has not been a constructive partner in negotiations and failed to deliver promised agreements such as a Canada-style deal.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy