<-- Back to proposed bills

Parliamentary Constituencies Bill - Sitting 5

25 June 2020

Proposing MP
North Antrim
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement addresses procedural matters and points of order raised by MPs regarding the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill. Ian Paisley Jnr is addressing the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill and clarifies that Cat Smith can speak to clause 2 during her discussion on amendments. The MP is supporting the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill and arguing against Labour amendments that would undermine fairness in constituency sizes. Chris Matheson discusses his concerns about removing Parliament from the constituency review process under the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill. The statement discusses the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill and the issue of automaticity in boundary reviews. The statement addresses the debate over the reduction of parliamentary constituencies and the potential impact on MPs' seats. The MP discusses concerns about the representation and fairness of constituency boundaries and the role of the unelected House of Lords in amending the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill. John Spellar discusses the debate on the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill and criticizes past decisions that imposed constraints on boundary commissions. The statement discusses issues with constituency boundaries and population changes, highlighting concerns about the creation of 'orphan wards' and a lack of community representation due to rigid mathematical formulas. The MP is discussing the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill and its impact on proper parliamentary scrutiny and community representation. The speaker discusses the importance of balancing flexibility in boundary commission rules while maintaining fairness and representation. The MP is discussing the importance of respecting community boundaries and place when redrawing parliamentary constituencies.

Action Requested

Ian Paisley Jnr, as Chair, notes the points made about seeking clarification on electoral criteria and requests that evidence from the Boundary Commission for England be delivered by 29 June. He also discusses several amendments aimed at maintaining current parliamentary oversight within the boundary review process.

Key Facts

  • The OSCE observation is cited regarding the variation in electorate size between constituencies.
  • The Venice commission's Code of Good Practice states that deviations from distribution criteria should seldom exceed 10%.
  • Evidence from the Boundary Commission for England is due by 29 June.
  • The statement clarifies that Ms Smith can speak to clause 2.
  • No policy changes or legislative proposals are made.
  • The MP supports amendments 2 to 4 and clauses 1 and 2 standing part of the Bill.
  • Some seats require up to 30,000 or 40,000 fewer constituents compared to others like Maria Miller's constituency with 83,000 residents.
  • Professor Hazell and Dr Renwick from UCL testified that parliamentary approval allows for political interference three times.
  • Chris Matheson was elected with a majority of 93.
  • David Linden mentions he was first elected with a majority of 75.
  • Professor Sir John Curtice agreed with the potential political influence on instructions given to the Boundary Commission.
  • The Parliamentary Constituencies Bill is being discussed in Committee.
  • Chris Matheson refers to the reduction of seats from 650 to 600 and the concept of automaticity in boundary reviews.
  • He emphasizes the importance of parliamentary approval as a safety valve to ensure proper implementation of criteria set by MPs.
  • The statement begins by acknowledging the progress in discussing clause 1.
  • No specific policy changes or funding commitments are mentioned.
  • The focus is on procedural advancement of the bill.
  • The current system is seen as flawed by some MPs.
  • Maria Miller and her hon. Friend top with 83,000 constituents in their constituencies.
  • Ben Lake's constituency doubles during summer due to second homers.
  • Alec Shelbrooke's constituency of Leeds Central varies from 78,000 to 94,000 voters due to a transient population.
  • John Spellar refers to the previous Prime Minister's decision to cut the number of politicians as a superficial gimmick.
  • Boundary commissions faced massive opposition from both Conservative Members of Parliament and county associations.
  • The constituencies created in past boundary changes were described as having bizarre shapes.
  • Population changes, growth, and reduction have an impact on constituencies.
  • Former Prime Minister's attempts to reduce the number of constituencies and change the margin of variation created unacceptable frameworks.
  • The borough of Sandwell would likely go down to three seats under proposed changes.
  • The MP references historical boundary changes since 1969.
  • Communities in Halesowen and Selly Oak engaged in hearings and changed commission views.
  • Equality of constituencies is a primary legislative consideration.
  • The speaker acknowledges the self-interest involved in setting constituency boundaries.
  • Historically, Parliament has struggled with equal representation.
  • Experts testified that they do not understand the relationship between MPs and their constituencies.
  • Clive Efford argues against dividing constituencies along arbitrary lines such as High Streets.
  • Constituents value place and community in their representation.
  • MPs are held accountable if they do not defend integral communities.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy