<-- Back to proposed bills
Trade Bill - Sitting 5 (Morning)
23 June 2020
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement addresses amendments to the Trade Bill aimed at enhancing parliamentary scrutiny of international trade agreements. The statement introduces new clauses for parliamentary scrutiny and sustainability impact assessments in free trade agreement negotiations. Judith Cummins is proposing new clauses for transparency in international trade negotiations and reporting on proposed free trade agreements. The statement discusses the importance of proper scrutiny and protection of high standards in trade agreements, particularly focusing on potential issues arising from a UK-US trade deal. The statement addresses concerns about potential public health risks associated with UK-US trade deals, particularly regarding chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-treated beef. The MP is discussing concerns about a potential UK-US trade deal and its implications for public health, food standards, and national services like the NHS. The statement discusses concerns about transparency and scrutiny in UK-US trade negotiations. The MP discusses concerns over potential trade agreements and proposes amendments for increased parliamentary scrutiny. The statement discusses the importance of parliamentary scrutiny in UK's trade negotiations following Brexit. The speaker discusses the importance of proper parliamentary scrutiny for trade agreements, particularly in relation to a potential UK-US deal. The statement discusses the need for increased parliamentary scrutiny over UK trade agreements. The statement addresses the vulnerability of UK automotive manufacturing, particularly Japanese plants, due to uncertainty regarding the UK's future relationship with the EU. The MP is discussing the lack of proper parliamentary scrutiny in the UK's trade agreement negotiations and calling for modernisation of the process. The statement addresses the lack of proper parliamentary scrutiny for international trade agreements in the UK, emphasizing the importance of thorough examination and consultation processes. The MP discusses the adequacy of current parliamentary scrutiny processes for trade agreements and argues for greater involvement in setting negotiating mandates, scrutinising negotiations, approving ratification, and passing implementing legislation. The MP discusses the need for improved scrutiny and democratic oversight in the process of ratifying international trade treaties under the Trade Bill. MP Judith Cummins discusses the Trade Bill and the importance of parliamentary scrutiny in free trade agreement negotiations.
Action Requested
The MP proposes amendments to establish super-affirmative procedures for scrutinizing both free trade and other international trade agreements before ratification and implementation, ensuring thorough parliamentary review and approval processes.
Key Facts
- Amendments aim to apply the provisions of the Bill to non-EU rollover trade agreements.
- The proposed procedure includes laying draft orders or regulations before Parliament with explanations for their necessity.
- Committees of either House have a period of up to 21 sitting days to recommend against an order or regulation being made.
- Sustainability impact assessments must be carried out following consultation.
- Consultations must actively seek views from Scottish Ministers, Welsh Ministers, Northern Ireland devolved authority, businesses, trade unions, and other relevant persons or organisations.
- Public bodies, NGOs, and the public should be made aware of consultations prominently on government websites.
- Sustainability impact assessments must include economic, social, cultural, food security, environmental interests, and human rights impacts.
- Clause 8 requires the publication of agreement texts within ten days after negotiation rounds.
- Clause 19 mandates reports on significant differences in trade-related provisions before UK ratification.
- Clause 20 enforces the laying of detailed comparison reports at least 10 Commons sitting days before regulations implementation.
- The Soil Association has outlined top 10 risks for a potential UK-US trade deal.
- One risk is anti-microbial resistance, with experts warning that up to 10 million people could die annually by 2050 from this issue.
- US farming uses antibiotics five times higher than in the UK on average per annum.
- Chlorine washing of chicken is ineffective at getting rid of infection risks.
- The EU banned steroid hormone drugs for beef production in 1989.
- An EU scientific review concluded that one commonly used hormone is carcinogenic.
- The Soil Association highlighted concerns over nutritional labelling and genetically modified foods.
- Incidents of food poisoning affect 14% of US population annually compared to 1% in UK.
- Concerns exist that a US trade deal could undermine NHS purchasing model for drugs.
- Standstill clauses and ratchet clauses can lock in levels of privatisation and limit future Government scope.
- The TUC is working with American trade unions to inform British workers and Parliament about negotiating texts.
- ISDS clauses allow new investors to sue the Government over measures that harm their profits, potentially creating a regulatory chill.
- Cargill won $77 million from Mexico after introducing a tax to deter high-fructose syrup.
- Amendments 4, 5, 6, 7, and 19 are proposed.
- New clause 5 sets out the process for scrutiny of free trade agreements before signing.
- New clause 6 would require a full sustainability impact assessment.
- The Tradeshow Access Programme has received a 60% cut in financial support over five years.
- £16.2 million was available to help British businesses access new export markets, which reduced to £6.5 million since 2018-19.
- The amendments would require consent of the British people through their representatives in Parliament to agree to any trade treaty.
- 39% of businesses in Putney will be affected by these trade negotiations but may face a lack of scrutiny due to the Bill.
- The Institute of Directors and Confederation of British Industry have expressed concerns about transparency, standards in negotiations, immigration policy, temporary labour mobility, e-commerce, and digital commerce.
- The speaker raises concerns about mode 4 agreements potentially affecting immigration requirements.
- Ministers are criticised for not explaining the potential downsides of trade deals.
- Previous government promises regarding free trade agreements have been inconsistent and unfulfilled.
- Ministers had to be dragged to publish the February 2019 Command Paper on future scrutiny of free trade agreements.
- There has been zero progress on agreeing to give a Committee of the House access to confidential information and briefing from negotiators.
- The UK-Swiss deal has only three mutual recognition chapters compared to the EU-Swiss deal's twenty.
- Out of 11 European products that can be exported at zero or reduced tariffs in the EU agreement with South Korea, the UK secured an agreement for only two.
- Japanese plants are vulnerable due to lack of clarity on UK's future position with the EU.
- A Japanese ambassador’s event two and a half years ago highlighted that Japan would closely monitor UK decisions regarding EU arrangements.
- The Japanese are cautious about entering into any trade deal until there is certainty about the UK's relationship with the EU.
- Sam Lowe from the Centre for European Reform gave UK parliamentary process for trade treaty scrutiny less than five out of ten.
- Trade Justice Movement described the current UK parliamentary process as archaic, dating back to the first world war.
- The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 does not require Parliament’s approval for the Government to ratify treaties.
- The statement criticizes the lack of detailed scrutiny arrangements for UK-Swiss and UK-Norway deals compared to their EU counterparts.
- Only three out of twenty mutual recognition agreement chapters from the Swiss-EU deal are in place in the UK-Swiss deal.
- The South Koreans want to renegotiate after two years, indicating dissatisfaction with current agreements.
- The current scrutiny processes are deemed insufficient by the MP.
- There are at least four possible ways for Parliaments to be involved in treaties as outlined in the Library note.
- Examples include HS2 development, Transport for London's private Bill, and international practices such as those of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.
- CRAG does not require Parliament’s approval for treaty ratification.
- The House of Lords amended the previous Bill to give Parliament a role in setting mandates and approving final trade agreements.
- There is support for debates on objectives, reports on progress, publication of negotiation texts, public consultations, and independent impact assessments.
- Future trade agreements should concern public services, digital services, and health and food standards.
- Professor Winters described UK-Japan talks as “studiously” vague.
- Parliament's engagement can be used as a negotiating tactic, similar to the US Congress.
- The Command Paper commits to working with House Authorities to establish which committee should have access to sensitive information.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy