<-- Back to proposed bills
Parliamentary Constituencies Bill - Sitting 4 (Afternoon)
23 June 2020
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The discussion focuses on the implementation of new parliamentary constituency boundaries following a boundary review. The discussion focuses on the accuracy and completeness of electoral registers, specifically comparing December 2019 and March 2020 registers. Peter Stanyon discusses administrative challenges faced by electoral registration officers (EROs) during boundary reviews and parliamentary elections. Sir David Amess is concluding the session and thanking Andrew Scallan for providing evidence on parliamentary constituency boundaries and local government boundary coordination. The statement discusses the process of local government boundary reviews and the use of polling districts as building blocks for parliamentary constituencies. Sir David Amess chairs a session of the Public Bill Committee discussing the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill. The discussion revolves around international comparisons and the process of redrawing parliamentary boundaries, focusing on the importance of independence and community ties. Darren Hughes discusses the impact of constituency sizes on representation quality in New Zealand and suggests that adopting a single transferable vote system could improve electoral fairness. Darren Hughes discusses the potential for creating representation injuries through rigid constituency boundary rules and suggests allowing commissioners reasonable flexibility to address unique geographic situations. The discussion revolves around the electoral registration process and constituency boundary drawing. Sir David Amess is chairing a session of the Public Bill Committee discussing the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill with Gavin Robinson MP from the Democratic Unionist Party. Sir David Amess acknowledges and thanks Gavin Robinson for his testimony regarding the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill, particularly focusing on the impact and views of Northern Ireland. Dr Jac Larner discusses the implications of the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill for Wales, highlighting potential changes in constituency boundaries and reductions in MP numbers. The discussion focuses on the impact of seat allocation under the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill on Wales and its devolution settlement. Sir David Amess introduces the final session of the day featuring Dr Rossiter and Professor Charles Pattie, who have extensive experience in studying elections and boundary reviews. The statement discusses the impact of demographic changes on constituency sizes and proposes regular reviews every eight years to address these changes. Experts discuss the potential for significant changes and disruptions during the upcoming review of parliamentary constituencies under new rules. The discussion focuses on managing constituency sizes, particularly in highland areas and the concept of splitting communities for electoral equality. The discussion revolves around the balance between electoral equality and minimizing disruption to existing constituency boundaries. Sir David Amess is concluding the session of the Public Bill Committee and thanking witnesses for their evidence.
Action Requested
Peter Stanyon recommends that significant changes from the boundary review should have at least six months to be implemented before an election takes place, ideally with preparations starting in early summer for revisions to the electoral register by December 2023.
Key Facts
- Peter Stanyon is the chief executive of the Association of Electoral Administrators (AEA).
- The next boundary review will finish by July 2023.
- The Gould principle suggests a six-month preparation period before an election takes place for administrators to implement changes effectively.
- A revised version of electoral registers needs to be published by December 1, which is ideal for reflecting new parliamentary constituencies.
- No electoral register is either 100% accurate or complete.
- There may be a discrepancy of hundreds of thousands between December 2019 and March 2020 registers.
- The most accurate version of the register usually appears in the month after an election due to updates made at that time.
- Local authorities must subdivide constituencies into polling districts and designate polling places for stations, with reviews required if boundaries change.
- The Bill allows consideration of ward changes that have not yet come into effect.
- Significant boundary changes from the 2018 review make current administrative practices difficult.
- Communication between different local authorities and their respective EROs is crucial for managing elections.
- Sir David Amess concludes the session.
- Andrew Scallan, deputy chair of the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, provided evidence.
- The committee discussed how to better coordinate parliamentary constituency boundaries and local government boundaries.
- 19 reviews covering 3.3 million people will be made before 1 December.
- Around 13 reviews covering 2.1 million people will not be completed by 1 December.
- Since 2010, there have been three discussions about the commission's orders, but none has been overturned.
- Sir David Amess chairs the Public Bill Committee session.
- Darren Hughes is the chief executive of the Electoral Reform Society.
- The discussion covers comparisons between the UK's boundary review system and that of New Zealand.
- New Zealand's process includes automaticity to avoid political interference.
- Consultation periods should consider innovative methods like citizens' juries.
- The UK system is trusted and has avoided gerrymandering compared to other jurisdictions.
- New Zealand uses proportional representation for local government elections.
- Millions of people either vote for a candidate who does not win or support a winner without needing their votes under the current system.
- The Electoral Reform Society (ERS) tracks movement between nations at UK general elections.
- American congressional districts have close to zero margin of deviation around population size.
- David Daley wrote books about how the boundary system in America got to its current state.
- Professor Iain McLean warned that the concept of local ties can be politicised differently by different political parties.
- The suggestion is to move to an automatic voter registration model.
- A paper by the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust discusses automatic voter registration.
- There was a decision to reduce the number of MPs from 650 to 600 which was later reversed.
- The previous proposal reduced parliamentary constituencies from 650 to 600.
- Northern Ireland currently has 18 seats but was proposed to be reduced to 17 under the reduction plan.
- Rule 7 allows flexibility beyond the 5% tolerance for unreasonable infringement in geographical considerations.
- Gavin Robinson testified about the views of his party, the DUP, on the Parliamentary Constituencies Bill.
- The discussion included considerations for Northern Ireland's parliamentary boundaries and their alignment with UK constituencies.
- Sir David Amess thanked Mr. Robinson for providing insights into how other parties in Northern Ireland view the legislation.
- The planned change to reduce MPs from 650 to 600 would result in a reduction of around 12 seats for Wales.
- If the number of MPs remains at 650, Wales will still lose eight seats.
- Wales' proportional representation in the Commons will be around 5% under either plan.
- Wales has seen a slower rate of population increase compared to England.
- Wales risks losing more seats due to the Bill's automaticity if population trends continue.
- There are concerns that reducing the number of MPs in Wales could diminish Westminster's perceived importance to Welsh voters.
- Sir David Amess introduces Dr Rossiter and Professor Charles Pattie for a session on constituency boundary reviews.
- Professor Pattie has been studying elections and boundary reviews for about 30 or 35 years.
- Dr Rossiter has studied and published on the process of redrawing boundaries for approximately 40 years.
- The 2011 Act created a UK-wide quota and set rules for allocations to countries and regions.
- In an average eight-year period, there are about eight changes to national or English regional entitlements.
- With a fixed Parliament size of 650 seats, four new seats would be created and four abolished in each review cycle.
- Experts estimate that approximately half of seats experienced major change during previous reviews.
- The current review is expected to affect two thirds to three quarters of constituencies due to changes over a longer period (20 years).
- Maintaining 650 seats does not significantly help in minimizing the disruption.
- The Durack division in Western Australia covers 1.63 million sq km.
- Wales has an electoral quota of about 54,500 compared to 72,000 in the north-west of England.
- In Greater Manchester, constituency sizes range from 63,000 to 95,000.
- Professor Pattie argues that a higher variance (7% or 8%) reduces disruption to constituencies.
- The current system requires adding around 20,000 extra voters for equalization.
- Locality and community experience can influence voting patterns, though the extent is debated.
- Sir David Amess thanked Dr Rossiter and Professor Pattie for their evidence.
- The session was concluded due to no further questions from Committee Members.
- Further consideration of the bill is ordered to be adjourned until Thursday, June 25th at half-past Eleven o'clock.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy