<-- Back to proposed bills

Finance Bill - Sitting 10

18 June 2020

Proposing MP
Romford
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

Andrew Rosindell is proposing new clauses for the Finance Bill that relate to reviewing and assessing the impact of the Act on different parts of the UK, various scenarios concerning coronavirus support schemes, and specific business sectors. The statement addresses economic inequality across different regions of the UK, highlighting disparities in productivity, educational outcomes, and the impact of deindustrialisation. The MP discusses the economic benefits of the Union and highlights the varying impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on different sectors of the economy. The MP discusses the impact of withdrawing COVID-19 support schemes and supports Labour's new clause 3, proposing assessments of the Bill's economic impacts within a month. Andrew Rosindell discusses new clauses related to environmental assessments and sustainability goals in response to amendments proposed by other MPs. Wes Streeting moves new clause 4 to request a government review of the Finance Bill's impact on the environment and climate change. MP Stephen Flynn discusses new clauses regarding reviews of the Finance Bill's impact on UN sustainable development goals and climate change commitments. Andrew Rosindell discusses a new clause that requires the Chancellor to conduct an equality impact assessment of the Finance Bill. MP Wes Streeting discusses the need for a review of the Finance Bill's impact on individuals with protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010. The MP is discussing the need for comprehensive equality impact assessments on the Finance Bill measures. The Minister of Equalities is defending the government's approach to addressing inequalities and rejecting new clauses that require additional equality impact assessments. Andrew Rosindell is discussing new clause 22 regarding a review of the effects of the Finance Act on tax revenues. The MP discusses concerns about the lack of proper scrutiny and evaluation of tax reliefs in the UK, highlighting issues such as cost inefficiencies and potential unfairness. The MP discusses the issue of tax avoidance and the need for comprehensive anti-avoidance measures. The MP is discussing new clauses in the Finance Bill that would require government reviews of tax reliefs and their impact on tax revenue. The statement discusses new clauses requiring reviews of various aspects of the Finance Bill's provisions, including their impact on business investment, employment, productivity, and energy efficiency. Andrew Rosindell is addressing the debate on new clauses related to migration effects of the Finance Bill under different EU exit scenarios. MP Andrew Rosindell is discussing new clause 23 which aims to require the Chancellor of the Exchequer to review the impact of the Bill on poverty. The statement discusses the stark wealth and income inequalities in the UK and the increase in child poverty under Conservative-led governments. The statement discusses the Government's commitment to reducing poverty and child poverty, providing statistics on income inequality and government policies' redistributive effects. Andrew Rosindell is inquiring about the intention of another MP regarding a specific clause in the Finance Bill. The statement discusses amendments to Chapter 8 of Part 2 of ITEPA 2003 regarding workers' services provided through intermediaries to small clients. The statement addresses amendments to Chapter 10 of Part 2 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003. The statement discusses amendments to the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 regarding workers' services provided through intermediaries to public authorities or medium/large clients with a UK connection. The statement discusses amendments to tax legislation concerning managed service companies, worker services provided through intermediaries, and research and development expenditure relief. The statement discusses amendments to tax legislation regarding payments and benefits in engagements through intermediaries.

Action Requested

Rosindell is moving three new clauses: one requiring a review within six months of Royal Assent to assess the Act's impact on household incomes and GDP across the UK; another demanding a report within a month on the effects of the provisions under different scenarios for continuing or changing coronavirus support schemes; and a third requesting an assessment of the Bill's effect on 14 specific business sectors within six months of Royal Assent.

Key Facts

  • New Clause 3 requires the Chancellor to conduct an impact assessment of the Act on parts of the UK and regions of England, with consideration for household incomes and GDP.
  • New Clause 18 mandates a review within one month after passing the Bill concerning various economic factors under different scenarios for continuing or changing support schemes.
  • New Clause 21 requires an assessment of the impact of the Act on specific business sectors including leisure, retail, hospitality, tourism, financial services, and more.
  • Britain is home to nine of the 10 poorest regions in western Europe and also the richest region, inner London.
  • A child on free school meals in Hackney is three times more likely to attend university than an equally poor child in Hartlepool.
  • The gap in productivity between English regions is worth about £40 billion a year.
  • The west midlands could face the biggest impact of the economic crisis brought by covid-19, with potential declines in economic output as much as 50% in parts of the region.
  • The financial sector saw a fall of 5% in GVA from March to April.
  • Hospitality experienced an 88% drop in GVA during the same period.
  • Construction, arts, entertainment and recreation, and manufacturing sectors faced declines ranging from 40% to 24%.
  • New clause 18 seeks assessments of the impact of the Bill within a month.
  • The covered schemes are job retention, business interruption loan, bounce-back loan, and self-employed support.
  • More than 1 million people have fallen through gaps in these schemes.
  • UK's economy suffered its biggest monthly slump with a 20.4% GDP drop in April due to the pandemic.
  • New clause 19 requires the Chancellor to assess the Act's impact on UK meeting UN Sustainable Development Goals.
  • New clause 20 requires an assessment of the Act's impact on UK meeting Paris climate change commitments.
  • Both assessments must be laid before the House of Commons within six months of Royal Assent.
  • The past 22 years have produced 20 of the warmest years on record globally.
  • On July 25, 2019, the UK recorded a temperature of 38.7°C, its hottest day ever.
  • London is predicted to experience Barcelona-like summer temperatures by 2050 due to climate change.
  • Sea levels around London are forecasted to rise between 0.53 and 1.15 metres in the future.
  • Flash flooding caused by intense rainfall could become five times as frequent by the end of the century if no urgent steps are taken.
  • The melting rate of Greenland’s ice is equivalent to three Olympic-size swimming pools per second.
  • Up to 50 megatonnes of CO2 were released due to wildfires in Siberia, Antarctica and Greenland.
  • 95% of cities at extreme climate risk are located in Asia and Africa.
  • In 2018, drought-related food scarcity caused extreme shortages for nearly 840,000 people in South America.
  • The World Bank predicts that globally displaced people will reach 140 million by 2050 due to climate change impacts.
  • According to the IPPR’s environmental justice commission report, an additional £33 billion per year is needed just to meet the UK's net zero target.
  • New clause 19 would require a review of the Bill’s impact on meeting UN sustainable development goals.
  • The last UN SDG is on partnerships (goal 17) to achieve the goals.
  • DFID has done much to foster good relations across the world but was disbanded and moved into the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
  • Scotland embedded the SDGs in their national performance framework following public consultation.
  • New clause 20 seeks a review of the impact on meeting Paris climate change commitments with COP26 approaching.
  • The Scottish Government invested £62 million last week in north-east projects for sustainable transition.
  • The new clause requires a review of the Finance Bill's impact on individuals and groups with protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010.
  • The assessment must be conducted separately for each protected characteristic set out in section 4 of the Equality Act 2010.
  • Each assessment must report separately on the effects in each part of the United Kingdom and each region of England.
  • Women make up 69% of low-paid earners.
  • 36% of young women work in sectors affected by lockdowns, including restaurants, tourism, and retail.
  • Black African and Bangladeshi households have 10 times less wealth than white British households.
  • Around 18% of Bangladeshi workers are paid below the minimum wage compared to 3% of their white counterparts.
  • The Women’s Budget Group produced an excellent briefing criticizing the light-touch equality impact assessment.
  • For the lifetime limit for capital gains tax entrepreneurs’ relief, claimants tend to be older, men, of above-average means, selling their business or company shares on retirement.
  • The family resources survey could have been used but was not to assess impacts by age, ethnicity, disability etc.
  • In 2018, 81% of men had a driving licence compared with 70% of women; and 62% of Asians, 52% who are black, and 76% of whites have driving licences.
  • The Treasury conducts careful consideration of equality impacts for fiscal events involving protected characteristics.
  • The Government publishes tax information and impact notes (TIINs) summarizing equality impacts for individual tax measures.
  • An 'Impact on households' report is published alongside each Budget, detailing the effects of government measures on different income levels.
  • Over 13,000 BME-led businesses have received start-up loans since the scheme's launch in 2012.
  • The Chancellor must review the effects on tax revenues of the Act within six months of Royal Assent.
  • The review must estimate any change attributable to the provisions in this Act in the difference between required tax payments and actual payments.
  • The report must focus specifically on taxes payable by owners and employees of Scottish Limited Partnerships.
  • As of October 2019, the UK had 1,190 tax reliefs including 362 policy-motivated tax expenditures.
  • The cost of these tax expenditures is approaching 8% of GDP.
  • HMRC has costed only 111 out of 362 tax expenditures and published evaluations for just 15 since 2015.
  • The UK Government should address the tax gap which results from complex tax rules allowing avoidance opportunities.
  • SLPs allow individuals to conceal their identities legally, making them vulnerable to misuse for illicit activities.
  • Campaigners have revealed that over 700 British firms have been blacklisted in Ukraine for suspicious activity linked to money laundering involving SLPs.
  • New clause 6 would require a review of all tax reliefs within a year.
  • New clause 22 would require a review of the Bill's effect on tax revenue within six months.
  • HMRC publishes an annual 'Measuring tax gaps' report and evaluates major reliefs like R&D tax credits and entrepreneurs’ relief.
  • The avoidance tax gap fell from £5 billion in 2005-06 to £1.8 billion in 2017-18.
  • New Clause 10 requires a review of the impact on investment in parts of the UK and regions of England from changes made by section 29 and Schedule 4.
  • The review must consider business investment, employment, productivity, and energy efficiency.
  • 'Parts of the United Kingdom' includes England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland; 'regions of England' has the same meaning as used by the Office for National Statistics.
  • The clauses require the Chancellor to review migration effects under different EU exit scenarios.
  • These scenarios include leaving without a trade agreement, with one but remaining in the single market/customs union, or with an agreement but not remaining in them.
  • The Migration Advisory Committee recommended against regional variation across the UK.
  • New clause 23 requires the Chancellor of the Exchequer to conduct an assessment of the impact of this Act on poverty.
  • The assessment must consider the impact on absolute and relative poverty within six months of Royal Assent.
  • It also considers whether such studies should be a regular duty of the Office for Budget Responsibility.
  • Wealth inequalities: The richest 10% of households own 45% of national wealth while the poorest 50% own less than 10%.
  • Average FTSE 100 CEO is paid 145 times more than an average worker.
  • Britain’s top 1% have seen their share of household income triple in four years, while ordinary people struggle.
  • Over the past decade under Conservative governments, there has been the slowest growth in living standards since WWII.
  • 14 million people live below the poverty line including 4 million children.
  • The rate of 'Deaths of Despair' among men more than doubled since early 1990s due to financial hardship and hopelessness.
  • Social Mobility Commission's report: 8.4 million working-age adults in relative poverty, an increase of 500,000 since 2011/12; 4.2 million children in poverty now, projected rise to 5.2 million by 2022.
  • Social Mobility Commission's report states welfare changes over the past ten years have put many more children into poverty.
  • HMRC and DWP statistics show various constituencies with varying child poverty rates: e.g., Saffron Walden (10%), West Worcestershire (14%), South Cambridgeshire (9%).
  • 200,000 fewer people were living in absolute poverty in 2018-19 compared to 2009-10.
  • The poorest 60% of households receive more in public spending than they contribute in tax.
  • Households in the lowest income decile will receive over £4 in public spending for every £1 that they pay in tax in 2021.
  • Andrew Rosindell (Romford) (Conservative).
  • Hon. Member for Houghton and Sunderland South.
  • New clause 23.
  • Amendments are made to Chapter 8 of Part 2 of ITEPA 2003.
  • The amendments define conditions for a client to qualify as small or lack UK connection.
  • Specific provisions and sections such as section 50, 60A, and 60I are modified.
  • Amendments to Chapter 10 of Part 2 of ITEPA 2003.
  • No specific figures, dates, or names provided.
  • The amendments aim to address workers' services provided through intermediaries.
  • Section 61K is being amended to include cases where the client is a public authority, medium or large entity with a UK connection.
  • New sections are introduced to define 'medium or large' entities and provide guidance on status determination statements.
  • Amendments involve section 61D of ITEPA 2003.
  • Insertion of new sections such as 688AA into ITEPA 2003.
  • Amendment to section 141A of CTA 2009.
  • Adjustments to definitions and applications under Chapter 10 of Part 2 of ITEPA 2003.
  • Amendments affect tax years 2021-22 and subsequent years.
  • Relevant to construction contracts and expenditure incurred on or after April 6, 2021.
  • Pertains to Chapter 8 and 10 of Part 2 of ITEPA 2003.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy