<-- Back to proposed bills

Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords]

17 June 2020

Proposing MP
Epping Forest
Type
Bill Debate

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement addresses an error in the amendment paper and introduces an amendment to extend the minimum legal period for a divorce. The statement discusses amendments and new clauses related to divorce, dissolution, and separation proceedings, including provisions for financial support during the process, reporting requirements, no-fault divorces with consent, legal aid eligibility, and reviews of financial impacts on families. Eleanor Laing is opposing the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, arguing that it undermines the commitment in marriage by making divorce easier and quicker. Fiona Bruce discusses the importance of relationship counselling and pre-marriage courses to prevent family breakdowns. Fiona Bruce discusses new clause 1 which aims to increase support for marriage through investment in relationship counselling, addressing the issue of family breakdown and its costs. Labour supports the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill which aims to reform outdated divorce laws by allowing no-fault divorces and reducing separation periods. The MP discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords], focusing on the minimum period required for divorce proceedings. Eleanor Laing discusses amendments to the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill focusing on reducing divorce waiting periods, extending legal aid for divorces, conducting impact reviews, addressing financial abuse as a condition for civil legal aid, and reforming bereavement support eligibility. Bob Neill discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords] and argues in favor of its provisions to make divorce easier and less confrontational. Bob Neill is discussing the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill and its amendments, particularly addressing the issue of fault-based divorce and the potential delays caused by maintaining such a system. The MP discusses concerns regarding proposed amendments to the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill and their potential impact on financial matters and mediation. Stella Creasy discusses new clause 9 which aims to address financial support for children whose parents are not married or divorced. Christopher Chope is speaking against changes proposed by the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, arguing that they undermine the values of justice and remove the need for evidence in divorce proceedings. Christopher Chope discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords], expressing skepticism about its impact on marriage and family values. Andrea Leadsom discusses her concerns about the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords], questioning whether it adequately addresses the well-being of individuals and families during relationship breakdowns. The speaker expresses reservations about the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill and highlights the importance of supporting marriages through increased funding for relationship support services. The statement discusses the importance of marriage and relationship support services in divorce reform. The statement discusses support for marriage preparation and relationship enrichment through grants. The statement discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords], focusing on amendment 1 proposed by Fiona Bruce to extend the legal time period for divorce from six months to 12 months. Sir Edward Leigh is debating new clause 3 of the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords], which aims to replicate Scottish law allowing for no-fault divorce after one year of separation. The debate focuses on amendments to the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill regarding divorce proceedings, specifically the introduction of a no-fault divorce option. The speaker discusses the impact of conflict during divorce on children and supports the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill for its potential to reduce acrimony in family breakdown. Eleanor Laing supports the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill and addresses concerns about outdated divorce laws. John Hayes critiques the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, arguing it fails to address the complexities of relationship breakdowns. The debate focuses on the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords] which aims to remove unnecessary obstacles from divorce proceedings but is criticised for undermining marriage stability. The statement addresses amendments to the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill that aim to introduce a minimum period before someone can apply for a conditional divorce order. Eleanor Laing discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords] focusing on the minimum period for divorce and financial applications. The statement discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, addressing concerns about its impact on families and marriage while emphasizing that it is a measured reform aimed at reducing conflict during divorce proceedings. The statement discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords], which aims to modernize divorce laws by removing the need to prove fault. The statement discusses opposition to the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords], arguing it undermines marriage by allowing no-fault divorces.

Action Requested

The amendment proposes extending the minimum legal period for a divorce from six months to one year, including an additional six weeks between conditional and final orders.

Key Facts

  • The names of Bob Blackman and Nick Fletcher were incorrectly published in support of new clause 4 and new clause 5.
  • The amendment would extend the minimum legal period for a divorce from six months to one year.
  • New Clause 1 would amend Section 22 of the Family Law Act 1996 to mandate support services before and during marriage, including counselling for couples seeking divorce.
  • New Clause 2 requires an annual report on the impact of divorce proceedings starting no later than 18 months after the Act comes into force.
  • New Clause 3 proposes reducing the separation period from two years to one year with consent for a no-fault divorce in England and Wales.
  • New Clause 4 would amend Schedule 1 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 to include divorce proceedings under legal aid eligibility.
  • New Clause 5 mandates a review within six months on the cost-benefit analysis of providing legal aid for divorce proceedings.
  • New Clause 6 amends the definition of domestic violence in legal aid family matters to include financial abuse as defined by the Care Act 2014.
  • The Bill is criticized as sending out the wrong message at the wrong time.
  • In a national opinion survey, 71% believed fault should remain part of divorce law.
  • The Government's consultation showed that 80% opposed the proposals.
  • The amendment aims to extend the minimum legal period for divorce from six months to one year.
  • New clause 1 would increase funding for relationship counselling and provide support for couples applying for divorce.
  • Only 9% of married couples who split one year later are high conflict couples.
  • Over 40% increase in divorce inquiries due to the current lockdown crisis.
  • The Government committed £2.5 million towards marriage support services in the last Budget.
  • The Government invested £46.9 million in relationship support services between 2014-2019.
  • Family breakdown costs the UK at least £51 billion annually.
  • Amendment 2 would define the start of divorce proceedings clearly, ensuring that the 20-week period starts after service on the other party is confirmed at court.
  • Labour supports reforming outdated divorce laws.
  • There is currently no such thing as a no-fault divorce in UK law.
  • People must spend two years separated before filing for divorce if there is no blame.
  • If one party objects to divorce, the other must remain married for five years.
  • Amendment 1 would extend the minimum legal period for divorce from six months to one year.
  • The right hon. Member for New Forest West (Sir Desmond Swayne) stated on Second Reading that removing fault from the process would diminish parents using children as weapons in divorces.
  • Amendments 3, 4 and 5 are seen as attempts to prolong divorce proceedings.
  • Financial settlements should be reached quickly to enable a divorcing couple to live apart.
  • New clause 3 aims to reduce the divorce waiting period from two years to one year.
  • New clause 4 seeks to extend legal aid for divorce proceedings.
  • New clause 5 proposes a review within six months on the impact of extending legal aid.
  • New clause 6 would list financial abuse as a specific condition for civil legal aid.
  • Bereavement support is currently only available if parents are married, denying benefits to unmarried couples.
  • Bob Neill has personal experience as a constituency MP and lawyer.
  • The Bill aims to make the divorce process easier and less confrontational.
  • Neill agrees with supporting marriage and relationship support but believes it should be addressed separately from this Bill.
  • About 10% of divorce petitions do not proceed to final conclusion.
  • Some divorces can be prolonged up to two or five years due to procedural reasons or lack of cooperation from respondents.
  • The Family Law Act 1996 pilot information meetings showed that people often want to move on by this stage.
  • Around 60% of divorces in England are based on adultery allegations.
  • The existing legislation retains the ability to take conduct into account when dealing with financial matters.
  • Withdrawing legal aid from family cases did not result in more people going to mediation as expected.
  • Lawyers act as gateways to mediation, and individuals without legal assistance are unlikely to seek mediation.
  • New clause 9 seeks to address the consequences for children whose parents are not married or divorced.
  • The bereavement support allowance is not available to partners who were not married or divorced, affecting about 2,000 families a year and 3,500 children in total.
  • In August 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that denying widowed parent’s allowance to unmarried parents was incompatible with human rights legislation.
  • The Bill retains irretrievable breakdown as the ground for divorce but allows it to be proved by mere assertion without evidence.
  • New clause 3 proposes a reduction of separation period from two years to one year, similar to Scotland where 95% of divorces are on this basis.
  • Some 50% of people regret getting divorced due to emotional reasons such as still loving their partner or missing them.
  • The Marriage Guidance Council changed its name to Relate.
  • The DWP programme for marriage guidance services is only funded for the next nine months.
  • Chope criticizes the lack of ambition in the Bill, suggesting it undermines marriage security.
  • Leadsom experienced divorce as a child.
  • Up to 50% of people later come to regret their divorce due to various reasons such as loneliness or financial deprivation.
  • Leadsom advocates for a period of reflection after six months of judicial separation.
  • The estimated cost of family breakdown is £51 billion per year.
  • Government forecast spending on relationship support in the last financial year was £10.2 million.
  • Counselling and relationship education resulted in positive changes in individuals’ relationship quality, well-being, and communication.
  • Couple counselling and certain types of marriage preparation were cost effective.
  • The Family Law Act 1996 mentions marriage and relationship support services.
  • A previous Lord Chancellor, Lord Mackay, stated that such services were an essential part of divorce reform.
  • In 2018, there were 91,299 divorces in England and Wales.
  • Around 10% of people who engage in marriage counselling decide not to divorce.
  • New clause 1 and amendment 7 are identical.
  • The amendments aim to make grants available for marriage preparation, enrichment, support, civil partnerships, and relationship support.
  • Labour and Conservative Governments have supported this issue since the Denning report of 1947.
  • The Government's reducing parental conflict programme is narrowly focused on working couples with parental conflict.
  • Amendment 1 would increase the minimal legal time period for divorce to 12 months instead of six.
  • The current law has a two-year separation period with or without fault, accounting for about 40% of divorces.
  • In 1996, Parliament amended the recommended year-long pause for reflection to 18 months for couples with children or where one party is being divorced against their will.
  • The current law sets down five facts that must be established before a divorce is granted.
  • New clause 3 would allow for no-fault divorce after one year of separation, similar to Scottish law.
  • Baroness Deech stated that the essence of reform is speed.
  • Sir Edward Leigh's parents had marriage problems during WWII but chose to stay together.
  • A poll showed 72% believe no-fault divorce may make people more blasé about divorce.
  • The Scottish approach allows only 5% of divorces to be based on fault.
  • Edward Leigh's amendments aim to shorten separation periods to one year with consent and two years without.
  • A public consultation showed that 80% disagreed with the proposed changes.
  • The organisations cited include Early Intervention Foundation, Tavistock Relationships, and Local Government Association.
  • The MP has been married for 22 years.
  • The state's involvement is limited to issuing a marriage certificate.
  • The Bill aims to allow blameless divorces without contest.
  • Current laws can be costly and prolong suffering for those seeking divorce.
  • Amendments 1, 2, and 4 are opposed by the MP as they may hinder individuals from escaping abusive relationships or obtaining a quick divorce.
  • The Bill is seen as an imperfect solution to issues inherent in human relationships.
  • Most respondents to the Government's consultation did not want the changes proposed in the bill.
  • Three-quarters of respondents disagreed with the Government plans.
  • The Law Society suggests 9 months for reflection, while previous suggestions were 12 months.
  • Centre for Social Justice evidence shows children do worse in broken families educationally.
  • Resolution represents 6,500 family justice professionals supporting the Bill.
  • 'Finding Fault?' study found that 43% of respondents disagreed with fault-based reasons cited in divorce petitions.
  • Currently, there is no minimum period for securing a divorce using the online service; the average time up to the conditional order is 17 weeks.
  • The Government proposes a minimum period of 20 weeks before a conditional order and six months in total.
  • Around 80% of divorces are expected to take longer due to these measures.
  • A marriage still endures after the initial application, requiring three active steps for dissolution.
  • The Nuffield study in 2017 noted that only one of 300 cases ended in attempted reconciliation after the legal process began.
  • The MP considers a total minimum period of six months for divorce proceedings, acknowledging the impact on victims of domestic abuse and those facing financial hardship.
  • Amendment 2 addresses joint applications while Amendment 3 seeks to prevent either party from making financial applications during the 20-week period unless agreed upon.
  • The Bill introduces a new 20-week minimum period between the start of proceedings and the conditional order.
  • The Government will review financial provision law which has remained unchanged for nearly 50 years.
  • Two delegated powers in the Bill will be subject to the affirmative mechanism via enhanced scrutiny procedure.
  • £2.5 million is allocated to fund research into integrating family services, including the emerging family hub model.
  • The indicative timetable for implementation of reforms is autumn 2021.
  • The statement addresses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords].
  • Early legal advice was removed from some areas due to funding cuts.
  • Legal aid for early advice in matrimonial matters is recommended to be reinstated.
  • Divorce costs £50 billion per year in the UK.
  • Only £10 million is spent annually on reconciliation efforts.
  • The bill allows for divorces to be completed within six months without providing reasons.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy