<-- Back to proposed bills

Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords]

08 June 2020

Proposing MP
South Swindon
Type
Bill Debate

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill aimed at making the legal process of divorce less painful and traumatic. The statement discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill which aims to reform divorce law in a way that reduces conflict and incentivises couples to work together during separation. The statement discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, which aims to reform divorce laws by removing the need for couples to prove fault. Robert Buckland addresses concerns about the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords], clarifying that it is not intended to facilitate 'quickie divorces' but rather to regularise divorce proceedings. Robert Buckland is addressing the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords], which aims to reform the divorce process in England and Wales. The statement discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill introduced by the Secretary of State, which aims to modernize divorce laws. The statement discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, which aims to reform divorce proceedings by providing a period for reflection and mutual agreement between partners. The statement discusses support for the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill which aims to remove the requirement to prove fault for divorce. Stella Creasy discusses the impact of divorce and bereavement on children's entitlements to financial support. The statement discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill aimed at making divorce processes kinder by reducing conflict between separated couples. The debate is about the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill which aims to remove fault from divorce proceedings. The statement discusses concerns about the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, which aims to reduce the time required for no-fault divorce. The statement discusses opposition to the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords], arguing that it undermines the permanence of marriage and fails to address important issues related to divorce. The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill aims to ease divorce proceedings in England and Wales. The statement discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords], focusing on modernising divorce proceedings to reduce acrimony and improve outcomes for families. The statement discusses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords] and its impact on modern family law. The statement addresses the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill which aims to reform the divorce process in England and Wales by removing fault-based requirements. This statement is about the procedural steps for reading the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill [Lords] a second time in the House of Commons.

Action Requested

The Minister proposes no specific new actions but reaffirms the Government's commitment to supporting family initiatives like the troubled families programme and reducing parental conflict programme. He also commits to considering a review of financial remedies provision on divorce as recommended by Lord Keen.

Key Facts

  • The Bill seeks to make the legal process less painful, less traumatic for couples.
  • The Government invested £39 million into the reducing parental conflict programme.
  • A commitment has been made to consider how a review of the law governing financial remedies provision on divorce may take place.
  • Reform of divorce law is supported by lawyers, judges, mediators, the Marriage Foundation, and academic research.
  • The Bill aims to prevent quick divorces and ensure a minimum six-month term for divorce proceedings.
  • Current law can incentivise conflict by requiring applicants to provide details of unreasonable behaviour in divorce petitions.
  • The number of divorces has declined in recent years but the number of marriages has also decreased since 1972.
  • Around two out of five divorces rely on a two-year separation fact if both parties consent.
  • Three out of five petitioners for divorce rely on conduct facts such as unreasonable behaviour, adultery or desertion.
  • The Bill seeks to regularise and equalise the position regarding minimum terms for divorce.
  • It addresses the complexity of causes of divorce which often evolve over a long period of time.
  • Under existing law, legal fact diverges significantly from the reality of why marriages break down.
  • The Bill maintains a two-stage process but introduces a new minimum period of 20 weeks for divorces.
  • A statement of irretrievable breakdown will be conclusive evidence that the marriage or civil partnership has broken down, removing the possibility of contesting the decision in most cases (only 2% of spouses currently do).
  • Couples will now be able to make a joint application where the decision to divorce is mutual.
  • Sir James Munby described current divorce laws as hypocritical and based on intellectual dishonesty.
  • Couples are currently required to evidence unreasonable behaviour, adultery or desertion for a divorce application.
  • Separation periods of two or five years may be necessary if neither party is willing to make an application.
  • The minimum time for a joint application for divorce will be 26 weeks.
  • Women’s Aid highlights that 77% of women killed by their partners are murdered in the year following separation due to current divorce laws.
  • Legal representation in family cases has dropped from 58% before the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 to 36%.
  • The Bill is supported by Resolution, representing 6,500 family law practitioners.
  • Every senior member of the judiciary with experience in the family field supports the Bill.
  • Sir Paul Coleridge, chairman of the Marriage Foundation and former High Court judge, endorses the need for an intelligent process to end unsustainable marriages.
  • 2,000 families annually face losing a parent.
  • 3.5 million people choose to have children without getting married.
  • Five families every day lose entitlements when a family member dies.
  • The Bill aims to make divorce processes kinder by reducing conflict between separated couples.
  • Divorce proceedings will take a minimum of six months.
  • The Family Law Act 1996 identified funding for relationship support services as necessary for divorce reform.
  • One in ten marriages was saved at the point of divorce through counselling offered under the 1996 Act.
  • The Bill aims to make divorce easier by removing fault requirements.
  • A consultation found that 80% of respondents were opposed to this measure.
  • MP Edward Leigh cites Hillary Clinton's view on the permissiveness of divorce laws and their impact on children.
  • The Bill proposes reducing the waiting period for no-fault divorce from two years to six months.
  • Department for Work and Pensions estimates show that currently 12% of all children have parents in a distressed relationship, with up to 21% in workless families.
  • Research identifies that parental conflict is more significant than separation itself in affecting child development.
  • The Bill is seen as sending a message that divorce will be quicker and easier.
  • There could be an immediate increase in divorces following the introduction of no-fault divorce.
  • Some family lawyers are not enthusing about the Bill.
  • The Bill aims to ease unnecessary conflict for couples and children.
  • There will be a minimum of 20 weeks from the start of proceedings before someone can give confirmation to the court.
  • Together with the existing six-week period, the legal process will take a minimum of six months.
  • The speaker was six months old when their parents divorced.
  • Some divorces take up to two years to complete legally.
  • The Bill aims to reduce legal divorce proceedings to six months.
  • The current law requires a minimum two-year separation before mutual agreement divorce can occur.
  • 43% of those identified by their spouse as being at fault for the marriage breakdown disagree with the reasons cited in the divorce petition.
  • Legal costs associated with divorce procedures can be costly, ranging into thousands of pounds.
  • The Bill aims to remove unnecessary and artificial flashpoints in divorce proceedings.
  • 43% of those identified as being at fault disagree with the reasons cited in the petition.
  • Only 2% of cases are contested and fewer progress to a contested court hearing.
  • Hon. Members are asked to leave the Chamber by specific doors.
  • The instruction will likely be given 28 minutes after calling the Division.
  • Ayes: 231, Noes: 16.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy