<-- Back to proposed bills
Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Bill
10 March 2020
Type
Bill Debate
At a Glance
Issue Summary
Chi Onwurah is proposing an amendment to expand the definition of persons who can request telecommunications services, including rental tenants and other legal occupants. Chi Onwurah discusses the Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Bill and its limited ambition to address broadband deployment. Chi Onwurah discusses the risks and costs associated with removing Huawei from UK telecommunications infrastructure. The statement addresses concerns over Huawei's role in UK telecommunications infrastructure and proposes legislative measures to manage high-risk vendors. Chi Onwurah is discussing an amendment to ensure competition and security in telecommunications infrastructure. The statement addresses concerns over national security risks posed by using Huawei technology and calls for government intervention to prevent dependence on high-risk vendors. The statement addresses the need for the UK government to take decisive action against high-risk vendors like Huawei in telecommunications infrastructure. The statement discusses the importance of digital connectivity for economic growth and supports the Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Bill, while raising concerns about security risks associated with high-risk vendors like Huawei. The statement discusses the risk posed by Huawei's involvement in the UK's 5G system and calls for a decision that prioritizes national security over cost and timeline. The statement discusses concerns about the security and reliability of telecommunications infrastructure, particularly regarding high-risk vendors like Huawei. The statement addresses the government's plan to reduce reliance on high-risk vendors in telecommunications infrastructure. Chi Onwurah is questioning Oliver Dowden about new commitments regarding telecommunications infrastructure diversification. The statement discusses amendments to the Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Bill regarding service requests by tenants and competition among broadband providers. John Nicolson supports amendment 1, criticising the government's approach to Huawei in the context of national security. The MP discusses the importance of ensuring secure telecommunications infrastructure and avoiding high-risk vendors like Huawei. Bob Seely discusses security risks associated with Huawei's involvement in telecommunications infrastructure. The statement discusses concerns about Huawei's dominance in telecommunication infrastructure and its potential long-term impact on national security and market competition. Chi Onwurah criticizes the Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Bill for being insufficient and potentially derailing due to lack of long-term vision on full-fibre, 5G, and national networks. The speaker discusses the Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Bill's potential risks of becoming fragmented and failing to address Scotland's unique geographic challenges.
Action Requested
Amendment 2 aims to include rental tenants and others in contractual relationships with lessees or freeholders as those eligible to request electronic telecommunications services. This would ensure that more individuals have access to necessary telecoms infrastructure and support competition among service providers.
Key Facts
- Amendment 2 inserts a clause after “lessee in occupation”.
- The amendment aims to include rental tenants and other legal occupants who may not own the lease but are in contractual relationships with lessees or freeholders.
- Chi Onwurah highlights the UK's declining telecoms infrastructure under Conservative Administrations.
- The Bill does not clearly define tenants' rights to request gigabit broadband.
- Amendment 2 seeks to expand the definition to include rental tenants and other legal occupants.
- There are 4.5 million households in the private rented sector.
- Huawei is bound by China's National Intelligence Law to support national intelligence work.
- The National Cyber Security Centre has designated Huawei as a high-risk vendor.
- Mobile UK estimates tearing Huawei out of networks would cost £7 billion and delay 5G by 18 months.
- The telecoms supply chain review was published in July with promises for diversifying the supply chain.
- Chi Onwurah supports the NCSC's position but argues that risks are not being managed as advised.
- Amendment 4 differs from amendment 1 in timing and scope of application to newly deployed infrastructure.
- Ofcom is proposed to take up regulatory powers, but details on its resources and enforcement mechanisms are lacking.
- The amendment addresses concerns over monopolistic practices and poor cyber-security in telecoms infrastructure.
- The Bill is described as mediocre with minimal impact on telecommunications infrastructure, rated at about 0.5 out of 10 by the speaker.
- Amendment 6 aims to support customers and promote best practices for the era of internet of things.
- The National Cyber Security Centre considers there is a realistic likelihood that the UK would become 'nationally dependent' on Huawei within three years without government intervention.
- Three companies capable of doing 5G development in the free market world are Nokia, Ericsson and Samsung.
- All close allies of the UK disagree with using Huawei technology for security reasons.
- The UK's decision on Huawei could influence other countries globally.
- Smaller nations may follow suit if the UK allows Huawei dominance.
- High-risk vendors pose a long-term security risk to telecoms infrastructure.
- There is urgency in setting a clear end date for high-risk vendor involvement.
- The Scottish Finance Secretary announced spending on digital connectivity projects will double up to £63.4 million in 2020-21.
- SNP supports the Bill that would benefit telecoms operators and contractors by reducing costs associated with delivering digital infrastructure.
- Huawei is considered a high-risk vendor due to potential threats to UK interests under China’s national intelligence law of 2017.
- The US plans to implement 5G without Huawei.
- Countries like Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and Japan oppose Huawei involvement due to national security concerns.
- The UK’s decision could influence other nations' choices regarding Huawei.
- The Government's decision involves excluding high-risk vendors from sensitive network parts with a strict 35% cap on market share in non-sensitive areas.
- The National Security Council is keeping the 35% cap under review and aims to reduce reliance on high-risk vendors over time through market diversification.
- A new supply chain capacity will be developed with Five Eyes and other partners during this Parliament.
- The government aims to cap reliance on high-risk vendors at 35% currently.
- Within this Parliament, the Government will develop new supply chain capacity through collaboration with Five Eyes partners.
- Legislation related to controls on high-risk vendors will be brought forward before summer.
- Chi Onwurah is questioning Oliver Dowden's commitments on telecommunications infrastructure.
- Oliver Dowden commits to bringing back the telecoms security Bill by summer.
- The commitment includes setting a timetable for supply chain diversification within this Parliament.
- The amendment aims to ensure that assured shorthold tenancy or assured tenancy agreements are captured by the Bill.
- The Government will not compel commercial companies to alter their service delivery unless evidence of a problem exists.
- A new connections provided by operators as part of the Bill will allow greater efficiency and connectivity for consumers.
- John Nicolson supports amendment 1.
- Huawei is described as an arm of the Chinese state, which frustrates Five Eyes members.
- The debate involves concerns over national security and cyber-security threats.
- United States, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia view certain technological approaches as secure.
- There are concerns about Huawei's relationship with the Chinese state.
- The Australian Signals Directorate states that a potential threat anywhere in a 5G network is a threat to the whole network.
- China has a poor reputation for IP theft and cyber-attacks; Chinese Liberation Army members were indicted for hacking Equifax.
- Huawei's systems in African Union headquarters sent information to China between 2012 and 2017.
- Huawei offers generous interest-free credit terms, up to 30 years, which undermines competitors.
- The Huawei oversight board has provided limited assurance that risks can be mitigated over time but finds no material progress since 2018.
- Huawei's credit line is $100 billion, allowing it to undercut competitors.
- Other countries like France, the US, Vietnam, South Korea, and Australia are either planning or building 5G networks without relying on Huawei.
- The Intelligence and Security Committee report in 2013 highlighted poor governance around Huawei's entry into UK systems.
- Chi Onwurah expresses concern over the Bill's inadequacy in addressing full-fibre broadband infrastructure needs.
- She calls for Government assurances on tenants' access to provisions of the legislation and competitive access to multiple-dwelling units.
- Onwurah questions the details of the Huawei diversification strategy promised by the Secretary of State.
- The SNP Scottish Government have committed £600 million to superfast broadband rollout.
- The SNP defines world-class digital infrastructure as 100% access to 30 megabits per second (the EU standard).
- Scotland has 94 permanently inhabited islands.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy