<-- Back to proposed bills
Skills and Post-16 Education Bill [Lords] - Sitting 1
30 November 2021
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement discusses amendments to the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill regarding local skills improvement plans and the involvement of mayoral combined authorities and the Greater London Authority. The statement discusses the importance of the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill in addressing past funding cuts to further education. The statement discusses the relationship between university and vocational education in the context of skills development. The statement discusses the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill's amendments regarding local skills improvement plans. The statement discusses the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill and the importance of local skills improvement plans in involving employers and further education colleges. The statement discusses issues related to the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill and the approach to skills development in relation to industrial strategy and local devolution. The Minister is addressing concerns about the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill, particularly regarding the designation of Local Skills Improvement Partnerships (LSIPs). The minister addresses concerns about the interaction between Government amendment 4 and clause 6 of the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill, clarifying that there is no friction between them. The statement discusses amendments to clause 1 of the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill, focusing on local skills improvement plans. The statement discusses concerns about the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill, particularly regarding the role of local employer organizations in directing college education and potentially universities. The statement discusses concerns about the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill amendments that remove references to local authorities and mayoral combined authorities, impacting the ability of these bodies to collaborate closely with other agencies in providing careers guidance. The debate centres on amendments to the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill that would remove references to schools, further education institutions, community learning providers, specialist designated institutions, universities, and local authorities from participating in the development of skills plans. The statement discusses concerns about changes to the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill that exclude local authorities and post-16 education providers from the creation of local skills plans. The debate focuses on the Skills and Post-16 Education Bill, specifically addressing the role of employers in developing local skills improvement plans. Maria Miller addresses amendments to ensure Local Skills Improvement Plans include input from disabled people and specific actions to reduce the disability employment gap.
Action Requested
Maria Miller introduces Government amendment 5, which places a duty on the Secretary of State to approve and publish a local skills improvement plan only when satisfied that the designated employer representative body has considered the views of relevant mayoral combined authorities or the Greater London Authority during development. Further details will be provided in statutory guidance.
Key Facts
- Mayoral combined authorities and the Greater London Authority play vital roles in supporting local communities, developing economies, and strengthening skills systems.
- A duty is placed on the Secretary of State to approve and publish a local skills improvement plan based on consideration of relevant mayoral combined authority or Greater London Authority views during development.
- Further details will be set out in statutory guidance informed by ongoing engagement with stakeholders.
- Labour Government's investment in skills under previous administrations was greater than during the past 11 years.
- Apprenticeship levy led to a reduction in the number of apprenticeships.
- Previous Skills Ministers and Chancellors have made similar claims about placing employers at the heart of the skills strategy.
- The statement addresses the view that university education is not valuable for skills development.
- Toby Perkins argues against framing further education and higher education as opposing sectors.
- Andrew Gwynne mentions the importance of vocational higher education qualifications.
- Government amendment 5 is criticized for initially excluding metro mayors and combined authorities.
- Labour proposes a holistic approach involving public and private sector employers, further education colleges, and independent training providers.
- The MP questions the centralisation agenda of the Bill and seeks protections for existing funding arrangements with metro Mayors.
- The Bill aims to involve local businesses in shaping the curriculum of further education colleges.
- Devolution has led to more involvement of mayoral combined authorities in skills improvement plans.
- Greater Manchester's adult education budget was devolved, leading to strategies like 'Greater Manchester Skills for Growth' and 'Bridge GM'.
- Amendment 4 removes subsection (6) on future issues around climate change and environmental goals.
- Andrew Gwynne highlights the link between skills agenda and industrial strategy.
- Toby Perkins criticizes the government's approach as moving towards a German-style skills system but with reluctance to implement it fully.
- Ben Bradley raises concerns about safeguards for skills plans in areas without combined authorities.
- The Local Government Association has expressed concerns about an integrated, place-based approach to skills reforms.
- Matt Western raised issues regarding devolution and centralisation of powers in Whitehall.
- Emma Hardy provided a concrete example from Hull illustrating the complexity of local governance structures.
- Government amendment 4 requires the Secretary of State to have regard to clause 1(6) and (6A) when approving and publishing a plan.
- Subsections (6)(b) and (6)(c) will not stand part of the Bill, but section 1 of the Climate Change Act 2008 is still considered important.
- The amendment keeps all of clause 1(6), including paragraphs (a), (b), and (c).
- Amendment 6 removes specific references to further education providers and other consultees.
- Clause 1 places duties on relevant providers to co-operate with employer representative bodies.
- The amendments reverse a Lords amendment made at Report stage.
- The amendments seek to reduce partnership working between education providers and local employer organizations.
- Concerns are raised about how chambers of commerce will address the specific needs of people with disabilities or special educational plans.
- Government amendment 7 leaves out references to further education providers, community learning providers, designated institutions, and universities.
- Toby Perkins expresses concerns about small businesses' access to apprenticeships since the introduction of the apprenticeship levy.
- Government amendment 9 removes references to 'other local bodies' from clause concerning post-16 technical education.
- Rachel Hopkins supports retaining amendments introduced in the House of Lords that allow for collaboration between LSIPs and other agencies.
- The University of Bedfordshire has a new STEM building providing industry-standard training.
- Luton Sixth Form College offers BTEC courses in health and social care.
- Warwickshire College Group is one of the sixth largest colleges in the country.
- The Local Government Association believes that the reforms need to be implemented as part of an integrated, place-based approach.
- The government amendment agreed by the Committee removes a role for mayoral combined authorities.
- Subsection (7)(b)(ii) refers to regional and local authorities, including Mayoral Combined Authorities, with specific reference to their published plans and strategies.
- Post-16 education providers active in the specified area are excluded from deliberations on skills plans.
- The UK Battery Industrialisation Centre was developed through collaboration between universities, local authorities, and businesses.
- Graphene development at the University of Manchester exemplifies successful academic-industry partnerships.
- Amendment 7 aims to remove references to non-employer bodies in local skills planning.
- £17 million has been invested for upskilling in the heavy goods vehicle sector.
- The Bill mandates that local skills improvement plans consider national skills priorities.
- Amendment 1 inserts language requiring LSIPs to consider views of relevant community groups, including disabled people.
- Amendments 2 and 28 aim to ensure LSIPs identify actions reducing the disability employment gap.
- Amendment 34 requires listing specific strategies for learners with special educational needs or health care plans into employment.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy