<-- Back to proposed bills
Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill - Sitting 2
16 November 2021
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement discusses the risks associated with the Regulated Asset Base (RAB) model for financing nuclear projects, particularly highlighting potential cost overruns and construction delays. The statement addresses the potential risks associated with the Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill and suggests measures to protect consumers from cost overruns in large infrastructure projects like nuclear plants. Yvonne Fovargue announces the conclusion of questioning in the Public Bill Committee session on the Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill. Yvonne Fovargue introduces witnesses to discuss the impact of the RAB financing model versus Contracts for Difference (CfD) on consumers in relation to large nuclear projects. The statement discusses the role of the Revenue Adequacy Based (RAB) model in financing nuclear power plants and its potential impact on attracting private capital for large-scale nuclear projects. The statement discusses the risks and benefits associated with the RAB financing model for nuclear projects, particularly small modular reactors (SMRs), and emphasizes the importance of proven technology and leveraging lessons learned from previous nuclear programmes. Yvonne Fovargue is discussing the need for investment in nuclear energy projects, specifically highlighting the importance of SMRs and gigawatt-sized reactors to meet increasing electricity demand. The statement discusses the regulatory process, timelines, workforce transition, and financing models for nuclear energy projects in the UK. The statement discusses the importance of securing financing models for nuclear energy to ensure control over electricity generation in the UK. Yvonne Fovargue is chairing a session to examine witnesses on nuclear energy financing. The speakers discuss the involvement of Chinese companies in UK nuclear projects and the funding allocated to Sizewell C. Yvonne Fovargue asks if there is sufficient detail in clause 1 of the Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill regarding the designation of a nuclear company. The statement discusses the nuclear capacity requirements and the government's role in supporting the nuclear sector. The statement is about introducing witnesses to give evidence on the topic of nuclear energy. The discussion focuses on the viability and effectiveness of nuclear power as a solution for reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to efficiency measures and renewable energy sources. Yvonne Fovargue addresses the Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill and discusses concerns about recovery of advance payments from consumers for unfinished nuclear projects. The statement addresses concerns about the prioritization and effectiveness of nuclear energy as a tool for combating climate change. Yvonne Fovargue is addressing the Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill and discussing the debate around firm power requirements and the role of nuclear energy in meeting these needs. The discussion centres around the Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill and its implications for Sizewell C project financing and decommissioning risks. Yvonne Fovargue concludes the oral evidence session of the Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill Committee hearing.
Action Requested
No specific action is requested. The discussion highlights concerns about consumer protection under the RAB model and questions whether current mechanisms in place are adequate to protect consumers from significant cost overruns.
Key Facts
- New nuclear projects have a track record of coming in 20% over budget within Europe and 100% worldwide since 1990.
- Construction time overruns average 40% for European projects and 90% globally since 1990.
- Under the RAB model, consumers start paying towards project costs from the commencement of construction.
- The Bill does not specify materiality thresholds for cost caps.
- The developer should bear more costs if there are significant overruns.
- Appeals processes should be bidirectional to ensure scrutiny on both sides.
- An independent third-party impact assessment should precede binding agreements.
- Thames Tideway and Heathrow terminal 5 projects benefited from RAB models but had cost overruns.
- Sovacool et al. found that 97% of new nuclear plants came in over budget with an average overrun of 117%.
- Flyvbjerg et al. reported a median cost overrun of 68% and schedule overrun of 40% for nuclear projects.
- Hinkley Point C is estimated to cost at least £24 billion.
- Yvonne Fovargue informs that the allotted time for questioning has ended.
- The session was part of a Public Bill Committee meeting on the Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill.
- Chris Ball estimates RAB financing adds £1 per month to consumer bills.
- Alan Woods forecasts Rolls-Royce's reactor under RAB at £35/MWh versus £60/MWh under CfD.
- Dawn James notes hidden costs in the CfD model passed on to consumers over time.
- The RAB model is viewed as essential for encouraging sufficient private capital investment into large-scale nuclear projects.
- There is a need to balance risk allocation within the RAB model to attract investors.
- Ofgem is considered an appropriate body to regulate the RAB model in the context of nuclear power financing.
- The RAB model aims to reduce financial risks and costs associated with nuclear projects.
- Lessons learned from Hinkley Point C can lead to a 20% cost reduction for subsequent units like Sizewell C.
- Proven technology is used in SMR designs, leveraging existing expertise and manufacturing capabilities.
- Current UK nuclear power stations, excluding Sizewell B, will be offline by 2030.
- There is an increasing demand for electricity in the UK.
- The first SMR is scheduled to operate by 2031.
- All new plants must go through the generic design assessment process.
- The GDA process will take three and a half to four years followed by another 18 months for step 3.
- Engineers from Hinkley C will start demobilising in 12 months, with three quarters of workforce demobilised over one to two and a half years.
- Without RAB nuclear financing model, UK would depend on imported technologies financed overseas.
- The UK's nuclear industry has historical significance in global nuclear technology.
- There is concern over securing control of electricity generation to avoid dependency on other nations for energy supply.
- Legislative support for a robust financing model for nuclear projects, such as the RAB model, is crucial.
- Yvonne Fovargue is chairing the examination of witnesses.
- Tom Thackeray is from the Confederation of British Industry, Programme Director for Decarbonisation.
- Tom Greatrex is CEO of the Nuclear Industry Association.
- Rebecca Groundwater represents Energy Industries Council as Director of External Relations.
- Chinese General Nuclear is a minority financial shareholder in Sizewell C.
- The UK government has allocated £1.7 billion for pre-development works at Sizewell C.
- The Nuclear Industry Association (NIA) seeks more detail on how the funding will be utilised.
- Yvonne Fovargue asks questions about clause 1 of the Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill.
- The query pertains to the designation of a nuclear company and the clarity provided in the Bill regarding this process.
- The Climate Change Committee's balance pathway scenario suggests a need for 10 GW total nuclear capacity by 2035.
- The supply chain is ready with people, skills, and capability but needs stability and clear pipeline of opportunities.
- Development of an objective finance taxonomy for infrastructure contributing to low-carbon future and net zero is ongoing.
- Mycle Schneider is an independent analyst based in Paris who coordinates the annual World Nuclear Industry Status Report.
- Professor Stephen Thomas is emeritus professor of energy policy at the University of Greenwich with over 40 years of experience as an independent energy policy analyst.
- Doug Parr is the policy director and chief scientist at Greenpeace UK.
- Mycle Schneider states that solar and wind energy costs are about a quarter of those for nuclear.
- National Grid scenarios indicate Sizewell C is only required in one scenario out of three to reach net zero by 2050.
- Professor Thomas argues that nuclear power lacks flexibility, unlike renewables which can be complemented with batteries or demand-side response.
- The V.C. Summer plant project was abandoned in July 2017 due to cost overruns and Westinghouse's bankruptcy.
- Construction of the V.C. Summer nuclear plants started in 2013, with an original completion date set for 2017 but costs increased by 75%.
- Jeffrey A. Benjamin, former senior vice-president at Westinghouse, was charged with felony counts including conspiracy and wire fraud.
- The Dungeness B plant in Britain took 24 years to complete from start of construction to commercial operation.
- Yvonne Fovargue reminds participants to stay within the scope of the Bill.
- The debate involves discussions on firm power requirements and the need for baseload power.
- Doug Parr argues for the rapid deployment of renewables and greater interconnection with the continent as alternatives to nuclear energy.
- Professor Thomas supports energy efficiency measures over expensive new power sources like nuclear.
- The Bill is designed to facilitate primarily Sizewell C.
- £1.7 billion allocated in the Budget for nuclear projects, likely aimed at enabling a final investment decision for Sizewell C.
- CGN’s involvement in UK projects includes Hinkley Point C, Sizwell B/C and Bradwell B.
- The RAB funding mechanism could see bill payers paying for an asset before it generates electricity.
- Decommissioning funds have historically failed multiple times in the UK.
- The Committee meets again on Thursday 18 November at half-past Eleven o'clock.
- No further questions from Members were raised after Doug Parr's comments.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy