<-- Back to proposed bills
Judicial Review and Courts Bill - Sitting 8 (Afternoon)
16 November 2021
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement discusses amendments to clause 18 of the Judicial Review and Courts Bill, addressing options for participation in court hearings via non-electronic means. The statement discusses the provisions of the Judicial Review and Courts Bill, particularly regarding the option for individuals to request a physical or in-person hearing instead of electronic means. The statement discusses the implications and benefits of moving court proceedings to a digital format under the Judicial Review and Courts Bill. The statement discusses provisions in the Judicial Review and Courts Bill regarding online procedures for civil, family, or tribunal proceedings. Mark Hendrick is proposing amendments to Clause 21 of the Judicial Review and Courts Bill to expand the membership of the Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC) by including various stakeholders. The statement addresses concerns about the composition and expertise of the online procedure rule committee proposed by the Judicial Review and Courts Bill. The amendments address the membership and appointment requirements of the new online procedure rule committee. Mark Hendrick is discussing amendments to the Judicial Review and Courts Bill regarding the affirmative resolution procedure and concurrence requirement for various rules and regulations. The statement addresses concerns about the extensive powers granted to the Lord Chancellor under the Judicial Review and Courts Bill, particularly regarding clauses 25 and 26. The statement addresses amendments to the Judicial Review and Courts Bill related to the Lord Chancellor's powers over online procedure rules committees. Mark Hendrick is discussing Clause 27 of the Judicial Review and Courts Bill which includes a duty to provide support for individuals who need it. Mark Hendrick is discussing the progression of clauses related to judicial review and courts legislation.
Action Requested
Amendment 90 would ensure that if someone has a physical or mental condition preventing them from understanding or effectively participating in online proceedings, the Online Procedure Rules must allow them to participate by non-electronic means. The amendment aims to protect access to justice for individuals with vulnerabilities or particular conditions.
Key Facts
- Amendment 59 allows a person to choose to participate in a hearing by non-electronic means.
- Amendment 90 ensures that the Online Procedure Rules must allow participation by non-electronic means if a physical or mental health assessment confirms it is necessary.
- Clause 18(6) and (7) provide provisions for opting out of electronic participation in certain circumstances.
- The Bill allows individuals to request a physical or in-person hearing if represented.
- HMCTS provides support over the phone and face-to-face for those who might require it.
- A national contract has been awarded to deliver support across civil, family, and tribunal jurisdictions.
- Support services include local-centre support at more than 300 sites, over-the-phone support, remote video appointments, and in-home face-to-face support.
- During the initial part of the pandemic, 90% of court and tribunal hearings used remote technology.
- A virtual region of fee-paid judges has been established to hear cases anywhere within the jurisdiction online.
- The proposals stem from Lord Briggs’s review in 2016 recommending an online court with a new rule committee.
- Clause 19 enables regulations by the Lord Chancellor regarding specified proceedings for online procedures.
- Clause 20 allows provision for circumstances where a party may choose whether to use an online procedure or alternative civil/family court procedure.
- Regulations require concurrence from the Lord Chief Justice and, for tribunals, the Senior President of Tribunals.
- Amendment 60 requires the Lord Chief Justice to appoint an authorised court and tribunal staff member.
- Amendment 61 expands OPRC membership to include two IT experts.
- Amendment 29 mandates a person with experience in Scottish legal system appointed by the Lord President of the Court of Session.
- Amendment 62 includes someone representing digitally excluded people's views.
- Amendment 91 requires appointment of a person with expertise in accessible service design.
- Amendment 64 demands consideration of ethnic and gender balance when making OPRC appointments.
- Clause 21 sets out the membership of the online procedure rule committee with six members.
- Three judicial appointments are made by the Lord Chief Justice and three by the Lord Chancellor.
- Richard Leiper's evidence highlights concerns about the limited scope of experience in the current composition.
- Amendment 60 proposes adding an authorised courts and tribunals staff member to the OPRC.
- Amendment 61 suggests including two IT experts instead of one.
- Amendment 62 aims to include someone with expertise representing digitally excluded people.
- Amendment 91 would require appointing a person with experience in accessible service design.
- Amendment 64 proposes considering ethnic and gender balance in appointments.
- Amendments relate to membership and appointments of the new online procedure rule committee.
- The committee consists of six members: three judicial and three non-judicial members.
- Amendment 63 proposes consultation with the Lord Chancellor and agreement from the Senior President for staff member appointments.
- Amendment 92 aims to make regulations under clause 23 subject to the affirmative resolution procedure.
- Amendment 65 would make the Lord Chancellor’s power to require rules from the Online Procedure Rules Committee subject to concurrence requirement.
- Amendments include changes to clauses 24, 25, 26, and 30 for similar procedural requirements.
- Clause 25 allows the Lord Chancellor to require Online Procedure Rules to be made.
- Clause 26 grants broad powers for the Lord Chancellor to amend or repeal enactments to facilitate online procedures.
- Clauses 19 and 20 are subject to concurrence requirements with the Lord Chief Justice or Senior President of Tribunals.
- The amendments relate to changing membership of rule committees and consultation procedures.
- Regulations must be agreed by Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals before being laid before Parliament.
- Clause 26 provides for consequential or minor amendments to legislation to facilitate online procedure rules.
- Clause 27 of the Judicial Review and Courts Bill includes a duty to make support available for individuals who require it.
- The clause aims to provide assistance to people using online procedures, ensuring they have the necessary resources and guidance.
- Clause 29 and Schedule 4 are being discussed together.
- Schedule 4 amends existing legislation to provide clarity regarding which set of rules apply to specific cases.
- The Lord Chancellor must obtain agreement from the Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals for certain regulations.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy