<-- Back to proposed bills
Written evidence reported to the House - Sitting 4
23 September 2021
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
Rossella Pagliuchi-Lor from UNHCR expresses concerns about a Bill's compliance with international law and its potential negative impacts on refugees. The statement discusses the impact of resettlement schemes on asylum seekers and refugees, focusing on the UK's Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme (VPRS) and its limitations. MP Siobhain McDonagh is facilitating questions on a parliamentary Bill related to refugee policies. Siobhain McDonagh concludes the Committee's questioning session and introduces new witnesses to discuss modern slavery provisions in a Bill. The statement discusses concerns about the Modern Slavery Bill's compliance with international human rights law, particularly regarding protections for child victims of trafficking. The statement discusses concerns regarding changes to the threshold for identifying victims of modern slavery and human trafficking, and the potential impact on timely identification and support for victims. Siobhain McDonagh addresses concerns regarding the proposals in the Bill to reduce the recovery period for victims of trafficking. The statement addresses concerns about clauses in a Bill that may contradict international law and human rights conventions, particularly regarding trafficking victims and the National Referral Mechanism (NRM). The statement discusses concerns and challenges related to human trafficking, particularly focusing on missing children and unaccompanied asylum-seeking children in the UK. The statement discusses the Asylum and Immigration Bill and its impact on asylum seekers in the UK. The statement discusses concerns about the treatment of refugees under proposed asylum legislation. Siobhain McDonagh is addressing concerns about asylum accommodation and the proposed Bill's impact on refugees. Siobhain McDonagh is discussing the costs and implications of prosecuting and imprisoning those seeking asylum under a proposed Bill. Siobhain McDonagh intervenes to allow Neil Coyle to ask a question about safe routes for refugees entering the UK. The statement discusses the creation and expansion of safe routes for refugees and asylum seekers, including resettlement programmes and family reunion policies. Patricia Durr expresses concerns about the impact of part 4 of the Bill on child victims of trafficking, particularly British national children and unaccompanied minors. The statement discusses the implications of a Bill that proposes to amend safeguards for preventing childhood statelessness in the UK. The statement discusses the potential criminalization of irregular entry into the UK and its impact on asylum seekers' ability to claim refugee status. The statement discusses concerns regarding amendments to asylum appeals processes, wasted costs orders, maritime enforcement measures, and interpretations of the Refugee Convention. The statement addresses concerns about changes proposed in a Bill related to refugee assessments and definitions of 'particular social group', arguing these changes undermine existing legal interpretations and international obligations. The statement addresses concerns about clause 9 in the Bill, which affects stateless children's ability to acquire British citizenship.
Action Requested
Pagliuchi-Lor requests that the committee consider the bill's non-compliance with the 1951 refugee convention, potential exacerbation of existing issues, and the significant suffering it may cause to refugees who are seeking asylum in the UK. She also advises looking at the issue in a broader global context.
Key Facts
- UNHCR has published two sets of opinions on the policy document and the Bill.
- The Bill contravenes the UK’s obligations under the 1951 refugee convention.
- Refugees will face up to four years in jail for unauthorised arrival or presence.
- Refugees may be kept in a precarious situation for up to 10 years with no access to public welfare unless destitute.
- The UK receives around 35,000 asylum seekers per year, compared to over 4 million refugees in Turkey.
- The UK's Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme (VPRS) has closed.
- VPRS resettled only a fraction of 1% of the refugees in need annually.
- Middle-class individuals can also become refugees due to economic hardships and lack of resources.
- The UK was part of the Dublin scheme, a mechanism allowing states to share responsibility for assessing asylum seekers.
- About 4,500 individuals have been notified of their possible inadmissibility since changes to initial rules were implemented.
- Seven individuals have been found inadmissible but no one has been returned under this system.
- The UNHCR is the established guardian of the 1951 Refugee Convention.
- Siobhain McDonagh concludes the Committee's questioning session.
- Siobhán Mullally, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Trafficking in Persons, is introduced.
- Dame Sara Thornton, Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner for the UK, is introduced.
- Nearly half of potential victims referred into the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) in 2020 were children.
- Clauses 46 to 51 are seen as not complying with international human rights law.
- There is only one mention of children in part 4 on modern slavery.
- The Bill suggests using reasonable grounds as a threshold for identifying victims of modern slavery.
- Clauses 46 and 47 pose difficulties in terms of international human rights law compliance.
- Victims may experience trauma that affects their ability to disclose information timely.
- Siobhain McDonagh addresses concerns regarding the Bill's proposal to reduce the recovery period for victims of trafficking.
- The MP is open to further questions on the matter.
- She raises concerns about insufficient consultation with survivor groups.
- The equality impact assessment published last week mentions exemptions for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children.
- Cases L.E. v. Greece, S.M. v. Croatia, V.C.L. and A.N. v. the United Kingdom are cited as relevant to clause 51 of the Bill.
- Siobhán Mullally states that part 4 of the Bill is not in compliance with international law, ECHR, Council of Europe’s convention on trafficking, or UN Palermo protocol.
- Concerns raised about increased numbers of referrals into the NRM, doubling over three or four years.
- Difficulty in decision-making due to lack of complete information from local authorities, police forces, or Border Force.
- Proposal to consider specially trained points of contact for dealing with trafficking cases instead of expecting all officers and staff to handle them.
- The Bill is seen as punitive rather than protective.
- Research shows that deterrents do not prevent people from seeking safety in the UK.
- The legislation may force asylum seekers to take more dangerous routes and rely on smugglers.
- Women and victims of gender-based violence are particularly affected by the lack of safe routes.
- The government has committed to taking in 20,000 refugees from Afghanistan over two years.
- Women who experience sexual and gender-based violence face barriers in disclosing such experiences due to shame, stigma, and fear of reprisals.
- Agnes, a refugee from a west African country, was detained after her initial asylum claim was refused and had to lodge a fresh claim.
- Asylum accommodation has been in crisis for years.
- Five clients have had ceiling collapses in their homes.
- People are living in one room or hotels for extended periods.
- The Bill allows the Home Secretary to extend stay in accommodation centres beyond six months.
- Legislation permits residence conditions that could lead to de facto detention.
- The proposed Bill could cost up to £400 million a year more than the current system.
- There is an existing asylum decision backlog of 70,000 people.
- A faster and efficient decision-making process would help in reducing the backlog.
- Mariam Kemple-Hardy discusses the impact of the asylum system on mental health.
- Refugees face a £5.69 daily allowance, leading to state-sponsored poverty.
- Allowing refugees the right to work could save the Home Office about £100 million per year.
- The Government previously took in 5,000 Syrian refugees per year.
- The speaker advocates for resettling 10,000 refugees from around the world annually.
- Refugee family reunion is used by tens of thousands of people, mainly women and children.
- Child victims of trafficking, including British national children, form the majority of those referred into the national referral mechanism.
- There was a nearly 10% increase in children being identified as potential victims of trafficking last year.
- Criminal exploitation is the most commonly reported form of modern slavery for potential child victims.
- Clause 9 restricts children’s ability to access safeguards and acquire British citizenship.
- The UK has international obligations in preventing childhood statelessness.
- Stateless children in the UK are mainly from recognised stateless communities or are in care with migrant backgrounds.
- Clause 9 applies to children born in the UK who have lived here for at least five years.
- The Home Office gives itself maritime enforcement powers under schedule 3.
- Clauses 37 and 38 criminalize arrival and assisting arrival in the UK, impacting asylum seekers.
- Clause 12 prohibits claiming asylum in UK territorial waters.
- Priority removal notices restrict appeals to upper tribunal only.
- Expedited appeal system lacks onward appeal rights to Court of Appeal or Supreme Court.
- Maritime enforcement provisions conflict with UN Convention on the Law of the Sea's duty of rescue.
- Clause 38 removes 'for profit' from legislation affecting search-and-rescue operations.
- The Bill seeks to change the standard of proof from 'reasonable chance' to 'balance of probability'.
- It proposes revising the definition of 'particular social group', making tests cumulative rather than alternative.
- Adrian Berry argues that opening safe and legal routes for asylum seekers is necessary to end smuggling routes.
- Clause 9 of the Bill is criticized for creating barriers for stateless children seeking British nationality.
- Paragraph 3 of schedule 2 to the British Nationality Act 1981 complies with international law.
- The consultation period was deemed insufficient and there were concerns about the inclusion of part 4 provisions in the asylum and immigration Bill.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy