<-- Back to proposed bills
Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill - Sitting 10
20 September 2021
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
Michelle Donelan discusses the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill's clause aimed at strengthening the Office for Students' role in promoting freedom of speech and academic freedom. The statement discusses the proposed amendment to require higher education providers to report annually on events cancelled due to complaints about speakers' opinions. The statement discusses the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill and its focus on addressing the chilling effect in universities beyond no-platforming incidents. The statement addresses the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill and discusses Clause 5 which amends the Higher Education and Research Act 2017 to establish new mandatory registration conditions for higher education providers to ensure freedom of speech and academic freedom. The statement discusses concerns about the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill's impact on smaller educational institutions and student unions. The statement discusses the proposed Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill and the process for setting monetary penalties for student unions that breach their duty to protect freedom of speech. The statement discusses the process for drafting regulations related to penalties under the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill and addresses concerns about the adequacy of consultation and timing. The statement addresses the extension of freedom of speech duties to student unions and approved fee cap providers under the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill. The statement addresses concerns about the regulation of student unions under the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill. The minister is discussing amendments related to a complaints scheme for higher education providers and their constituent institutions under the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill. The statement addresses amendments to the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill concerning eligibility for complaints under the Office for Students (OfS) scheme. The statement discusses the inclusion of a time limit for complaints under the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill.
Action Requested
The clause amends the Higher Education and Research Act 2017 to include new duties for the OfS to promote freedom of speech and academic freedom, and introduces section 69A requiring the OfS to report on these matters. It is intended to change campus culture to support a thriving environment for free speech.
Key Facts
- The Office for Students (OfS) regulates higher education in England.
- Clause amends duties of OfS under the Higher Education and Research Act 2017.
- Section 69A mandates OfS to report on freedom of speech and academic freedom.
- The amendment seeks annual reporting on events cancelled following complaints about speakers' opinions.
- Reporting must be careful not to duplicate existing requirements under section 8 of the Higher Education and Research Act 2017.
- Under registration condition F3, all registered providers are required to provide information to the OfS.
- The OfS is required to provide information and cooperate with monitoring or investigations as requested.
- Professor Kaufmann's evidence suggests no-platforming incidents are minimal (just a handful among some 10,000 events).
- Witnesses testified about the chilling effect of self-censorship in universities.
- Clause 5 amends the Higher Education and Research Act 2017.
- Proposed new section 8A requires institutions to ensure governing documents uphold freedom of speech duties.
- Institutions must also comply with duties under sections A1 to A3 as inserted by clause 1 of the Bill.
- The Office of the Independent Adjudicator's membership has increased from 150 providers in 2014 to almost 800 providers in 2021.
- Amendment 77 would introduce an upper limit on fines for breaches under the Bill.
- There is a concern that the one-size-fits-all fining system could disproportionately impact smaller student unions with fewer resources.
- The amendment proposes setting a maximum monetary penalty for student unions by the Office for Students following consultation.
- The current Bill allows the Secretary of State to set regulations for penalties subject to parliamentary scrutiny.
- Previous legislation, section 15 of the Higher Education and Research Act 2017, also sets out monetary penalties imposed on higher education providers.
- The process is in line with section 15 of the 2017 Act.
- Careful consideration will be given to the status and financial position of student unions, as well as their varying sizes when setting penalties.
- Regulations will provide provisions about matters to which the OfS must or must not have regard when imposing penalties.
- Clause 6 extends regulatory functions of the Office for Students under the Higher Education and Research Act 2017.
- New section 69B allows the OfS to impose monetary penalties on non-compliant student unions.
- The clause requires student unions to provide information to the OfS as part of its monitoring duties.
- The Bill will regulate student unions on freedom of speech matters.
- Charity law will still apply to registered charities.
- There is concern that the regulation may lead to contradictory decisions between the OfS and the Charity Commission.
- Amendments made include inserting “, their constituent institutions” after “providers” on page 7 line 41.
- Amendment 9 proposes inserting “or of a constituent institution of such a provider” on page 8 line 15.
- The amendments are designed to secure that the free speech complaints scheme applies consistently across all relevant entities.
- Amendment 35 would restrict eligibility for complaints to current members or staff of a higher education provider.
- Amendments 36 and 37 propose imposing a five-year time limit on who may bring a complaint to the OfS scheme.
- The OIA only considers complaints made within 12 months of a final decision by a higher education provider.
- There is no time limit specified in the Bill.
- The OfS will set an appropriate time limit based on consultations with stakeholders.
- Amendment 35 would restrict complaints to current members only, thus it will not be included.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy