<-- Back to proposed bills

Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill - Sitting 6

15 September 2021

Proposing MP
Congleton
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement addresses the protection of academic freedom for students in higher education institutions. Fiona Bruce discusses the importance of including students in the definition of academic freedom within the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill. The statement discusses the distinction between academic freedom for doctoral students and undergraduate students, highlighting that doctoral students have earned special status due to their research contributions. Fiona Bruce is discussing the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill and questioning whether freedom of speech protections under the bill would cover a situation involving a midwifery student who faced academic repercussions. The statement discusses amendments to the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill aimed at expanding protections for academic freedom. John Hayes is discussing the tension between university management and academic staff regarding freedom of speech and academic integrity. The statement discusses concerns about the financial constraints affecting universities' course offerings and the impact on academic freedom. The statement discusses amendments to the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill aimed at protecting academic freedom, particularly in relation to innovative research and preventing institutional punishment for academic views. The statement discusses the issue of defining academic freedom within higher education institutions, particularly focusing on the removal of 'within their field of expertise' from the Bill to ensure broader academic freedom. Fiona Bruce discusses amendments aimed at protecting and promoting academic freedom under the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill. Fiona Bruce discusses amendments to the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill aimed at securing academic freedom and protecting the right to express non-mainstream viewpoints. MP John Martin McDonnell discusses amendments to provide enhanced employment protection for academics, focusing on freedom of speech and academic freedom. The statement addresses amendments to the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill regarding the definition and scope of academic freedom for higher education staff. The statement addresses the scope of academic freedom in the context of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill and clarifies its application to academic staff rather than students. The amendments aim to clarify and limit the scope of academic freedom by excluding individuals or bodies that deny genocide. The speaker discusses an amendment aimed at explicitly excluding holocaust denial and other genocides recognized by the UK Government from legal protections for academic freedom. The statement addresses concerns about genocide denial in higher education institutions and proposes exemptions for such speech under the Bill. The statement does not address a specific policy or issue directly but rather involves declarations of interests by MPs related to their connections with higher education institutions.

Action Requested

Fiona Bruce proposes amending the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill to include students alongside staff, ensuring that academic freedom applies to both groups. She highlights concerns about self-censorship among students and provides examples of instances where students face pressure or consequences for expressing unpopular views.

Key Facts

  • Amendment 59 seeks to insert “and students” after “staff” in clause 1, page 2, line 9.
  • Witnesses testified that academic freedom should protect both staff and students due to the vulnerability of students to self-censorship.
  • Professor Biggar mentioned a case where a junior research fellow was pressured not to be photographed or named at an event due to fear of repercussions for their career.
  • Julia Rynkiewicz, a Catholic midwifery student, faced suspension and investigation after leading a pro-life group.
  • Professors Goodwin and Kaufmann stated that 25% of UK university students self-censor.
  • Fiona Bruce raised concerns over the potential exclusion of students under the Bill's definition.
  • Professor Biggar and a midwifery student were cited as examples to support her argument for including students in the protection of academic freedom.
  • Matt Western argued that conferring academic freedom status on new students might not be appropriate due to their lack of experience and academic rigour.
  • Doctoral students have considerable expertise and might be tutoring undergraduates.
  • Academic freedom should be conferred based on peer-reviewed research rather than just being present on campus.
  • Amendment 44 includes the words “and in the conduct of research” to close a loophole for doctoral students.
  • The Bill seeks to extend academic freedom protections to academic staff.
  • Academic freedom under the Bill includes promotion and new applicants for positions.
  • Honorary positions, paid or unpaid, are covered under the provisions of academic freedom.
  • Freedom of speech would cover students in various scenarios.
  • Amendment aims to clarify distinctions between freedom of speech and academic freedom.
  • Academic freedom is rooted in university education principles like innovation, intellectual curiosity, and creativity.
  • Witnesses testified that many academics feel unwelcome or restricted from expressing their views.
  • Proposed amendment includes freedoms to question received wisdom, put forward new ideas, and express opinions about the institution's governance.
  • The amendment seeks to defend the integrity of academics at the 'coalface'.
  • There is concern about top-down pressure from university management on academics.
  • University governance and accountability are issues for consideration after passing this Bill.
  • Universities are making decisions to drop courses due to financial constraints.
  • There is a debate about whether universities should be motivated by utilitarian purposes or broader societal benefits.
  • The UNESCO definition of academic freedom includes five parts, including freedom from institutional censorship and the ability to express opinions about the institution.
  • Amendment 47 aims to protect academics from institutional penalties related to their work at other institutions.
  • Amendment 48 seeks to prevent universities from denying training opportunities as a form of punishment for an academic's views.
  • Amendment 60 is about including adverse impacts on educational progress, though the speaker expresses reservations about it.
  • Emma Hardy proposes an amendment to remove 'within their field of expertise' from the Bill.
  • Professor Nigel Biggar's comments on defining fields of expertise are referenced.
  • The original definition of academic freedom does not include limitations based on field of expertise.
  • Amendment 27 aims to protect academic freedom.
  • Definition of an academic’s field of expertise could restrict their freedom of expression.
  • Example given: Professor Richard Dawkins critiquing religion despite not being a theologian.
  • Amendment 27 aims to protect academics expressing non-mainstream viewpoints.
  • Professor Matthew Goodwin shared that only 10% of academics supported Brexit when he did.
  • John Finnis, an emeritus professor at Oxford, faced calls for his removal due to traditional Catholic views.
  • David Palmer was denied recognition as a chaplain by Nottingham University over comments on euthanasia and abortion.
  • Professor Kaufmann mentioned there can be over 100 applicants for any academic post.
  • Amendments 45, 46, and 48 seek enhanced protection for academics.
  • Amendment 45 clarifies that the Bill applies to innovative research.
  • Amendment 46 emphasizes freedom from government or institutional interference.
  • Amendment 48 covers career development without discrimination.
  • Amendment 28 aims to remove limitations on academic freedom within a person’s field of expertise.
  • The current provision includes the requirement that protected speech must be lawful and within an individual’s academic field of expertise.
  • The Minister commits to reassessing the need for the ‘field of expertise’ qualification after today's debate.
  • Academic freedom is a subset of freedom of speech.
  • Amendments 60 and 68 seek to extend academic freedom to students, which the minister does not support at this time.
  • The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 already includes protections for external applicants seeking academic posts and career development.
  • Amendment 32 aims to exclude denial of genocide statements from the objective of securing freedom of speech.
  • Amendment 69 defines 'genocide' and 'denial of genocide' under Article II of the UN Convention on Genocide.
  • Amendment 54 ensures that freedom of speech and academic freedom do not cover statements denying genocide.
  • Amendment 34 excludes denial of genocide statements from students’ union duties to secure freedom of speech.
  • The amendment aims to exclude holocaust denial and denial of genocides in Rwanda, Darfur, Cambodia, and Bosnia.
  • Professor Goodwin stated he would invite speakers from extremist organizations like the British National Party or National Front.
  • Nick Griffin has a degree from Cambridge University and has addressed university societies including the Cambridge Union.
  • Government seeks to exempt providers and student unions from securing freedom of speech for those denying genocide.
  • Hololocaust deniers often have links to neo-Nazi extremism, antisemitic violence, and intimidation.
  • The Bill does not give anyone the right to a platform but requires reasonably practicable steps to secure freedom of speech within legal limits.
  • John Hayes is a professor at the University of Bolton.
  • John Martin McDonnell is an honorary fellow of Birkbeck College, and his wife is a tutor at UCL.
  • David Simmonds is an honorary fellow of Birkbeck.
  • Lloyd Russell-Moyle has professional connections with the Universities of Sussex and Bradford.
  • Matt Western's wife works at a higher education provider.
  • Emma Hardy's partner works on the University of Hull’s degree apprenticeship course.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy