<-- Back to proposed bills
Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill - Sitting 3
13 September 2021
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement discusses the importance of academic freedom and its protection within universities, focusing on issues such as no-platforming and self-censorship among academics. The discussion revolves around academic freedom and the impact of ideological biases within universities on students' exposure to diverse viewpoints. The statement addresses concerns about academic freedom and free speech in universities, proposing legislative measures to protect these rights. The statement discusses the implications of exercising academic freedom and the potential loss of posts for some colleagues. Christopher Chope discusses the impact of complaints against academics and the need for strong protections. Christopher Chope is addressing the committee regarding the limited time allocated for expert evidence during the examination of a witness. Sunder Katwala discusses the implications of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill, focusing on the tension between protecting academic freedom and addressing lawful but reprehensible speech. The statement discusses the issue of free speech and academic freedom in British higher education institutions. The MP discusses with Sunder Katwala about who should determine what lawful speech is unacceptable on university campuses, questioning whether it should be the Government or individual universities. Christopher Chope closes the session on the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill after discussions about free speech boundaries in universities. Nicola Dandridge, chief executive of the Office for Students, discusses the proposed Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill and its implications for the Office for Students' relationship with other organizations like the OIA. The statement addresses the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill and its impact on academic freedom and free speech in higher education. Christopher Chope is concluding the questioning session during the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill committee hearing.
Action Requested
No specific action is requested. The speaker emphasizes the need for legislative measures to protect academic freedom and addresses concerns about chilling effects and self-censorship in university environments.
Key Facts
- 35% of UCU members reported feeling restricted in expressing their beliefs, affecting approximately 35,000 academics.
- In a King’s study, 25% of students claimed they would not express what they believe, impacting around 500,000 people.
- Professor Kaufmann and Professor Goodwin testified about the chilling effect on academic freedom due to no-platforming incidents.
- Professor Kaufmann co-authored a Policy Exchange report.
- Only about one in ten academics are willing to support a given cancel campaign.
- Critical race theory is viewed as problematic when mandated in schools due to compelled speech concerns.
- More than half of the allocated time has been used.
- The statement discusses concerns about self-censorship and the chilling effect in universities.
- Christopher Chope interrupts another MP's speech to maintain order.
- Professor Goodwin mentioned that dozens of academics have appeared in newspapers due to accusations and dismissals.
- The University of Bristol removed a course despite ruling that an academic was not Islamophobic.
- Approximately one-quarter of students feel they cannot speak out about particular issues, according to the King’s study.
- Chope mentions cases where academics face suspension and loss of reputation due to student complaints.
- Professors may need medication due to stress from the current academic culture.
- The academic job market is extremely competitive, with many applications per position.
- Christopher Chope is chairing the Public Bill Committee meeting on the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill.
- Sunder Katwala introduces himself as the director of British Future, an independent think-tank and charity.
- The committee has until 4:45 pm to complete its session.
- The bill aims to protect academic freedom expansively.
- There are concerns about defending all forms of lawful speech as academic freedom.
- Examples include holocaust denial, comparing Israel to Nazi Germany, and racially charged remarks.
- Katwala questions the operational detail needed to address material loss or reputational damage in cases of disinvited speakers.
- Seven out of ten people in Britain think political correctness can be a problem if overapplied.
- According to Facebook, 71% of users self-censor.
- Among right-wing academics, the figure for self-censorship is only 32%.
- No clear answer is given about who would arbitrate what lawful speech is prohibited.
- Three categories of speech are identified: directly discriminatory content, advocacy against academic freedom, and extreme conspiracy theories.
- The Government's position on holocaust denial is mentioned as an example.
- The discussion involved risks associated with extreme views and foreign state actors influencing university debates.
- Sunder Katwala expressed concerns about clear frameworks for deciding on cases involving free speech limits.
- The debate addressed potential chilling effects on academic freedom due to financial pressures from foreign states like China.
- Nicola Dandridge is the chief executive of the Office for Students.
- The Office for Students works collaboratively with various organizations including the OIA (Office of the Independent Adjudicator).
- There are concerns about how the director for freedom of speech and academic freedom will be appointed, and whether this should be included in the Bill.
- The Office for Students (OfS) has public interest principles including a duty to protect academic freedom and secure free speech.
- Universities and colleges have governing documents that uphold these public interest principles under registration conditions.
- The Bill proposes significant additional powers in addressing free speech issues compared to current regulatory approaches.
- The session concludes with Christopher Chope's statement.
- No further questions are raised by Christopher Chope.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy