<-- Back to proposed bills
Building Safety Bill - Sitting 1
09 September 2021
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
The statement is about setting the agenda and schedule for a Public Bill Committee meeting regarding the Building Safety Bill. Maria Miller is chairing a Public Bill Committee discussion on the Building Safety Bill. The statement discusses the appropriateness of using building height as a measure for assessing fire risk under the Building Safety Bill. Maria Miller is addressing questions related to the Building Safety Bill and its implications for fire safety and building audits. The statement discusses concerns regarding the Building Safety Bill's scope and its ability to address existing building stock and modern construction methods. The statement discusses concerns about the misuse of EWS1 forms and the need for a risk-based approach to building safety assessments. The statement discusses the Building Safety Bill and its impact on building safety in the UK. Maria Miller discusses concerns about the Building Safety Bill's lack of detail regarding key elements such as the golden thread and gateway process. The discussion centres on the Building Safety Bill's adequacy in protecting leaseholders from unaffordable costs, ensuring industry accountability, improving competence levels, regulating construction products, and the importance of secondary legislation. The statement addresses concerns about the Building Safety Bill, including potential unintended consequences and the need for independent scrutiny of construction work. Maria Miller concludes the evidence session and thanks the witnesses for their participation.
Action Requested
Maria Miller announces that the Committee will follow a set schedule, hear from various witnesses over several days, and proceed through specific clauses of the Bill. She also reminds members to declare any interests related to the building industry.
Key Facts
- The Committee meetings are scheduled for September and October.
- Witnesses include Sir Ken Knight CBE QFSM, Independent Expert Advisory Panel; National Fire Chiefs’ Council.
- Maria Miller declares her interest due to her husband's involvement in a law firm representing clients in the building industry.
- The Building Safety Regulator is central to ensuring capability and competence throughout the sector.
- Dan Daly welcomes the Bill as an important step change but suggests broadening its scope at appropriate points.
- Australia's approach, particularly Victoria’s single regulator model, addresses a much smaller scale of buildings compared to the UK (2,300 vs 12,000 high-rise residential buildings in the UK).
- Sir Ken Knight supports the mixed economy approach proposed by Dame Judith Hackitt but emphasizes the need for a level playing field in terms of competency and assurance.
- Height is currently used to determine the threshold of buildings in scope, with a starting point of 18 metres or more than six floors.
- The Building Safety Regulator has discretion to broaden the scope beyond height-based criteria to include other risk factors such as care homes and hospitals.
- There are concerns about market overreaction leading to undue financial burden on leaseholders.
- The Building Safety Bill aims to improve knowledge of building conditions.
- The Fire Safety Act 2021 grants enforcement authority to fire and rescue services for buildings with multiple occupancies.
- Richmond House in Worcester Park was evacuated due to fire risks, highlighting the need for comprehensive safety measures.
- The Bill allows for secondary legislation to address issues not covered by primary law.
- Buildings with existing planning permission under the current system may still be constructed and need reassessment.
- Modern methods of construction like timber-frame and modular techniques require robust competency measures throughout their lifecycle.
- EWS1 forms have been misused, adding unnecessary costs for leaseholders.
- The Fire Safety Act 2021's external wall assessment will potentially replace EWS1 forms.
- Leaseholders should not bear the cost of historic building defects.
- The Building Safety Bill includes provisions for a new construction products regulator.
- Modern methods of construction bring precision in pre-forming and pre-making, but require built-in fire safety elements.
- The Bill is seen as a step forward from the draft version but not a panacea to ensure building safety.
- The Building Safety Bill's detail is left largely in secondary legislation.
- Key elements like the golden thread and gateway process are not on the face of the Bill.
- Mandatory registration for principal designer, principal contractor, building safety manager roles is needed.
- The Bill extends the Defective Premises Act 1972.
- Housebuilders and developers have put up £500 million already.
- The Grenfell evidence revealed scandalous integrity in marketing information for construction products.
- Implementation of the conformity assessed mark has been postponed by a year.
- Graham Watts expresses concern about the unintended consequences of the Act, particularly regarding the insurability of roles such as building safety managers.
- There is a recommendation for codicils like “so far as reasonably practicable” in certain requirements to prevent uninsurability.
- The importance of independent scrutiny of construction work is highlighted, with a reference to the traditional role of clerks of works and architects supervising site work.
- Maria Miller thanked the witnesses for a 'really excellent evidence session'.
- The session was ordered to be adjourned until later that day.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy