<-- Back to proposed bills

Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill - Sitting 3

08 July 2021

Proposing MP
Neath
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

The statement discusses a proposed new clause that would require the Secretary of State to assess the effectiveness of certain non-domestic rating list provisions. The statement addresses changes to business rates determinations in light of the pandemic, focusing on clarifying that the impact of coronavirus should be reflected in the next general revaluation. Jeff Smith discusses the Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill, highlighting concerns about the adequacy of funding for businesses affected by pandemic restrictions. The statement discusses the Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill, focusing on funding for business rates relief during the pandemic. The statement discusses new clauses that aim to impose reporting obligations on the Secretary of State regarding investigations and disqualifications of former directors from dissolved companies. The statement addresses amendments to the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 to close loopholes for dissolved companies, enabling investigation and disqualification of directors who engage in misconduct. The statement discusses the Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill aimed at closing legal loopholes for unscrupulous directors. The statement discusses the Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill and addresses concerns about reporting requirements and resourcing for enforcement. The speaker discusses clause 2 of the Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill, addressing inconsistencies in current legislation that allow directors to evade disqualification by dissolving companies. The statement addresses the progress and technical aspects of the Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill. The statement discusses the Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Bill.

Action Requested

Christina Rees is proposing that the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament an assessment within one year after the Act's passage, evaluating the effectiveness and interaction of the provisions with other coronavirus support measures and business rates policies.

Key Facts

  • The proposed new clause requires an assessment by the Secretary of State.
  • The assessment must be submitted no later than one year after the Act is passed.
  • The assessment should consider the extent to which the provisions achieve their objectives, their interaction with other laws, and potential related changes.
  • Clause 1 applies to England and aims to ensure that successful MCC appeals cannot be made based on the pandemic or the government's response.
  • The next general revaluation is set for 1 April 2023, based on a valuation date of 1 April 2021.
  • £16 billion package of support for business rates has been provided during the pandemic.
  • New clause 2 would require an assessment of the effectiveness of clause 1's provisions within one year of Royal Assent.
  • The Bill aims to rule out covid-related material change in circumstances claims for business rates appeals.
  • An additional relief fund of £1.5 billion has been announced for businesses not benefiting from existing rates relief.
  • Heathrow Airport had losses exceeding £2 billion, including a business rates bill of £120 million, but received only £8 million in relief.
  • The government has committed an additional £1.5 billion for business rates relief.
  • The existing support package includes £16 billion of relief over two years for retail, hospitality, leisure, and nursery ratepayers affected by the pandemic.
  • Guidance for councils will be published after final discussions with organisations such as LGA, CIPFA, and IRV.
  • The Secretary of State must lay a report before each House of Parliament no later than three months after the Act is passed.
  • Each report includes the number of investigations and disqualifications made by the Insolvency Service in the preceding three-month period.
  • An assessment of the provisions' effectiveness must be laid before Parliament within one year after certain sections come into force.
  • The Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 does not cover dissolved companies, allowing loopholes for misconduct.
  • Clause 2 amends sections of the CDDA to include former directors of dissolved companies within three years of dissolution.
  • Section 8ZA allows disqualification of individuals who exert influence over disqualified directors.
  • Amendments ensure compensation orders or undertakings can be made against former directors of dissolved companies.
  • The Bill aims to close loopholes exploited by unscrupulous directors who dissolve companies to avoid financial responsibilities.
  • Witnesses testified that unscrupulous directors cause significant harm to creditors and may impact employment tribunal awards.
  • New clause 1 would require quarterly reports from the Secretary of State on investigations and disqualifications of directors by the Insolvency Service.
  • Duncan Swift, former president of R3, estimated the Bill could result in up to 15 times more investigations for the Insolvency Service.
  • The Insolvency Service publishes insolvency statistics every three months.
  • Experimental monthly data on insolvencies was added at the start of the pandemic.
  • An annual report covers misconduct allegations and disqualification orders.
  • Enforcement outcomes will include disqualifications against former directors of dissolved companies in future reports.
  • A post-implementation review of the measure will be conducted within five years after commencement.
  • The Insolvency Service prioritises cases where there has been most harm to the public and marketplace.
  • The Insolvency Service has three years to apply for disqualification orders against directors after full liquidation but lacks this power if companies are dissolved without liquidation.
  • A loophole exists allowing directors to dissolve companies to avoid disqualification, which the bill aims to address.
  • Phillip Nunn and Patrick McCreesh have been involved in multiple dissolved companies and are suspected of misconduct involving £46 million in investor losses from Blackmore Bond plc.
  • Companies House documents show young individuals listed as partners in limited liability partnerships.
  • Clause 4 sets out technical aspects including territorial extent, commencement dates, and short title.
  • Business rates measure relating to material changes of circumstances will commence upon passing the Bill.
  • Investigation powers start immediately after passing for suspected serious breaches.
  • Other provisions in clauses 2 and 3 will commence two months post-passage.
  • The Welsh Government intends to include provisions applying to Wales.
  • RDDB04 Philip Clarkson BSc FRICS IRRV, Director—Rating from Lambert Smith Hampton.
  • RDDB05 R3, an insolvency and restructuring trade body.
  • RDDB06 Supplementary evidence provided by the Institute of Revenues, Rating and Valuation (IRRV).
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy