<-- Back to proposed bills
Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill - Sitting 3
20 April 2021
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
Esther McVey is discussing amendments related to renaming the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) to the Advanced Research and Engineering Projects Agency (AREPA). The statement discusses the need for clarity in the purpose and structure of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill. The statement addresses amendments related to the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill, focusing on the name change proposal and the establishment of ARIA as a statutory corporation with its own legal personality. The statement addresses the need for a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between ARIA and UKRI to ensure effective communication and collaboration. The statement addresses amendments to ensure gender balance and diversity on the board of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA). The statement discusses the importance of increasing gender and ethnic diversity on the board of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA). The speaker discusses concerns about diversity within the proposed Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) and proposes an amendment to ensure diversity on the board. Chi Onwurah discusses the importance of diversity within the proposed Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) and questions how this will be ensured without specific mission goals or diversity requirements. The statement discusses the importance of diversity, particularly gender diversity, in the appointments for the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA). The statement addresses the importance of diversity and inclusion in the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA), particularly regarding gender representation on its board. The statement discusses concerns over the oversight and accountability mechanisms for the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) Bill, particularly regarding the appointment of ARIA's first CEO. The statement addresses concerns raised by the Opposition regarding accountability and scrutiny of ARIA, particularly in relation to appointments and transparency. The MP is addressing concerns about the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) Bill, specifically regarding the potential for cronyism and lack of public scrutiny in the appointments process. Amanda Solloway is discussing the process for appointing the CEO and chair of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA). The statement is about concluding the session due to time constraints.
Action Requested
The amendments propose changing the name of ARIA to AREPA in various sections of the Bill, including the title and clauses where ARIA is mentioned.
Key Facts
- Amendment 2 proposes renaming 'Advanced Research and Invention Agency' to 'Advanced Research and Engineering Projects Agency'.
- Amendments 3 and 4 are proposed to reflect the name change in clause 1.
- Amendment 26 modifies the short title in clause 15.
- Amendment 1 changes the long title of the Bill to reflect the new agency name.
- The proposed amendment seeks to rename the agency from Advanced Research and Invention Agency to Advanced Research and Engineering Projects Agency.
- Professor Wilsdon emphasised the need for clarity in governance and purpose to prevent future issues.
- Witnesses like Tabitha Goldstaub highlighted the importance of community-based innovation over individual success.
- Dr Highnam described DARPA's successful project-based model, emphasizing clear missions and independent evaluation.
- The Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) will be established as a statutory corporation.
- Amendment 5 proposes a memorandum of understanding between ARIA and UK Research and Innovation to avoid overlap.
- Amendment 6 suggests including the Chief Executive Officer of UK Research and Innovation as a non-executive member of ARIA.
- Professor Dame Ottoline Leyser from UKRI stated the importance of communication and personal relationships between key players in the research landscape.
- The framework document agreed between BEIS and ARIA will outline broad principles for interaction with other public R&D funders, including UKRI.
- The Minister argues against over-engineering governance arrangements that could create a bureaucratic process.
- Amendment 9 would require the Secretary of State to have regard to diversity in appointments.
- 'Protected characteristics' refers to those defined under Part 2, Chapter 1 of the Equalities Act 2010.
- Only 12% of all engineers are women.
- 25% of 16 to 18-year-old girls would consider becoming an engineer compared to 51.9% of boys.
- Aberdeen has the highest percentage of non-UK-born citizens outside London.
- Only 7% of managers, directors and senior officials in academic and non-academic higher education positions are black, Asian or minority ethnic.
- Only 24% of the UK STEM workforce are women.
- Black and minority ethnic men are 28% less likely to work in STEM than white men.
- Women represent 9% of people in non-medical STEM careers.
- The UK faces a shortfall of 173,000 STEM workers estimated to cost the sector £1.5 billion annually.
- Chi Onwurah acknowledges the work of previous Chair of the Science and Technology Committee.
- Professor Leyser, UKRI CEO, highlighted the importance of having the right mix of people, skills, and career pathways in the science establishment.
- Dr Dugan from Wellcome notes that specificity of goal and outcome is a good way to increase diversity in idea assessment.
- ARIA will be subject to the public sector equality duty.
- The Equality Act 2010 includes protected characteristics such as sex and gender reassignment.
- Appointments made by the Secretary of State will follow the governance code for public appointments which emphasises diversity.
- Amendment 31 requires both Houses of Parliament to approve the appointment of ARIA's first chair.
- Amendment 32 is consequential to Amendment 31 and modifies clause 4.
- Amendment 33 requires parliamentary approval for the appointment of ARIA's CEO and prevents ARIA from exercising functions or receiving grants until a CEO is appointed.
- Amendment 34 is consequential to Amendment 33 and modifies clause 4.
- The recruitment of ARIA's first CEO is already underway.
- No interim CEO will be appointed.
- The amendment seeks to ensure parliamentary oversight over the choice of CEO.
- £800 million of taxpayers' money will be managed by ARIA.
- Kate Bingham’s appointment was referenced.
- £670,000 spent on a campaign to engage hard-to-reach groups in vaccine trials.
- Dominic Cummings refused to give evidence to the Science and Technology Committee.
- Chi Onwurah is responding to interventions about UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) being criticised as inadequate.
- Concerns are raised about ARIA potentially becoming mired in cronyism without proper safeguards.
- Dame Ottoline Leyser from UKRI stresses the importance of waiting until finding the right people for leadership roles.
- Professor James Wilsdon argues that identifying the right leaders is problematic if the mission lacks clarity.
- There is no precedent for requiring parliamentary consent before appointing ARIA's leadership.
- An experienced expert panel including Sir Patrick Vallance and Jo Shanmugalingam will be responsible for candidate interviews.
- Two additional highly esteemed panellists from the international R&D community will join the selection process.
- The session will be adjourned until two o'clock on the same day.
- There are only two minutes left in the current session.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy