<-- Back to proposed bills

Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill - Sitting 2

14 April 2021

Proposing MP
Bradford South
Type
Public Bill Committee

At a Glance

Issue Summary

Judith Cummins introduces witnesses for an evidence session on the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill, focusing on oversight and cultural norms of innovation agencies like DARPA. The discussion revolves around the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill, focusing on issues such as diversity in recruitment, programme management practices, and the creation of Wellcome Leap. The statement discusses the lack of a defined mission for the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) Bill and its potential impact on achieving specific goals. Judith Cummins is chairing a discussion on the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill, focusing on the transition of breakthroughs from research to impact and the importance of programme managers in this process. The MP is discussing the importance of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) remaining autonomous and exploring various funding mechanisms. The discussion centres on the creation and implementation of an Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) model in the UK, drawing comparisons with existing models such as ARPA-E and DARPA. Judith Cummins introduces witnesses for questioning on the purpose and role of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA). The discussion revolves around the focus and approach for the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) in terms of its research areas, funding mechanisms, and decision-making process. The discussion focuses on the establishment and operational independence of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) and its role in funding high-risk research. The MPs are discussing the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) Bill, focusing on its transparency requirements and initial funding. The speaker discusses measuring success in early research phases and the challenges of commercializing research without stifling innovation. Judith Cummins (Bradford South) closes the Committee session by thanking the panel for their evidence. Judith Cummins announces that the sitting is temporarily suspended due to a division in the House. The session discusses the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill, focusing on funding provisions, research focus, international collaboration, and expected returns. The discussion revolves around the need for a long-term vision and cultural change within the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) to support disruptive innovation and attract top talent. MPs discuss the challenges and opportunities of establishing an Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) in the UK. Judith Cummins introduces witnesses David Cleevely and Dr Bob Sorrell to provide evidence on the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill. The statement discusses the potential creation of ARIA (Advanced Research and Invention Agency) and its role in addressing innovation challenges, particularly emphasizing the importance of procurement and market pull for successful technology development. The discussion centres around establishing a new agency like ARIA that can effectively address specific challenges such as climate change or defence technology, emphasizing the importance of setting clear priorities and embracing an understanding of failure. Judith Cummins discusses the importance of shaping the agenda for the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) through partnership between industry, government, and academia. Judith Cummins concludes the session by thanking the witnesses and announcing the next meeting time for the Committee to continue line-by-line consideration of the Bill.

Action Requested

No specific action is requested. The statement is informational, addressing concerns about oversight, conflict of interest rules, and the culture of integrity at innovation-focused agencies.

Key Facts

  • Dr Peter Highnam, deputy director at US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), testified.
  • Professor Pierre Azoulay from Massachusetts Institute of Technology provided evidence.
  • Dr Regina E. Dugan, CEO of Wellcome Leap, was present to give testimony.
  • Dr Peter Highnam explains that projects at DARPA are well-defined with clear metrics, independent evaluations, and regular assessments.
  • Heilmeier questions are used to make the case for starting a project and include five critical questions that assess feasibility and impact.
  • Wellcome Leap was created in 2018 by the Wellcome Trust to address an innovation gap characterized by larger programmes with higher risk tolerance.
  • DARPA's mission is to create and prevent strategic surprise related to national defence.
  • ARPA-E has a high-level mission to overcome technological barriers in energy development.
  • ARIA currently lacks a defined mission compared to other ARPA models.
  • Breakthroughs require significant effort to transition from their originating organization to impact.
  • DARPA has a single customer for its projects, while ARPA-E faces a more diverse ecosystem with multiple actors.
  • ARIA should create tech-to-market groups to facilitate the translation of breakthroughs into practical applications.
  • Dr Dugan emphasizes the necessity of ARIA remaining independent to achieve specific outcomes.
  • DARPA operates with about 0.5% of the US Department of Defense (DOD) budget.
  • Wellcome Leap built a health breakthrough network with almost 30 signatories on six continents.
  • Professor Azoulay agrees with previous comments about the effectiveness of ARPA models but highlights that replicating them depends on context.
  • Dr Highnam notes only one complete replication of DARPA exists within US intelligence agencies.
  • Dr Dugan uses an analogy comparing setting up ARIA to a football team led by a coach like Guardiola, emphasizing principles and practices.
  • Wellcome Leap prioritizes independence, experienced leadership, and freedom from profit motives in its operations.
  • Intellectual property is typically owned by the creator but may have government rights for national security purposes.
  • Judith Cummins introduces Professor Dame Anne Glover and Tabitha Goldstaub.
  • Professor Glover is a molecular biologist with experience as chief scientific adviser for Scotland and the President of the European Commission.
  • Tabitha Goldstaub is co-founder of CognitionX and chair of the UK Government’s AI Council.
  • Three per cent of all peer-reviewed journals are now AI-related.
  • There has been a 50% year-on-year increase in biology and AI collaboration papers since 2000.
  • Demis Hassabis aims for DeepMind's projects to win Nobel prizes.
  • The witnesses recommend ARIA should be independent but have good relationships with central and local governments.
  • Anne Glover suggests that ARIA needs inspirational leaders who are open-minded and credible.
  • Tabitha Goldstaub mentions the importance of systemic transformation where technology and policy regulation cannot be separated.
  • £800 million allocated for ARIA's initial funding.
  • Professor Glover estimates DARPA’s annual funding is about $3.5 billion or $4 billion.
  • Tabitha Goldstaub suggests ARIA should not be restricted in matching Government funding with private sector funds.
  • European Commission funded three brilliant projects.
  • Scotland’s National Academy (Royal Society of Edinburgh) receives governmental funding but is independent from Government.
  • Transparency can prevent accusations of governmental influence over reports.
  • Judith Cummins closes the session at 15:01:00.
  • The next panel comprises Adrian Smith, president of the Royal Society; Felicity Burch, director of innovation and digital at the CBI; and Professor Sir Jim McDonald from the Royal Academy of Engineering.
  • The Committee has until 4:30 pm to question the new witnesses.
  • The sitting is suspended at 15:46 due to a division in the House.
  • The session will resume at 16:00 (4.9 pm).
  • Judith Cummins apologizes to the witnesses for the delay.
  • The Bill provides a minimum length of time for ARIA’s existence of 10 years.
  • There is no provision for a minimum length of time for funding in the Bill.
  • Collaboration with UK and international bodies is seen as important.
  • Witnesses advocate for a long-term view on funding high-risk research.
  • The value-for-money concept needs to be innovated for disruptive innovation.
  • Projects deemed unsuccessful may still produce valuable outcomes in terms of skills and lessons learned.
  • Long-term vision is essential for building new research capability and supply chains.
  • Adrian Smith mentions that the United States invests around 3% in R&D while Israel invests about 4.7%.
  • There is a discussion on the need for ARIA to have operational independence but also input from stakeholders to define its mission.
  • Felicity Burch advises that businesses will be more willing to second employees to ARIA once it has a clear purpose and established credibility.
  • David Cleevely is a serial entrepreneur with experience in telecoms and biotech.
  • Dr Bob Sorrell chairs the Campaign for Science and Engineering.
  • The session will run for half an hour.
  • Bob Sorrell is the chair of the Campaign for Science and Engineering.
  • ARIA needs to match market demand with research outputs from academia and industry collaboration.
  • Strong public procurement can serve as an initial customer for emerging technologies developed by ARIA.
  • The importance of setting priorities for challenges like climate change or defence technology.
  • Establishing a culture that accepts failure as part of scientific progress.
  • Ensuring robust peer-review processes to prevent pet projects and cronyism.
  • Judith Cummins highlights the need for a partnership between industry, Government and academia.
  • Flexibility in models such as seconding people into ARIA is proposed.
  • Integration of learnings between ARIA and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) should be encouraged.
  • Judith Cummins thanked the witnesses for their evidence.
  • The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday at 9.25 am.
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy