<-- Back to proposed bills
Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill - Sitting 1
14 April 2021
Type
Public Bill Committee
At a Glance
Issue Summary
Esther McVey introduces the first witness session for the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill, addressing procedural matters such as declarations of interest and the schedule for oral evidence. Professor Leyser discusses the purpose and potential impact of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) Bill within the existing UK research and innovation system. The statement discusses the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill, focusing on the role and responsibilities of ARIA in identifying new areas of research. The discussion focuses on the potential for the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) to fund innovative projects and reach new talent beyond established research organisations. Esther McVey (Tatton) chairs a Public Bill Committee meeting discussing the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill. The statement discusses the relationship between UKRI and ARIA in supporting innovation and economic growth through research funding. Esther McVey introduces witnesses for further discussion on the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill. The MPs are questioning witnesses about the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) Bill, focusing on its potential benefits and whether it aligns with the principles outlined in academic literature. The statement discusses the characteristics of an Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) and compares it with existing US agencies like DARPA, focusing on innovation, risk management, and public engagement. Professor Mazzucato clarifies the concept of challenge orientation in relation to the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill, drawing parallels with the NASA model and emphasizing the importance of specific missions. Esther McVey discusses the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill and seeks input on governance and structure. The statement discusses the establishment and governance of ARIA (Advanced Research and Invention Agency) and its alignment with UKRI. The statement discusses the need for clarity and ambition in the formation of a new Advanced Research and Invention Agency, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that it fills a genuine gap in the UK's innovation landscape. Esther McVey (Tatton) provides timing and order for upcoming speakers during a parliamentary session. The speaker discusses the importance of an industrial strategy that focuses on solving problems collaboratively across different sectors, emphasizing the need for clear communication about government policies and their goals. Esther McVey concludes the Public Bill Committee sitting for the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill, addressing remaining questions and thanking witnesses.
Action Requested
The Committee will hear from Tris Dyson, managing director at Nesta Challenges, and Professor Dame Ottoline Leyser, chief executive officer of UK Research and Innovation, to discuss the role and objectives of the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA).
Key Facts
- The deadline for amendments for the first two line-by-line sittings is the rise of the House tomorrow.
- Witnesses include Tris Dyson from Nesta Challenges and Professor Dame Ottoline Leyser from UK Research and Innovation.
- The Committee will sit in private until the witnesses are admitted.
- UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) invests £8 billion annually in research and innovation.
- ARIA is envisioned to work with a small cadre of visionary leaders who will drive forward transformative ideas.
- Nesta Challenges produced a report called “The Great Innovation Challenge” which explores new avenues for funding innovation.
- The success of ARIA depends on finding the right people who can operate at the edge of innovation.
- UKRI handles approximately 30 freedom of information requests per month.
- Professor Leyser and Tris Dyson advocate for a small, dynamic team with empowered programme managers.
- ARIA aims to fund innovative projects and reach talent outside established research organisations.
- Examples include DARPA's driverless car challenge prizes and the Ansari X prize for space flight.
- ARIA is expected to explore models like Kaggle coding competitions which can engage a wider range of people.
- Esther McVey chairs a Public Bill Committee meeting on the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill.
- The meeting involves discussing the £22 billion public sector investment in R&D.
- Daniel Zeichner asks about the uncertainty surrounding UKRI budgets and the cost of being part of the Horizon programme.
- Professor Leyser highlights the need for connectivity across the R&D system.
- The 'valley of death' refers to gaps in funding and support during the critical transition phase from research to marketable product.
- UKRI aims to build career pathways that facilitate movement between academia and industry.
- Witnesses include Professor Marianna Mazzucato from University College London.
- Professor Philip Bond is a professor of creativity and innovation at the University of Manchester.
- Professor James Wilsdon is the director of the Research on Research Institute based at the Wellcome Trust.
- Professor Mazzucato emphasizes that a successful ARIA requires a strong underlying system, collaboration across government departments, and clear missions or goals.
- Professor Wilsdon agrees on the need for clarity on purpose before setting up the agency and expresses concern over delayed effectiveness if this is not addressed.
- Both professors highlight risks of mission capture by particular interests without prior resolution of ARIA's function.
- ARPA started with a mission statement of 'Develop strategic advantage'.
- ARPAs have about 80% staff from industry and 20% from academia.
- DARPA aims for significant multiplicative effects rather than high risk-taking.
- DARPA is challenge-oriented but requires specific missions to achieve its goals.
- ARPA-E, with a budget of $300 million annually, focuses on high-risk innovation and economic impact.
- The UK's 2017 industrial strategy identified four challenges: healthy ageing, clean growth, future mobility, and AI/data economy opportunities.
- Professor Bond suggests a board of less than 10 people with non-executive directors.
- The programme managers at US ARPA are challenged in a 'dragons’ den' style setting to convince capable technical experts.
- Autonomy for the ARIA chair and director is crucial, allowing them to trust brilliant individuals with high integrity.
- The National Academy of Sciences has published a set of probing amendments to the Bill.
- The legislation should include a clause requiring ARIA to complement UKRI’s work.
- There is concern about defining ARIA's mission and function over a cyclical basis, such as a five-year cycle.
- Professor Mazzucato agrees with points made about investment.
- The UK has a below-average GERD (gross R&D spending) over GDP.
- The DARPA model is highlighted for its success in being ambitious and cheaply crowding in business investment.
- Esther McVey (Tatton) manages the timing of the session.
- The next speaker is Daniel Zeichner.
- Remaining time is less than 15 minutes.
- Professor Mazzucato speaks about the potential confusion caused by not naming an industrial strategy as such.
- She mentions that the US Government hired Nobel prize-winning physicist Steve Chu to direct ARPA-E with a $800 billion stimulus programme.
- Professor Bond discusses the focus on publishing papers in academia and suggests ARIA could do something different, focusing more on practical applications.
- Esther McVey is chairing the Public Bill Committee sitting.
- The discussion centres around the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill.
- Witnesses include Professor James Wilsdon, Professor Mariana Mazzucato, and Professor Philip Bond from respected universities.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy